<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; Washington Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/washington-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SMH turns Japanese &#8230; WaPo&#8217;s Scalia stuff-up &#8230; Daily Mail invented account &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/04/media-briefs-smh-turns-japanese-wapos-scalia-stuff-up-daily-mail-invented-account/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/04/media-briefs-smh-turns-japanese-wapos-scalia-stuff-up-daily-mail-invented-account/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 01:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Wilkie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Xenophon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sydney Morning Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=250675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In today's Media Briefs: <em>SMH</em> sports go Japanese ... NewsBeast retracts false quote ... Wilkie and Xenophon tackle Nine on pokie remarks and more ... ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/04/media-briefs-smh-turns-japanese-wapos-scalia-stuff-up-daily-mail-invented-account/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jones v Media Watch &#8230; emails deleted in NotW scandal &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/02/media-briefs-jones-v-media-watch-emails-deleted-in-notw-scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/02/media-briefs-jones-v-media-watch-emails-deleted-in-notw-scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 03:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2GB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alan jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news of the world phone hacking scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=238852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who watches Media Watch? More Sydney viewers than listen to Alan Jones. Plus, the front page of the day and other media news.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/02/media-briefs-jones-v-media-watch-emails-deleted-in-notw-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vale to the dean of the Washington press corps</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/09/AR2011030902821.html?hpid=topnews</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/09/AR2011030902821.html?hpid=topnews#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Broder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=209859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Pulitzer prize winning political columnist for the <em>Washington Post</em> died yesterday. David Broder was one of the most respected US political journalists in the US, winning his Pulitzer for his reporting on Nixon's Watergate scandal.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/09/AR2011030902821.html?hpid=topnews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grammar nazis, get reading and clicking at WashPo</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/idealab/2011/02/see-an-error-at-the-washington-post-now-you-can-easily-report-it039.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.pbs.org/idealab/2011/02/see-an-error-at-the-washington-post-now-you-can-easily-report-it039.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 23:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sub-editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=202464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of next week, every time a reader spots a factual error, typo or grammar mistake on a <em>WashingtonPost</em> article, they can immediately click on a feedback form to fill out and report it straight back to the paper. One way of dealing with dropping sub-editors numbers? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pbs.org/idealab/2011/02/see-an-error-at-the-washington-post-now-you-can-easily-report-it039.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hurtz hurts the future of old media</title>
		<link>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/05/howard-kurtz-daily-beast_n_751179.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/05/howard-kurtz-daily-beast_n_751179.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 23:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howard kurtz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Beast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=176532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Washington Post</em> stalwart Howard Kurtz is going digital: he's ditched <em>WaPo</em> to work for the <em>Daily Beast</em> website. Need more proof that newspapers are dying?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/05/howard-kurtz-daily-beast_n_751179.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oz TV makers sue Apple &#8230; if the Courier readers were PM</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/20/media-briefs-oz-tv-makers-sue-apple-if-the-courier-readers-were-pm-skys-shaky-election-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/20/media-briefs-oz-tv-makers-sue-apple-if-the-courier-readers-were-pm-skys-shaky-election-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 03:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courier-Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sky News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=154690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<i>The Courier Mail</i> roll out their new election campaign gimmick. Also, Sky's cameraman is either a Julia Gillard supporter or drunk, and are young journos burning out?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/20/media-briefs-oz-tv-makers-sue-apple-if-the-courier-readers-were-pm-skys-shaky-election-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vale Old Media</title>
		<link>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jarvis-coffin/the-washington-post-compa_b_648070.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jarvis-coffin/the-washington-post-compa_b_648070.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iCurrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=153842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>The Washington Post</em> has recently acquired online information business <em>iCurrent</em>. Is it time to say goodbye to old media? In a word: yes, writes <b>Jarvis Coffin</b>. 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jarvis-coffin/the-washington-post-compa_b_648070.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who can save Newsweek?</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/31/business/media/31carr.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/31/business/media/31carr.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 00:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=143070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Newsweek</em> is for sale. And it doesn't matter that its an internationally renowned publication, the fact that it is a weekly loss-making publication means it's worth basically nothing. <em>NY Times</em> assesses the possible buyers.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/31/business/media/31carr.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The price of paywalls: blocking out the bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/media/will-the-new-york-times-pay-wall-plan-be-a-turnoff-to-bloggers/19488977/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/media/will-the-new-york-times-pay-wall-plan-be-a-turnoff-to-bloggers/19488977/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 03:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=141108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most popular outlets for bloggers to link to are traditional news sites like <em>NY Times</em> and the BBC. So how will the proposed <em>NY Times</em> paywall affect its blogger audience?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/media/will-the-new-york-times-pay-wall-plan-be-a-turnoff-to-bloggers/19488977/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For Sale: Newsweek</title>
