Michael Pascoe writes:

When a member of your employer’s board is
done over in the courts and then makes a total ass of himself by going into
denial, you’d think a newspaper would be careful to ensure they record it,
however blandly.

Not the Sydney Morning Herald. The year is
only one month old, but totally missing/avoiding/overlooking the Federal Court
dumping on Roger Corbett’s Woolworths has to be a favourite for the “Miss of
2006” title.

The basic AAP copy was on the SMH website yesterday and remains there, but there’s
not a single sentence about it in today’s paper. In contrast, The Age carried a small item on page three and this longer piece online.

For a number of reasons, it’s an important
story. Just the $8.9 million fine isn’t bad and it’s anyone’s guess how many
millions more Corbett has blown on legal fees in the decade-long fight that went
all the way to the High Court. But Corbett’s reaction to the loss moves it onto
another plane as news again.

The miss can’t be a Fairfax conspiracy of
silence to avoid embarrassing one of their controversial board members as the
AFR runs it on page three and Chanticleer gives Corbett an appropriate
touch-up. It is nonetheless a very, very strange omission.

Peter Fray

Get your first 12 weeks of Crikey for $12.

Without subscribers, Crikey can’t do what it does. Fortunately, our support base is growing.

Every day, Crikey aims to bring new and challenging insights into politics, business, national affairs, media and society. We lift up the rocks that other news media largely ignore. Without your support, more of those rocks – and the secrets beneath them — will remain lodged in the dirt.

Join today and get your first 12 weeks of Crikey for just $12.

 

Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey

JOIN NOW