<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Time&#8217;s Person of the Year: Mark Zuckerberg</title>
		<link>http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2036683_2037183,00.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2036683_2037183,00.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 01:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zuckberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=193407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A perhaps unlikely pick for the annual Person of the Year by <em>Time</em> magazine, but Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg created a social network so large that if it was a country, it would be the world's third largest. And he's only 26.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2036683_2037183,00.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time for a paywall?</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/07/time-magazine-putting-up-a-paywall-to-protect-print/</link>
		<comments>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/07/time-magazine-putting-up-a-paywall-to-protect-print/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 01:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=151188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <em>Time</em> it is a'changing, with stories now cut short online, telling readers to either check out the print edition or the paid edition on their iPads. Is this a paywall without a door?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/07/time-magazine-putting-up-a-paywall-to-protect-print/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet hijackers: stealing content and avoiding blame</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/28/business/media/28carr.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/28/business/media/28carr.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 02:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rolling Stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanley McChrystal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=149207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why did Time.com and Politico, two well respected news sites, completely violate copyright and publish the infamous <em>Rolling Stone</em> <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/17390/119236">McChrystal profile</a> on their sites? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/28/business/media/28carr.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s not that Newsweek is bad &#8212; it&#8217;s that TIME is better</title>
		<link>http://blogs.hbr.org/hbr/hbreditors/2010/05/newsweeks_decline_why_companies_need_rivals.html</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.hbr.org/hbr/hbreditors/2010/05/newsweeks_decline_why_companies_need_rivals.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=137273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ailing newsweekly <em>Newsweek</em>'s biggest problem is that it's coming second in a two-horse-race with <em>TIME</em> magazine, says <b>Dan McGinn</b>. Both rags would actually be better off with <em>more</em> competitors.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.hbr.org/hbr/hbreditors/2010/05/newsweeks_decline_why_companies_need_rivals.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A talk with the editor of Time</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/31/katienancy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/31/katienancy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 02:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video of the Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Gibbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=127411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting interview by Katie Couric with Nancy Gibbs, the executive editor of Time magazine. Nancy talks her top cover stories, the benefits of online vs. print and the future of journalism. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/31/katienancy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What your taste in magazines says about you</title>
		<link>http://jezebel.com/5432161/what-your-favorite-magazine-says-about-you</link>
		<comments>http://jezebel.com/5432161/what-your-favorite-magazine-says-about-you#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stupidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vogue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=108030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Jezebel</em> shamelessly (yet hilariously and accurately) stereotypes various magazines' readerships. <em>Vogue</em>? "People who use the names of seasons as verbs". <em>Time</em>? "People waiting to get a colonoscopy". ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jezebel.com/5432161/what-your-favorite-magazine-says-about-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ben Bernanke: Time&#8216;s Person of the Year 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1946375_1947251,00.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1946375_1947251,00.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[person of the year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=106464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Time</em> magazine has named US Federal Reserve chief Ben Bernanke as its Person of the Year for 2009, lauding him as "the most powerful nerd on the planet". Well, at least it wasn't <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/11/twitter-person-of-the-year/">bloody Twitter</a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1946375_1947251,00.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time&#8216;s 2009 Person of the Year: the nominees</title>
		<link>http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1939691_1939704,00.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1939691_1939704,00.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[person of the year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=105810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Time</em> has revealed the 2009 nominees for its coveted title of Person of the Year. This year's list ranged from the obvious -- Obama, Bernanke -- to some more left-field suggestions like the Somali Pirates and Iran Protesters.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1939691_1939704,00.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 2000s: Worst. Decade. Ever.</title>
