<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; tobacco industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/tobacco-industry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What WAS Bronwyn Bishop smoking?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2011/08/15/what-was-bronwyn-bishop-smoking-reporting-from-the-inquiry-into-political-donations/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2011/08/15/what-was-bronwyn-bishop-smoking-reporting-from-the-inquiry-into-political-donations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bronwyn Bishop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political donations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=240982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tobacco industry is unlike any other donor as its products kill people – but this has not stopped all parties from accepting their generous donations. And it didn't stop Bronwyn Bishop harassing witnesses at a Joint Standing Committee inquiry last week, writes <b>Anne Jones</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2011/08/15/what-was-bronwyn-bishop-smoking-reporting-from-the-inquiry-into-political-donations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do public health advocates get more active in online discussion</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2011/05/09/how-representative-is-online-commentary-not-very-suggests-tobacco-study/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2011/05/09/how-representative-is-online-commentary-not-very-suggests-tobacco-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 23:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plain packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=221745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent study conducted by <b>Becky Freeman</b> found that those opposed to plain packaging cigarettes are much more likely to post responses online, despite public opinion polls showing strong support for tobacco control measures.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2011/05/09/how-representative-is-online-commentary-not-very-suggests-tobacco-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the tobacco industry is bad for public health (beyond the obvious reasons)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2011/03/02/why-the-tobacco-industry-is-bad-for-public-health-beyond-the-obvious-reasons/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2011/03/02/why-the-tobacco-industry-is-bad-for-public-health-beyond-the-obvious-reasons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 03:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=207427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everybody knows the basic reasons why the tobacco industry is bad for public health. But here are five examples of how tobacco giants block potentially important policies. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2011/03/02/why-the-tobacco-industry-is-bad-for-public-health-beyond-the-obvious-reasons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smokers revolt! How the cig tax will hurt the working folk</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/05/smokers-revolt-how-the-cig-tax-will-hurt-the-working-folk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/05/smokers-revolt-how-the-cig-tax-will-hurt-the-working-folk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 03:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Election 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=135788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smokers meet outside buildings across Australia and talk almost every day. Now they are talking of dumping the Rudd government, says <b>Lionel Elmore</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/05/smokers-revolt-how-the-cig-tax-will-hurt-the-working-folk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On ciggies, Australia the world leader in public health reform</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/30/on-ciggies-australia-the-world-leader-in-public-health-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/30/on-ciggies-australia-the-world-leader-in-public-health-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 03:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarette packagaing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigerettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco lobby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=134619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plain cigarette packaging was removed from the public health agenda in the '90s due to the threat of legal action. But in 2010, it seems governments won’t be so easily scared off by this legal hot air, write <b>Becky Freeman</b> and Professor <b>Simon Chapman</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/30/on-ciggies-australia-the-world-leader-in-public-health-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cigs up: just a puff of hot (smokey) air?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/30/cigs-up-just-a-puff-of-hot-smokey-air/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/30/cigs-up-just-a-puff-of-hot-smokey-air/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 23:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarette packagaing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarette prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=134504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Daily media wrap</b>: Australia has gone into a cigarette-buying frenzy, with news that smoke prices would jump 25% overnight. But is the country also buying into Rudd's ETS smokescreen?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/30/cigs-up-just-a-puff-of-hot-smokey-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Australia is more addicted to coal than tobacco</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/04/29/pity-the-coal-lobbyists-are-more-powerful-than-the-tobacco-lobbyists/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/04/29/pity-the-coal-lobbyists-are-more-powerful-than-the-tobacco-lobbyists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=134502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Kevin Rudd took on a powerful and hugely cashed-up lobby group -- too bad it was the tobacco lobby and not the coal industry, says <b>Tim Hollo</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2010/04/29/pity-the-coal-lobbyists-are-more-powerful-than-the-tobacco-lobbyists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preventative health lobby inflicting serious damage on our freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/29/preventative-health-lobby-inflicting-serious-damage-on-our-freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/29/preventative-health-lobby-inflicting-serious-damage-on-our-freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarette packagaing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Preventative Health Taskforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco excise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=134284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If smokers are not imposing any net cost on society, why are we endlessly assailing them and the companies that cater to their addictions?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/29/preventative-health-lobby-inflicting-serious-damage-on-our-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Draconian, perhaps, but changing fag packaging will work</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/29/draconian-perhaps-but-changing-fag-packaging-will-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/29/draconian-perhaps-but-changing-fag-packaging-will-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarette packagaing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=134255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the Rudd government is adopting the world's "most draconian" cigarette packaging regulations? Good, says <b>Nicholas Gruen</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/29/draconian-perhaps-but-changing-fag-packaging-will-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do plain cigarette packs stop people from smoking?</title>
