<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; tobacco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/tobacco/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hey IPA, asking you to out your donor list isn&#8217;t censorship</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/18/hey-ipa-asking-you-to-out-your-donor-list-isnt-censorship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/18/hey-ipa-asking-you-to-out-your-donor-list-isnt-censorship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 03:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy Rundle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Rundle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute of Public Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plain packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=235475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When called to justify their complex relation to donors, the IPA's foot soldiers start mewling about being "silenced" or "censored".]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/18/hey-ipa-asking-you-to-out-your-donor-list-isnt-censorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plain tobacco packs: &#8220;draconian&#8221; or a massive win for public health?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2010/04/29/plain-tobacco-packs-draconian-or-a-massive-win-for-public-health/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2010/04/29/plain-tobacco-packs-draconian-or-a-massive-win-for-public-health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Sweet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarette packets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Australian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/29/plain-tobacco-packs-draconian-or-a-massive-win-for-public-health/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>The Oz</em> has labelled Rudd’s plans for plain packaging of tobacco products as "draconian", but public health experts are wildly enthusiastic, reports <b>Melissa Sweet</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2010/04/29/plain-tobacco-packs-draconian-or-a-massive-win-for-public-health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama toughens cigarette laws, but is he still puffin&#8217;?</title>
		<link>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/22/press-corps-demands-to-kn_n_219259.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/22/press-corps-demands-to-kn_n_219259.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarette advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food and drug administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=68745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president has signed an anti-smoking bill that gives the FDA more authority to regulate cigarette sales and advertising. But the press corps had one question: are you still smoking?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/22/press-corps-demands-to-kn_n_219259.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tobacco candy: gross but green</title>
		<link>http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/06/tobacco-candy-greener-than-second-hand-smoke.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/06/tobacco-candy-greener-than-second-hand-smoke.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 03:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=64877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tobacco candy: it sounds disgusting (and probably is) but it's a lot better for the environment than cigarettes.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/06/tobacco-candy-greener-than-second-hand-smoke.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China tells officials to smoke for the economy</title>
		<link>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1177153/No-butts-China-orders-officials-smoke-230-000-packets-year-boost-economy-face-fined.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1177153/No-butts-China-orders-officials-smoke-230-000-packets-year-boost-economy-face-fined.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 03:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=55481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China's central province of Hubei is telling officials they must smoke nearly a quarter of a million packets of cigarettes -- to boost the economy -- or risk fines. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1177153/No-butts-China-orders-officials-smoke-230-000-packets-year-boost-economy-face-fined.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is pornography the new tobacco?</title>
		<link>http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/41599902.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/41599902.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 00:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taboos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=55093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Society's acceptance of widespread pornography appears very nearly bulletproof — every bit as bulletproof, in fact, as the prevailing laissez-faire public view of smoking did in 1963.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/41599902.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tobacco ad defense shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to protect junk food</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/24/tobacco-ad-defense-shouldnt-be-allowed-to-protect-junk-food/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/24/tobacco-ad-defense-shouldnt-be-allowed-to-protect-junk-food/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politcs government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The junk food industry is invoking the defense used by the tobacco industry in banning advertising to kids, and <b>Simon Chapman</b> argues they shouldn't be allowed to.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/24/tobacco-ad-defense-shouldnt-be-allowed-to-protect-junk-food/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where inflation hurts</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/16/where-inflation-hurts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/16/where-inflation-hurts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Price Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[household goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the election of 2004 the CPI has risen 8.3% but an actual decline in the cost of clothing and small rises in the cost of household goods and communications disguise the somewhat sharper rises in the price of food, alcohol and tobacco, rents, health and education, writes Richard Farmer.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/16/where-inflation-hurts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 763/854 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-11 23:44:14 -->
