<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; Wall Street Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/wall-street-journal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:31:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Paywalls: the tricky trouble with the internets</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/10/crikey-says-126/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/10/crikey-says-126/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/10/crikey-says-126/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch has had a lot to say lately about the internet, and how a modern media mogul might milk it for corporate gain. Luckily, we can milk it right back.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/10/crikey-says-126/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSJ weighs in with &quot;Aussie Mac&quot; in the making</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/16/wsj-weighs-in-with-aussie-mac-in-the-making/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/16/wsj-weighs-in-with-aussie-mac-in-the-making/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fannie mae and freddie mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rmbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/16/wsj-weighs-in-with-aussie-mac-in-the-making/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <i>Wall Street Journal</i> has thrown its weight behind an Aussie Mac in the making, writes <b>Joshua Gans</b>. Should Australia review its financial regulations in light of future GFCs?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/16/wsj-weighs-in-with-aussie-mac-in-the-making/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rupert hedges his bets: locks up WSJ while chasing Hulu</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/12/rupert-hedges-his-bets-locks-up-wsj-while-chasing-hulu/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/12/rupert-hedges-his-bets-locks-up-wsj-while-chasing-hulu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 03:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Dyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=57373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again we have an example of Rupert Murdoch saying something and doing something completely different on the same subject: the internet.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/12/rupert-hedges-his-bets-locks-up-wsj-while-chasing-hulu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Albrechtsen tells the left to lighten up</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/27/albrechtsen-tells-the-left-to-lighten-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/27/albrechtsen-tells-the-left-to-lighten-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 04:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy Rundle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Albrechtsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Simpsons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=53402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guy Rundle responds to Janet Albrechtsen's comments about lefties; WSJ maps newspapers' deaths and Ten stops doing the Bartman. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/27/albrechtsen-tells-the-left-to-lighten-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What would Sir Keith think about losing $4.4 billion on one deal?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/02/09/what-would-sir-keith-think-about-losing-44-billion-on-one-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/02/09/what-would-sir-keith-think-about-losing-44-billion-on-one-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elisabeth Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herald Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What was once easily the biggest Australian company is now in danger of falling out of the top 10, writes <b>Stephen Mayne</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/02/09/what-would-sir-keith-think-about-losing-44-billion-on-one-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beecher: The unravelling economics of newspapers</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/17/beecher-the-unravelling-economics-of-newspapers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/17/beecher-the-unravelling-economics-of-newspapers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under enormous pressure to prop up their bottom lines, newspapers in most developed countries are resorting to a cocktail of short-term measures, writes <b>Eric Beecher</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/17/beecher-the-unravelling-economics-of-newspapers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stuff we like</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/28/stuff-we-like/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/28/stuff-we-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuff we like]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sebastian Faulks channels Ian Fleming in Devil May Care, Tracey Spicer reviews Boned, and the WSJ discovers the fairer sex.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/28/stuff-we-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Be warned, Murdoch is an old man in a hurry</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/23/be-warned-murdoch-is-an-old-man-in-a-hurry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/23/be-warned-murdoch-is-an-old-man-in-a-hurry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday Rupert Murdoch had a big day. He sacked the editor of the Wall Street Journal and he almost finalised a deal to buy Newsday. All in a day's work for the world's hungriest media owner, writes Crikey publisher <b>Eric Beecher</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/23/be-warned-murdoch-is-an-old-man-in-a-hurry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Wall Street Journal: We distort. You decide</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/15/my-wall-street-journal-we-distort-you-decide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/15/my-wall-street-journal-we-distort-you-decide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A parody of The Wall Street Journal on US newsstands this week to mark the April 15 tax deadline dubbed 'My Wall Street Journal' has pissed off News Corp executives so much that Wall Street Journal reps are running around town buying up copies to prevent people from seeing them.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/15/my-wall-street-journal-we-distort-you-decide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Centro trading halt has investors fearing the worst</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/01/11/centro-trading-halt-has-investors-fearing-the-worst/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/01/11/centro-trading-halt-has-investors-fearing-the-worst/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global credit crunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skittish investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne Swan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Centro's trading halt is just part of the extraordinary global credit crunch which saw some more remarkable developments over night, writes Stephen Mayne.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/01/11/centro-trading-halt-has-investors-fearing-the-worst/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox Business Channel gets ready for lift-off</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/14/fox-business-channel-gets-ready-for-lift-off/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/14/fox-business-channel-gets-ready-for-lift-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gossip column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Durie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruth ostrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sky News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s all hands to the panic stations at Sky News and at The Australian as the launch date for the Australian version of the Fox Business Channel approaches, writes Glenn Dyer.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/14/fox-business-channel-gets-ready-for-lift-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rupert drops to 10%, imposes kids on shareholders</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/10/rupert-drops-to-10-imposes-kids-on-shareholders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/10/rupert-drops-to-10-imposes-kids-on-shareholders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lachlan Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neil chenoweth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sir keith murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a truckload of commentary in the non-Murdoch press about James Murdoch’s ascension to the third most senior position at News Corporation, but one little explored angle is the role of Lachlan Murdoch and Australia, writes Stephen Mayne.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/10/rupert-drops-to-10-imposes-kids-on-shareholders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game on – the campaign to end Rupert’s News Corp gerrymander</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/07/game-on-the-campaign-to-end-ruperts-news-corp-gerrymander/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/07/game-on-the-campaign-to-end-ruperts-news-corp-gerrymander/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Lowy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Mayne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s game on for one of the biggest shareholder activism campaigns Australia has seen and News Corp’s Rupert Murdoch is in the frame.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/07/game-on-the-campaign-to-end-ruperts-news-corp-gerrymander/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive: SEC forces Rupert to run shareholder vote on gerrymander</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/06/exclusive-sec-forces-rupert-to-run-shareholder-vote-on-gerrymander/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/06/exclusive-sec-forces-rupert-to-run-shareholder-vote-on-gerrymander/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gerrymander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sir joh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The dubious system which sees almost 70% of News Corp shares stripped of voting rights will be put to the test at this year’s October AGM in New York after the US Securities and Exchange Commission rejected Rupert’s objections to my shareholder resolution, writes Stephen Mayne.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/06/exclusive-sec-forces-rupert-to-run-shareholder-vote-on-gerrymander/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rupert talks WSJ, MySpace, and $$$</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/09/rupert-talks-wsj-myspace-and/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/09/rupert-talks-wsj-myspace-and/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dow jones company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday saw News Corp report to the people about how the company is travelling. Here are some of Rupert's thoughts. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/09/rupert-talks-wsj-myspace-and/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Clinton takes on the WSJ: crazier than Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/07/bill-clinton-takes-on-the-wsj-crazier-than-fox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/07/bill-clinton-takes-on-the-wsj-crazier-than-fox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob dole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honest reporters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support bill clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a weekend conversation with wealthy supporters that was closed to reporters, Bill Clinton was asked about Rupert Murdoch's takeover of <i>The Wall Street Journal</i>, writes Huffington Post blogger Blake Fleetwood. 

