<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; united nations security council</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/united-nations-security-council/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Iran hit with tougher sanctions</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticwire.com/opinions/view/opinion/Iran-Sanctions-Pass-But-Will-They-Work-3924</link>
		<comments>http://www.theatlanticwire.com/opinions/view/opinion/Iran-Sanctions-Pass-But-Will-They-Work-3924#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united nations security council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=145048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UN Security Council has voted to put new, tougher sanctions on Iran, in protest to its nuclear program, with even Russia and China voting in favour. But will the sanctions work?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theatlanticwire.com/opinions/view/opinion/Iran-Sanctions-Pass-But-Will-They-Work-3924/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netanyahu: &#8220;This was no love boat&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/03/world/middleeast/03flotilla.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/03/world/middleeast/03flotilla.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Netanyahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel flotilla attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Geraghty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul McGeough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united nations security council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=143314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Israel PM Benjamin Netanyahu has <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVUJEyNrpM4">come out in defence</a> [video]of the deadly flotilla attack, saying that Israel had to defend Gaza from weapons smuggling. The UN Security Council is now investigating.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/03/world/middleeast/03flotilla.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vietnam takes UN role as monastery is under siege</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/01/vietnam-takes-un-role-as-monastery-is-under-siege/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/01/vietnam-takes-un-role-as-monastery-is-under-siege/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nobel peace prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thich Nhat Hanh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united nations security council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vietnam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/01/vietnam-takes-un-role-as-monastery-is-under-siege/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The world should condemn the fact that  300 Buddhist monks and nuns were forcibly evicted from Prajna Monastery in Bat Nha, six hours drive from Ho Chi Minh City, writes <b>Hoa Pham</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/01/vietnam-takes-un-role-as-monastery-is-under-siege/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Iran sanction fears awakened the sleeping  giant</title>
		<link>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-lynch/china-iran-sanctions-what_b_303222.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-lynch/china-iran-sanctions-what_b_303222.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear weapons program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united nations security council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=89852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China has only recently come back into the UN's good books. So why doesn't it support sanctions against Iran in light of its secret nuclear facility? What <em>is</em> the nature of China and Iran's relationship? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-lynch/china-iran-sanctions-what_b_303222.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran vs. the world</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/world/middleeast/28nuke.html?hp</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/world/middleeast/28nuke.html?hp#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations General Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united nations security council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=89223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the weekend, Obama and the UN <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/sep/25/iran-secret-underground-nuclear-plant">called Iran out</a> over a secret nuclear facility. Ahmedinejad <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=113217386">came clean</a> and <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2009/09/26/iran_to_allow_un_inspectors_at_its_new_nuke_site/">invited</a> the <a href="http://www.iaea.org/">IAEA</a> over for a look. But the US <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/27/world/middleeast/27nuke.html?hp">wants to come too</a>. So Iran allayed everyone's fears by <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSLR4715320090927">firing off some missiles</a>. Will Obama respond with tougher sanctions?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/world/middleeast/28nuke.html?hp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Australia suddenly sucking up to Cape Verde?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.abc.net.au/offair/2009/09/uhlmann-verde.html</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.abc.net.au/offair/2009/09/uhlmann-verde.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cape Verde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united nations security council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=89046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What trade interests could Australia possibly have in the tiny African islands of Cape Verde? Bananas? Volcanic rock? Or maybe Australia has a more underhanded reason for making them <a href="http://www.foreignminister.gov.au/releases/2009/fa-s090922a.html">our new BFFs</a>, suggests <b>Chris Uhlmann</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.abc.net.au/offair/2009/09/uhlmann-verde.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why disarmament is a waste of time</title>
		<link>http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OWQ1OThkNDliMTAzZWRhYzExYjk5NGM1NjZlNjlkZDA=</link>
		<comments>http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OWQ1OThkNDliMTAzZWRhYzExYjk5NGM1NjZlNjlkZDA=#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear disarmament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united nations security council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=88886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama should not look to the "toothless" UN to address the threat of nuclear weapons, says <b>Brett Schaefer</b>. History tells us he's wasting his time.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OWQ1OThkNDliMTAzZWRhYzExYjk5NGM1NjZlNjlkZDA=/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rebuilding the world without nukes</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/sep/24/nuclear-weapons-un-security-council-obama</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/sep/24/nuclear-weapons-un-security-council-obama#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united nations security council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=88881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UN's resolution to rid the world of nuclear weapons is nothing short of remarkable, says <b>Joe Cirincione</b>. It has brought the world together to rebuild a global society with a strong and enduring foundation.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/sep/24/nuclear-weapons-un-security-council-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama drops a bomb</title>
		<link>http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-09-23/drop-the-bomb-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-09-23/drop-the-bomb-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united nations security council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=88871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama's leadership on ridding the world of nuclear weapons echoes John F. Kennedy's efforts from decades earlier. It's the kind of action necessary to prevent a second nuclear age.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-09-23/drop-the-bomb-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Towards a nuclear-free world</title>
		<link>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/09/25/2695977.htm?section=world</link>
		<comments>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/09/25/2695977.htm?section=world#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations General Assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united nations security council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=88867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UN Security Council has unanimously backed a resolution to rid the world of nuclear weapons. It's an historic move, but is it enough to head off a nuclear showdown with Iran?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/09/25/2695977.htm?section=world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zimbabwe in crisis: A Crikey wrap</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/12/12/zimbabwe-in-crisis-a-crikey-wrap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/12/12/zimbabwe-in-crisis-a-crikey-wrap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president robert mugabe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united nations security council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zimbabwe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe has clearly lost the plot, denying there is a cholera epidemic unfolding as his country teeters on the verge of collapse.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/12/12/zimbabwe-in-crisis-a-crikey-wrap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flint: Rudd should embrace the Anglosphere</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/01/07/flint-rudd-should-embrace-the-anglosphere/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/01/07/flint-rudd-should-embrace-the-anglosphere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexander Downer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily telegraph london]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Sheridan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial vacancies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united nations security council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is one international organisation with standards – the Commonwealth. But that is not one of Mr. Rudd’s foreign policy pillars – the US alliance, Asia, and the UN.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/01/07/flint-rudd-should-embrace-the-anglosphere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 974/1107 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 07:31:52 -->
