<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; Wall Street Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/wall-street-journal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Another wheel falls off Murdoch train wreck</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/13/crikey-says-another-wheel-falls-off-murdoch-train-wreck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/13/crikey-says-another-wheel-falls-off-murdoch-train-wreck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 02:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wsj]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=252457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should it surprise anyone that the corporate culture that produced industrial-scale phone hacking in Britain was also at work elsewhere? Hardly.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/13/crikey-says-another-wheel-falls-off-murdoch-train-wreck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News Corp&#8217;s bizarre idea of a whistleblower site</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/06/news-corps-bizarre-idea-of-a-whistleblower-site/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/06/news-corps-bizarre-idea-of-a-whistleblower-site/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 03:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whistleblowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=221564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News Corp's effort to copy Wikileaks is an IT debacle - but worse is to come when you read the fine print.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/06/news-corps-bizarre-idea-of-a-whistleblower-site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware of the WSJ&#8217;s shoddy WikiLeaks knockoff</title>
		<link>http://gawker.com/#!5799112</link>
		<comments>http://gawker.com/#!5799112#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=221521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> this week launched <em>Safehouse</em>, its very own version of <em>WikiLeaks</em>. But beware: there is a dodgy caveat in its terms of use and numerous security flaws, writes <b>Adrian Chen</b>. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/#!5799112/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Losing your money with Rupert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2011/03/05/losing-your-money-with-rupert-us25-billion-since-he-bought-the-wall-street-journal/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2011/03/05/losing-your-money-with-rupert-us25-billion-since-he-bought-the-wall-street-journal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 22:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Limited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=208175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no wonder that the News Limited papers are so quick to spot wasteful spending by governments, the company is a specialist on the subject, with shareholders down $US25 billion since the purchase of the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, reports <b>Richard Farmer</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2011/03/05/losing-your-money-with-rupert-us25-billion-since-he-bought-the-wall-street-journal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The US embassy cables: to publish or not to publish?</title>
		<link>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703785704575643431883607708.html</link>
		<comments>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703785704575643431883607708.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks embassy cables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=189581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the latest WikiLeaks US embassy cables dump, a variety of news organisations -- think <em>Le Monde</em>, the <em>NY Times</em>, <em>The Guardian</em> etc -- all got first dibs on the documents. The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> declined the offer. Here's why.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703785704575643431883607708.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hong Kong, where democracy has stalled</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/29/letter-from-hong-kong-where-democracy-has-stalled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/29/letter-from-hong-kong-where-democracy-has-stalled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letter from...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hong kong economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=175070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As well as being a base for international finance and banking giants who want proximity to mainland China, Hong Kong has its own business interests to facilitate, writes freelance journalist <b>Simon Roughneen</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/29/letter-from-hong-kong-where-democracy-has-stalled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;ll cost Obama $600,00 to read the WSJ</title>
		<link>http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0710/40337.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0710/40337.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=159084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For over a decade in Washington, government staff have read a daily organised wrap of press clippings from major publications. Except, Murdoch's <em>Wall Street Journal</em> has decided to up the price for <em>WSJ</em> clippings by a whopping $600,000.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0710/40337.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The price of paywalls: blocking out the bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/media/will-the-new-york-times-pay-wall-plan-be-a-turnoff-to-bloggers/19488977/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/media/will-the-new-york-times-pay-wall-plan-be-a-turnoff-to-bloggers/19488977/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 03:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=141108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most popular outlets for bloggers to link to are traditional news sites like <em>NY Times</em> and the BBC. So how will the proposed <em>NY Times</em> paywall affect its blogger audience?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/media/will-the-new-york-times-pay-wall-plan-be-a-turnoff-to-bloggers/19488977/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why we can no longer trust the WSJ</title>
		<link>http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/wsj_kagan_softball_trust.php?page=all</link>