		<link>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/17/6/416.full</link>
		<comments>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/17/6/416.full#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 02:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarette packagaing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarette packets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=134295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep, according to this 2008 study from the <em>British Medical Journal</em>'s <em>Tobacco Control</em> journal. Smokers presume cigarettes in plain packs will be "less rich in tobacco, less satisfying and of lower quality tobacco."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/17/6/416.full/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Rudd&#8217;s ETS woes go up in smoke?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/29/will-rudds-ets-woes-go-up-in-smoke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/29/will-rudds-ets-woes-go-up-in-smoke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarette advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarette packets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Budget 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Election 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=134150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Daily Media Wrap</b>: Less than two days after Rudd's ETS backflip, the government has pulled a sleight of hand: announcing it will introduce tough new laws for cigarette packets. Ta-da! Health is back on the national agenda. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/29/will-rudds-ets-woes-go-up-in-smoke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plain packs: tobacco industry bares its butts to bluff Rudd</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/05/plain-packs-tobacco-industry-bares-its-butts-to-bluff-rudd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/05/plain-packs-tobacco-industry-bares-its-butts-to-bluff-rudd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Chapman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health warnings on cigarette packets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preventive health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preventive Health Task Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=121118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is one easy, preventative health plan that Rudd could implement: forcing plain packaging of cigarettes. Plain packaging "can kill your business" says the tobacco industry. Precisely.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/05/plain-packs-tobacco-industry-bares-its-butts-to-bluff-rudd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Join in the hunt for dodgy tobacco marketing</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2010/02/17/want-to-help-the-hunt-for-dodgy-tobacco-online-marketing/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2010/02/17/want-to-help-the-hunt-for-dodgy-tobacco-online-marketing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Ad Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=117314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers from the University of Sydney are exploring how the tobacco industry is exploiting Facebook, Youtube and Twitter to promote its products. Help them in their hunt for social media smoking shame.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2010/02/17/want-to-help-the-hunt-for-dodgy-tobacco-online-marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British American Tobacco’s big numbers on illegal tobacco don’t add up</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/08/british-american-tobacco%e2%80%99s-big-numbers-on-illegal-tobacco-don%e2%80%99t-add-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/08/british-american-tobacco%e2%80%99s-big-numbers-on-illegal-tobacco-don%e2%80%99t-add-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Chapman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british american tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preventive Health Task Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking related deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=114878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia’s tobacco industry is having a major attack of the vapours following recommendations made by the government’s Preventive Health Task Force last year.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/08/british-american-tobacco%e2%80%99s-big-numbers-on-illegal-tobacco-don%e2%80%99t-add-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pfizer&#8217;s campaign to drug as many smokers as possible</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/pfizer%e2%80%99s-campaign-to-drug-as-many-smokers-as-possible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/pfizer%e2%80%99s-campaign-to-drug-as-many-smokers-as-possible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Champix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pfizer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[varenicline]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/pfizer%e2%80%99s-campaign-to-drug-as-many-smokers-as-possible/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer is running a major campaign to convince Australian smokers that they should not try to quit without taking anti-smoking medication, writes <b>Simon Chapman</b>. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/pfizer%e2%80%99s-campaign-to-drug-as-many-smokers-as-possible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taxing fags an unhealthy obsession</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/04/taxing-fags-an-unhealthy-obsession/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/04/taxing-fags-an-unhealthy-obsession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Preventative Health Taskforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sin tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/04/taxing-fags-an-unhealthy-obsession/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is more taxation the solution to Australia's "health crisis" -- if there even is a health crisis? asks <b>Sinclair Davidson</b>. The medical profession may get more money, but there's no reason to believe it will solve the smoking or alcohol crisis.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/04/taxing-fags-an-unhealthy-obsession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Tobacco sues to keep ciggie packets smoker-friendly</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/09/01/tobacco-industry-sues-to-protect-its-first-amendment-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/09/01/tobacco-industry-sues-to-protect-its-first-amendment-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 01:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=83561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Australia, graphic anti-smoking photos on cigarette packets are now the norm. President Obama has signed a law for similar requirements in the US. But the tobacco industry is fighting back -- with the first amendment.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/09/01/tobacco-industry-sues-to-protect-its-first-amendment-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health insurers have $4.5bn invested in Big Tobacco</title>