		<link>http://www.newsweek.com/id/237401</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsweek.com/id/237401#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 01:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=136123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Newsweek</em> magazine is on the market. Sure, it's had "losses in the tens of millions for the last two years", but 1.5 million subscribers should count for something. Any bidders?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsweek.com/id/237401/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Post confuses X and O &#8230; Bec backs away from No Idea</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/29/media-briefs-the-post-confuses-x-and-o-browns-gaffe-a-rupert-plot-bec-backs-away-from-no-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/29/media-briefs-the-post-confuses-x-and-o-browns-gaffe-a-rupert-plot-bec-backs-away-from-no-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=134181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did <i>The Washington Post</i> confuse Barack Obama with Malcolm X because they're both black? Plus: Rupert Murdoch fixing the British election and Google's reign continues in today's media briefs.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/29/media-briefs-the-post-confuses-x-and-o-browns-gaffe-a-rupert-plot-bec-backs-away-from-no-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pulitzer Prize winners announced</title>
		<link>http://www.pulitzer.org/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pulitzer.org/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigative journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ProPublica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pulitzer prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=129975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The winners of journalism's most coveted gongs have been announced: The <em>Washington Post</em> won the most awards, while investigative outfit <em>ProPublica</em> clocked up one for online journalism with a nod for its <a href="http://www.propublica.org/series/deadly-choices">excellent expose</a> on New Orleans hospitals post-Katrina.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pulitzer.org/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Post launches an unashamedly right-wing blog</title>
		<link>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/04/welcome_to_right_now.html</link>
		<comments>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/04/welcome_to_right_now.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 01:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative commentators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=129051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <em>Washington Post</em> has a new blog all about the "conservative movement" and Republican Party, promising to explain what the right is "doing, thinking, and planning". Could be fascinating reading for political junkies of all persuasions. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/04/welcome_to_right_now.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The front cover photo that infuriated Washington Post readers</title>
		<link>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ombudsman-blog/2010/03/readers_react_to_photo_of_two.html</link>
		<comments>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ombudsman-blog/2010/03/readers_react_to_photo_of_two.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex & Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=122160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which controversial photo on the front cover of the <em>Washington Post</em> would anger readers and cause 27 cancelled subscriptions? Apparently two men kissing was enough to freak out the US capital.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ombudsman-blog/2010/03/readers_react_to_photo_of_two.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Post-ing a profit thanks to cost cutting</title>
		<link>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/24/washington-post-profit-qu_n_474674.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/24/washington-post-profit-qu_n_474674.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=119147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who says newspapers are dying? <em>Washington Post's</em> profits have quadrupled in the last quarter. Except, profits are due to cutting costs and staff, rather than an increase in newspaper sales.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/24/washington-post-profit-qu_n_474674.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The death of the Washington Post</title>
		<link>http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/post-apocalypse?page=0,0</link>
		<comments>http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/post-apocalypse?page=0,0#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=110765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The once great <em>Washington Post</em> is crumbling: plagued by ethics scandals, dwindling finances and lacking any strong identity, the paper is scrambling for a way forward. <em>The New Republic</em> chronicles its demise.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/post-apocalypse?page=0,0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Post: Why we&#8217;re making more typos</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/15/AR2010011502419.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/15/AR2010011502419.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lazy journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=110545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Washington Post</em> ombudsman <b>Andrew Alexander</b> explains why the paper's grammar and syntax has been getting a little sloppy of late: fewer staff and the "real-time news" demands of the internet.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/15/AR2010011502419.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Washington Post&#8216;s Next Great Pundit</title>