		<comments>http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/wsj_kagan_softball_trust.php?page=all#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 04:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=138318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, the <em>Wall St Journal</em> ran a front-page photo of Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan playing softball. It was clearly implying she is a lesbian, says <b>Ryan Chittum</b>: this never would have happened at the pre-Murdoch <em>Journal</em>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/wsj_kagan_softball_trust.php?page=all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSJ vs. NYT: the smacktalk showdown</title>
		<link>http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2010/04/scoring_the_wal.php</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2010/04/scoring_the_wal.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 01:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ vs. NYT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=133831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The war of words between the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> and <em>New York Times</em> over the <em>Journal</em>'s new New York section has gotten dirty. <em>Village Voice</em> scores the verbal slugfest.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2010/04/scoring_the_wal.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shafer: Murdoch wants New York&#8217;s love, not its money</title>
		<link>http://www.slate.com/id/2252046/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slate.com/id/2252046/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 03:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greater New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=133533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look at moi, look at moi: the <em>WSJ</em>'s new New York section is more about winning over the people of New York than it is about ad dollars or sales revenue, says <b>Jack Shafer</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/id/2252046/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYT vs. WSJ: the last great newspaper war?</title>
		<link>http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/04/print-war-between-nyt-and-wsj-is-really-about-digital/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/04/print-war-between-nyt-and-wsj-is-really-about-digital/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=133362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> is muscling in on the <em>New York Times</em>' territory, launching a local New York section. Is this really the last great newspaper war, or just the first great battle of the online news age? asks <em>Wired</em>.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/04/print-war-between-nyt-and-wsj-is-really-about-digital/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The history of the WSJ hedcut</title>
		<link>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704207504575129961786135180.html?mod=e2tw</link>
		<comments>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704207504575129961786135180.html?mod=e2tw#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art & Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drawing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=125104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> takes you through the history and evolution of its iconic <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedcut">hedcut</a> drawings. Each is still hand-drawn by an army of artists and can take up to five hours to complete.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704207504575129961786135180.html?mod=e2tw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mad Murdoch and his media legacy</title>
		<link>http://nymag.com/news/media/64305/</link>
		<comments>http://nymag.com/news/media/64305/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jounal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[must read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Limited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=120075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An in depth profile by <em>NY Mag</em> on the aging Rupert Murdoch's holy media missions, including his hatred of lazy liberal journalists, his obsession with the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> and his plan to bleed the <em>NY Times</em> dry.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nymag.com/news/media/64305/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The WSJ accuses the NYT of plagiarism</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/feb/16/new-york-times-plagiarism</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/feb/16/new-york-times-plagiarism#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=117284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <em>Guardian</em> has a copy of a letter sent from the <em>Wall St Journal</em> to the <en>New York Times, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/feb/15/new-york-times-newspapers">accusing</a> the paper of plagiarising a story about Bernie Madoff.</en>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/feb/16/new-york-times-plagiarism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips and rumours: No Christmas spirit in the public service</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/11/tips-and-rumours-158/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/11/tips-and-rumours-158/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips and rumours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Channel Ten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment and workplace relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soccer™]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vegemite iSnack 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=108782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which was the tight-arsed government department that docked everyone's pay (or forced them to make up the time!) because of some employees leaving five minutes early on Christmas Eve?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/11/tips-and-rumours-158/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSJ vs. NYT</title>
		<link>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/robert-thomson-takes-swing-david-carr-bill-keller</link>