		<link>http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/60-second-science/post.cfm?id=health-insurers-want-you-to-keep-sm-2009-06-03</link>
		<comments>http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/60-second-science/post.cfm?id=health-insurers-want-you-to-keep-sm-2009-06-03#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 07:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=65053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harvard doctors investigated the stock interests of health and life insurance companies, and found they have nearly $4.5 billion invested in tobacco stocks.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/60-second-science/post.cfm?id=health-insurers-want-you-to-keep-sm-2009-06-03/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surgery is not the solution to obesity epidemic</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/04/surgery-is-not-the-solution-to-obesity-epidemic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/04/surgery-is-not-the-solution-to-obesity-epidemic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Sweet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk food advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity epidemic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/04/surgery-is-not-the-solution-to-obesity-epidemic/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House of Reps committee wimped out on making a strong call to action for some bold obesity prevention policies -- like tougher regulation of food formulation and a ban on junk food advertising to kids, writes <b>Melissa Sweet</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/04/surgery-is-not-the-solution-to-obesity-epidemic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why increasing tobacco taxes is good for the poor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2009/06/02/why-increasing-tobacco-taxes-is-good-for-the-poor/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2009/06/02/why-increasing-tobacco-taxes-is-good-for-the-poor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=63788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research shows the poor and the young are responsive to increases in cigarette prices, says <b>Simon Chapman</b> -- when cigs go up, they smoke less and are more likely to quit.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2009/06/02/why-increasing-tobacco-taxes-is-good-for-the-poor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nicotine addicted fast food, coming to a TV near you</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/18/nicotine-addicted-fast-food-coming-to-a-tv-near-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/18/nicotine-addicted-fast-food-coming-to-a-tv-near-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 03:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Ad Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition on Food Advertising to Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=59163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Coalition on Food Advertising to Children's has comissioned a self-described "viral" ad to lobby the Australian Government to ban junk food advertising to kids. But does it work?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/18/nicotine-addicted-fast-food-coming-to-a-tv-near-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Big Food is copying Big Tobacco</title>
		<link>http://www.alternet.org/healthwellness/135965/big_food_is_copying_big_tobacco%27s_disinformation_tactics%2C_how_many_will_die_this_time_/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alternet.org/healthwellness/135965/big_food_is_copying_big_tobacco%27s_disinformation_tactics%2C_how_many_will_die_this_time_/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Ad Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk food advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yum! Brands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=51270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers say the US food industry is employing the same legal, political and business strategies previously utilised by Big Tobacco, and the health consequences could be dire.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alternet.org/healthwellness/135965/big_food_is_copying_big_tobacco%27s_disinformation_tactics%2C_how_many_will_die_this_time_/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberals&#8217; lucrative love affair with big tobacco</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/12/12/liberals-lucrative-love-affair-with-big-tobacco/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/12/12/liberals-lucrative-love-affair-with-big-tobacco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brendan Nelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Hockey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NSW Liberal Party continues to accept donations from tobacco companies despite both Malcolm Turnbull and Joe Hockey urging people to quit smoking, writes <b>Bernard Keane</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/12/12/liberals-lucrative-love-affair-with-big-tobacco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mission Australia under fire for tobacco links</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/27/mission-australia-under-fire-for-tobacco-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/27/mission-australia-under-fire-for-tobacco-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco lobby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mission Australia’s concerns about young people and drugs are no doubt genuine, but would be much more credible if they were not themselves associated with leading drug-peddlers, writes <b>Mike Daube</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/27/mission-australia-under-fire-for-tobacco-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Qantas giving big tobacco the executive treatment?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/17/is-qantas-giving-big-tobacco-the-executive-treatment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/17/is-qantas-giving-big-tobacco-the-executive-treatment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qantas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Qantas' recent executive appointment linked to the airline's decision to sell ciagarettes duty-free on flights? <b>Glenn Dyer</b> poses the question.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/17/is-qantas-giving-big-tobacco-the-executive-treatment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1606/1868 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 00:59:42 -->