		<link>http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1942834,00.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1942834,00.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noughties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=101499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>TIME</em>'s latest cover story has <em>slightly</em> controversially labeled the Noughties "The Decade From Hell", with 9/11 at one end, and financial disaster at the other. A look back at a decade of depression, disasters, despots and doom.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1942834,00.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rival publishers unite to create iTunes for magazines &#8212; but who&#8217;s buying?</title>
		<link>http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/11/time_conde_hearst_to_create_an_itunes_for_magazines.php</link>
		<comments>http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/11/time_conde_hearst_to_create_an_itunes_for_magazines.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hearst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=101162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Magazine publishers Hearst, Time Inc and Conde Nast are joining forces to create an "iTunes for magazines" -- a online storefront for digital versions of their titles and articles. But they can't sell a product that's already free... are those paywalls we can see looming on the horizon?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/11/time_conde_hearst_to_create_an_itunes_for_magazines.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What will it take to get people paying for online news?</title>
		<link>http://www.thewrap.com/article/future-paid-content-10673</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewrap.com/article/future-paid-content-10673#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=100807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's movement at the station: Rupe is dumping Google, <a href="http://www.journalismonline.com/home.php">Journalism Online</a> has 1200 publishers on-board, and <em>Time</em> <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20090616/time-inc-ceo-ann-moore-lets-put-the-digital-genie-back-in-the-bottle/">is creating</a> an iTunes for magazine articles. What's next on the path to making paywalls prosperous?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewrap.com/article/future-paid-content-10673/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time&#8216;s nerdy new tech site</title>
		<link>http://www.minonline.com/news/Time-com-Techland-Promises-Nerd-vana_12734.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.minonline.com/news/Time-com-Techland-Promises-Nerd-vana_12734.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=99704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Time</em> has taken a gamble by entering the already bloated market of tech sites with its new venture <a href="http://techland.com/">Techland</a>. Can it really bring anything new to the web? It sure is purty. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.minonline.com/news/Time-com-Techland-Promises-Nerd-vana_12734.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Twitter be Time&#8216;s Person of the Year?</title>
		<link>http://www.foliomag.com/2009/could-time-name-twitter-person-year</link>
		<comments>http://www.foliomag.com/2009/could-time-name-twitter-person-year#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[person of the year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=98935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter is emerging as the hot favourite amongst pundits as the hot favourite to be named <em>Time</em> magazine's 2009 Person of the Year. We can just see the world's social media experts wetting themselves already.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.foliomag.com/2009/could-time-name-twitter-person-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>50 years of TIME in Australia (and a few less-important islands, too)</title>
		<link>http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1930464_1930466_1933232,00.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1930464_1930466_1933232,00.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eddie mabo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germaine Greer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert menzies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Flannery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victor Chang]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=96220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>TIME</em> magazine is celebrating 50 years of publication in Australia (well, the "South Pacific", but it pretty much ignores everyone else), including a tribute to its pick of most influential Aussies of the last five decades: <a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1930464_1930466_1930472,00.html">Robert Menzies</a>, <a href=:http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1930464_1930466_1930456,00.html">Germaine Greer</a>, <a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1930464_1930466_1931703,00.html">Victor Chang</a>, <a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1930464_1930466_1932947,00.html">Eddie Mabo</a>, and <a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1930464_1930466_1932972,00.html">Tim Flannery</a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1930464_1930466_1933232,00.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TIME.com Diggs up traffic</title>
		<link>http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/digital/e3i2a5df3fecd0d1783245c71a75e0fd384</link>
		<comments>http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/digital/e3i2a5df3fecd0d1783245c71a75e0fd384#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 03:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social bookmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=83307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The popularity of <em>TIME</em> articles on social bookmarking site <a href="http://www.digg.com">Digg</a> has seen the traffic to the magazine's website balloon by 41% over the last year. Maybe link aggregation isn't killing traditional news organisations after all?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/digital/e3i2a5df3fecd0d1783245c71a75e0fd384/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turning TIME magazine into TIME.com</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/25/timecom-editor-long-form-journalism-doesnt-work-online/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/25/timecom-editor-long-form-journalism-doesnt-work-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Tyrangiel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=81740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fascinating interview with Josh Tyrangiel, Managing Editor of <em>TIME.com</em>, who explains why some of the print magazine's best content just doesn't work online, and how their online journalists and editors tighten and rewrite articles in a way that <em>does</em> fit the medium. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/25/timecom-editor-long-form-journalism-doesnt-work-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TIME practises what it preaches with frugal photography</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/print/times-30-cover-photo-cheap-now-expensive-later/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/print/times-30-cover-photo-cheap-now-expensive-later/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 03:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=77272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photographer Robert Lam was excited when a stock photo he snapped made the cover of <em>TIME</em> magazine, until he found out the going rate for the mag's cover shot is usually in the thousands of dollars -- and he got $30. The cover story in question? "The New Frugality". ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/print/times-30-cover-photo-cheap-now-expensive-later/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This will hurt your brain: time is slowing down, apparently</title>
		<link>http://breakingnews.ie/world/bizarre-theory-suggests-time-may-be-running-out-341140.html#ixzz0MWtLTqUL</link>
		<comments>http://breakingnews.ie/world/bizarre-theory-suggests-time-may-be-running-out-341140.html#ixzz0MWtLTqUL#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black hole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=76446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A decade ago, measurements of the light from distant exploding stars showed the universe to be expanding at an accelerating rate.
Physicists gave it the name “dark energy”. But a new theory suggests we've been fooled ... because time itself is slowing down. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://breakingnews.ie/world/bizarre-theory-suggests-time-may-be-running-out-341140.html#ixzz0MWtLTqUL/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TIME&#8217;s top 25 blogs for 2009: the good, the bad, the inexplicable</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/21/times-top-25-blogs-for-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/21/times-top-25-blogs-for-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 03:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=74955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>TIME</em> magazine has once again ranked named their most and least favourite blogs for the year. We take a look at who made the cut.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/21/times-top-25-blogs-for-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The art of reel time</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/culture-mulcher/2009/07/16/time-life-movies/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/culture-mulcher/2009/07/16/time-life-movies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>W H Chong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film & TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=74216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>WH Chong</b> stops the clock to explore how films -- from <em>State of Play</em> to <em>Samson &#038; Delilah</em> -- convey time. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/culture-mulcher/2009/07/16/time-life-movies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Death of the newsweekly?</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200907/news-magazines</link>
		<comments>http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200907/news-magazines#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsweeklies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=67796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is it that <em>Time</em> and <em>Newsweek</em> are faltering, while a notionally similar weekly news digest -- <em>The Economist</em> -- is thriving?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200907/news-magazines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 10 most absurd Time covers</title>
		<link>http://reason.com/news/show/134038.html</link>
		<comments>http://reason.com/news/show/134038.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=66192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Satanism to Pokemon, <em>Reason</em> gathers 10 of the most "horrifying, silly, irresponsible, or downright ridiculous' <em>Time</em> magazine covers of the last 40 years.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://reason.com/news/show/134038.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Inc publishing arm edges closer to midnight</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/30/time-inc-publishing-arm-edges-closer-to-midnight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/30/time-inc-publishing-arm-edges-closer-to-midnight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Dyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warner Bros]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=54378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The overall result from the huge Time Warner media conglomerate overshadowed the wrecking ball looming over Time's publishing business.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/30/time-inc-publishing-arm-edges-closer-to-midnight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Time and Newsweek will never be The Economist</title>
		<link>http://www.vanityfair.com/online/politics/2009/04/when-will-magazines-stop-trying-to-copy-the-economist.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.vanityfair.com/online/politics/2009/04/when-will-magazines-stop-trying-to-copy-the-economist.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=52659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["We're going to turn things around by being like <i>The Economist</i>" may be the most overused magazine cliché, but trying to emulate the mag is a fool's errand. <i>Vanity Fair</i> explain why.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vanityfair.com/online/politics/2009/04/when-will-magazines-stop-trying-to-copy-the-economist.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1589/1842 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-11 19:19:09 -->