		<link>http://views.washingtonpost.com/pundit-judges/2009/11/angp_winner_kevin_huffman.html</link>
		<comments>http://views.washingtonpost.com/pundit-judges/2009/11/angp_winner_kevin_huffman.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America's Next Great Pundit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commentators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=100832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <em>Washington Post</em> has announced the winner of its reality-TV-style <a href="http://gawker.com/5370214/the-washington-post-launches-americas-next-top-pundit">Next Great Pundit</a> competition, and -- surprise! -- it's a liberal, white, male, middle-aged, well-educated lawyer. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://views.washingtonpost.com/pundit-judges/2009/11/angp_winner_kevin_huffman.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsroom fist fight at the Washington Post</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonian.com/blogarticles/people/capitalcomment/14004.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonian.com/blogarticles/people/capitalcomment/14004.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists behaving badly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=96742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pulitzer prize-winning <em>Washington Post</em> editor Henry Allen recently punched out one of the paper's feature writers after he was presented with "the second worst story I have seen in <em>Style</em> in 43 years."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonian.com/blogarticles/people/capitalcomment/14004.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politico and Wash Post to engage in DC territorial pissing</title>
		<link>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/28/politico-owner-launching_n_337394.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/28/politico-owner-launching_n_337394.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of the media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hyperlocal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=96012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online political news site <a href="http://www.politico.com">Politico</a> is going to launch a local Washington DC edition of the site, headed up by the former editor of <em>WashingtonPost.com</em>. It's a pretty direct attack on <a href="http://www.tnr.com/blog/the-plank/the-owner-%E2%80%98politico%E2%80%99-going-after-the-%E2%80%98post%E2%80%99-again">The Washington Post</a>'s DC supremacy, and <em>HuffPo</em> has its hands on an internal memo that outlines the plans.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/28/politico-owner-launching_n_337394.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great moments in journalism: America&#8217;s Next Top Pundit</title>
		<link>http://gawker.com/5370214/the-washington-post-launches-americas-next-top-pundit</link>
		<comments>http://gawker.com/5370214/the-washington-post-launches-americas-next-top-pundit#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America's Next Great Pundit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=90046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>The Washington Post</em> is <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/opinions/pundit-contest/index.html">running a contest</a> to find "America's Next Great Pundit". Contestants will face-off in a series of challenges, judged by <em>Post</em> staff, and readers will vote on who wins a coveted byline with the paper. No matter who wins, journalism is the loser. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/5370214/the-washington-post-launches-americas-next-top-pundit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Twitter actually help journalism?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2009/09/28/the-washington-post-and-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2009/09/28/the-washington-post-and-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists on Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=89290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>The Washington Post</em>'s new guidelines for staff use of Twitter try to keep the paper's voice objective and fact-based. But what if new media were actually the path to greater objectivity? wonders <b>Margaret Simons</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2009/09/28/the-washington-post-and-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The White House springs a leak</title>
		<link>http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27414.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27414.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=88605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>The Washington Post</em> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/20/AR2009092002920.html">recently got its hands</a> on a leaked report from the US commander in Afghanistan to President Obama. So who let it slip? And why?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27414.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family feud: why the Post may outlive the Times</title>
		<link>http://www.vanityfair.com/business/features/2009/10/wolff200910</link>
		<comments>http://www.vanityfair.com/business/features/2009/10/wolff200910#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 11:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=84471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both of America's premier mastheads, the <em>New York Times</em> and <em>Washington Post</em> are suffering in the media downturn. But the <em>Post</em> has one advantage that may see it weather the storm better, says <b>Michael Wolff</b>: likeable owners.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vanityfair.com/business/features/2009/10/wolff200910/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Murdoch led consortium</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/24/richard-farmers-political-bite-sized-meaty-chunks-79/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/24/richard-farmers-political-bite-sized-meaty-chunks-79/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Farmer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnaby Joyce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearst Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political spin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tribune Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/24/richard-farmers-political-bite-sized-meaty-chunks-79/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Murdoch led consortium plus a beautiful bit of spinning by the Rudd PR team. Also, would you give the Nationals a chance with Barnaby Joyce as leader?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/24/richard-farmers-political-bite-sized-meaty-chunks-79/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1611/1884 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 03:22:50 -->