		<comments>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/robert-thomson-takes-swing-david-carr-bill-keller#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=105789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <em>Wall Street Journal</em> is a little pissed about <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/14/business/media/14carr.html?_r=2&#038;hp">a recent</a> <em>New York Times</em> piece claiming the <em>Journal</em> has shifted rightward under Rupert Murdoch's ownership. It's snarky press releases at 20 paces. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/robert-thomson-takes-swing-david-carr-bill-keller/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Rupert ruined the WSJ</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/14/business/media/14carr.html?_r=2&#038;hp</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/14/business/media/14carr.html?_r=2&#038;hp#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=105719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the second anniversary of Rupert Murdoch's purchase of the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, current and former writers say his conservative politics have tainted the paper's editorial objectivity and quality.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/14/business/media/14carr.html?_r=2&#038;hp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murdoch lieutenant: &#8220;Free costs too much&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/organgrinder/2009/dec/01/false-gospel-web-murdoch-lieutenant</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/organgrinder/2009/dec/01/false-gospel-web-murdoch-lieutenant#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Les Hinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=102591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CEO of News Corp publisher Dow Jones, Les Hinton, has -- surprise, surprise -- come out in defence of the company's move to paywall all its content, denouncing the "false gospel of the web": "We were promised that eyeballs meant advertising, clicks meant cash".]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/organgrinder/2009/dec/01/false-gospel-web-murdoch-lieutenant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which print pubs have the richest readers?</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-wealthy-print-readers-2009-11?utm_source=Triggermail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=SAI%20Chart%20Of%20The%20Day%2C%20Thursday%2011%2F19%2F09</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-wealthy-print-readers-2009-11?utm_source=Triggermail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=SAI%20Chart%20Of%20The%20Day%2C%20Thursday%2011%2F19%2F09#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Architectural Digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graph pr0n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=99903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Silicon Valley Insider</em> charts newspapers and magazines with the wealthiest readerships. <em>Wall Street Journal</em> readers are the most cashed-up, while <em>The Atlantic</em>, <em>The Economist</em> and <em>Architectural Digest</em> readers also break the 100k mark.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-wealthy-print-readers-2009-11?utm_source=Triggermail&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_campaign=SAI%20Chart%20Of%20The%20Day%2C%20Thursday%2011%2F19%2F09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paywalls: the tricky trouble with the internets</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/10/crikey-says-126/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/10/crikey-says-126/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/10/crikey-says-126/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch has had a lot to say lately about the internet, and how a modern media mogul might milk it for corporate gain. Luckily, we can milk it right back.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/10/crikey-says-126/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Murdoch wants to destroy the NY Times</title>
		<link>http://www.newser.com/off-the-grid/post/326/rupert-murdoch-is-mad-but-cute.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.newser.com/off-the-grid/post/326/rupert-murdoch-is-mad-but-cute.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=97618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News Corp's <em>Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/wall-street-journal-to-hire-about-a-dozen-reporters-to-cover-local-news-in-new-york/">is stepping-up</a> its New York coverage, and it's all part of Rupert Murdoch's single-minded plan to strike a massive blow against the liberal world by buying-out or destroying the <em>NYT</em>, says <b>Michael Wolff</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newser.com/off-the-grid/post/326/rupert-murdoch-is-mad-but-cute.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSJ weighs in with &quot;Aussie Mac&quot; in the making</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/16/wsj-weighs-in-with-aussie-mac-in-the-making/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/16/wsj-weighs-in-with-aussie-mac-in-the-making/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fannie mae and freddie mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rmbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/16/wsj-weighs-in-with-aussie-mac-in-the-making/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <i>Wall Street Journal</i> has thrown its weight behind an Aussie Mac in the making, writes <b>Joshua Gans</b>. Should Australia review its financial regulations in light of future GFCs?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/16/wsj-weighs-in-with-aussie-mac-in-the-making/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the WSJ hemorrhaging money?</title>
		<link>http://gawker.com/5381557/is-the-wall-street-journal-bleeding-cash</link>
		<comments>http://gawker.com/5381557/is-the-wall-street-journal-bleeding-cash#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=93088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tipsters tell <em>Gawker</em> that the News Corp-owned <em>Wall Street Journal</em> is on track to lose $100 million this year. Given the <em>Journal</em> is Murdoch's big paywall success story, the news could cause a lot of red faces if true.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/5381557/is-the-wall-street-journal-bleeding-cash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Far Eastern Economic Review to close</title>
		<link>http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Dow-Jones-to-shutter-Far-apf-3718640398.html?x=0&#038;.v=1</link>
		<comments>http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Dow-Jones-to-shutter-Far-apf-3718640398.html?x=0&#038;.v=1#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 02:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Far Eastern Economic Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=88465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Publisher Dow Jones is canning its excellent <em>Far Eastern Economic Review</em> journal after 63 years. Although now a skeleton of its former self, the publication will leave a large hole in the pan-Asian press industry, which can hopefully be filled by the <em><a href="http://www.wsj-asia.com/">WSJ Asia</a></em>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Dow-Jones-to-shutter-Far-apf-3718640398.html?x=0&#038;.v=1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1681/1930 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 05:30:40 -->
