While the draft terror lawsare condemned as illiberal, let’s recognise the importance of Section 105.32,
Contacting family members etc.

It reads: “In this section: family member of a person means: (a) the person’s spouse, de facto spouse or
same-sex partner.”

So… the same-sex partner of a terror
suspect is recognised by the Government – but not the same-sex partner of a
member of the AFP, an ASIO officer or a soldier serving in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Great one!

The Gay and Lesbian Rights Lobby has jumped onto
this one. It’s issued a media release saying the inclusion of same-sex partners
within the definition of family in the Anti-Terrorism Bill 2005 highlights the
hypocrisy of the Howard Government’s decision not to recognise same-sex
relationships across all areas of federal legislation.

It points out that the move “follows the
inclusion of same-sex partner under the definition of ‘close family member’ in
the Anti-Terrorism Act (No. 2) 2004.”

At the same time, the GLRL says, the
Government continues to refuse to recognise same-sex couples across a broad
range of areas including superannuation, taxation, immigration, Medicare and
health insurance and – irony, irony – defence and veterans’ entitlements.

Get Crikey for $1 a week.

Lockdowns are over and BBQs are back! At last, we get to talk to people in real life. But conversation topics outside COVID are so thin on the ground.

Join Crikey and we’ll give you something to talk about. Get your first 12 weeks for $12 to get stories, analysis and BBQ stoppers you won’t see anywhere else.

Peter Fray
Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey
12 weeks for just $12.