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/07/bill-clinton-takes-on-the-wsj-crazier-than-fox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murdoch and the WSJ, some further reading</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/03/murdoch-and-the-wsj-some-further-reading/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/03/murdoch-and-the-wsj-some-further-reading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising revenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So it's not unreasonable to assume that Murdoch was forced to pay somewhere between $760 million and $1.22 billion more for Dow Jones just because of his reputation.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/03/murdoch-and-the-wsj-some-further-reading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crikey says, 3 August 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/03/crikey-says-3-august-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/03/crikey-says-3-august-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Your Say: Daily Mail readers' feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amp company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nicholas negroponte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can Rupert Murdoch change his spots as proprietor of the Wall Street Journal? What do you think ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/03/crikey-says-3-august-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murdoch&#8217;s WSJ buyout: snubbing the snobs</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/02/murdochs-wsj-buyout-snubbing-the-snobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/02/murdochs-wsj-buyout-snubbing-the-snobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ironically]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[my pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wsj]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why shouldn’t Rupert Murdoch own the Wall Street Journal? Why should we be worried by the idea?

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/02/murdochs-wsj-buyout-snubbing-the-snobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murdoch: putting a Fox up Wall Street</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/02/murdoch-putting-a-fox-up-wall-street/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/02/murdoch-putting-a-fox-up-wall-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial times of london]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moveon org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wsj]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you think of News Corp.'s deal to buy Dow Jones? That was the question posed on the <i>Wall Street Journal’s</i> blog yesterday. More than 600 replies later the verdict of the internet readers was clear.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/02/murdoch-putting-a-fox-up-wall-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buying The Wall Street Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/01/buying-the-wall-street-journal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/01/buying-the-wall-street-journal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dow jones newswire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dow jones newswires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox television network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Murdoch's latest aquisition made headlines across the world. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/01/buying-the-wall-street-journal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bancrofts &#8220;dragged kicking and screaming&#8221; to Murdoch’s victory</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/01/bancrofts-dragged-kicking-and-screaming-to-murdochs-victory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/01/bancrofts-dragged-kicking-and-screaming-to-murdochs-victory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kicking and screaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketwatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What <I>Wall Street Journal</i> journos are saying. And is it wise?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/01/bancrofts-dragged-kicking-and-screaming-to-murdochs-victory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lying for Rupert: all in a day&#8217;s work</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/30/lying-for-rupert-all-in-a-days-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/30/lying-for-rupert-all-in-a-days-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mr philip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sackville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One trusts  <i>The Wall Street Journal’s</i> Bancroft family has been reassured about News Corp’s corporate character by official confirmation that lying for Rupert’s commercial interests is perfectly acceptable behaviour. Now where’s that promise about maintaining editorial integrity...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/30/lying-for-rupert-all-in-a-days-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Never mind the WSJ, what about The Simpsons?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/16/never-mind-the-wsj-what-about-the-simpsons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/16/never-mind-the-wsj-what-about-the-simpsons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creator matt groening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the 35 members of the Bancroft family have been concerned that selling their beloved <i>Wall Street Journal</i> to Rupert Murdoch will negate the newspaper's integrity, they need look no further than <i>The Simpsons</i> to put their minds at ease.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/16/never-mind-the-wsj-what-about-the-simpsons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will MacBank’s remuneration report be overwhelmingly endorsed again?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/05/will-macbanks-remuneration-report-be-overwhelmingly-endorsed-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/05/will-macbanks-remuneration-report-be-overwhelmingly-endorsed-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macquarie airports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macquarie Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macquarie communications infrastructure group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macquarie goodman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Macquarie Bank shares are up another $1.80 to $88.80 today as the lines get drawn for what should be a fascinating showdown about executive pay at its annual meeting in Sydney on 19 July. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/05/will-macbanks-remuneration-report-be-overwhelmingly-endorsed-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
