<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; senate inquiry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/senate-inquiry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>National Security Legislation: worst discussion paper ever.</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/17/national-security-legislation-worst-discussion-paper-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/17/national-security-legislation-worst-discussion-paper-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Federal Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Rundle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security Legislation Discussion Paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate inquiry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/17/national-security-legislation-worst-discussion-paper-ever/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Security Legislation Discussion Paper was released last week. And it may be one of the worst discussion papers ever, with no structure, barebones commentary and lots of blank pages.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/17/national-security-legislation-worst-discussion-paper-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mr Toad must resign!</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/22/first-dog-on-the-moon-340/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/22/first-dog-on-the-moon-340/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Firstdog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[First Dog on the Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e.h. shepard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Godwin Grech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kenneth grahame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mr toad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utegate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind in the willows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/22/first-dog-on-the-moon-340/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Godwin Grech had been working very hard...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/22/first-dog-on-the-moon-340/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What did the AEC say about electoral law changes? Don’t ask</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/23/what-did-the-aec-say-about-electoral-law-changes-dont-ask/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/23/what-did-the-aec-say-about-electoral-law-changes-dont-ask/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all internal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Electoral Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of information request]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate inquiry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can’t tell you what our advice to the government was because it might be controversial. Essentially, that’s the response from the Australian Electoral Commission to a Freedom of Information request I made earlier this year, writes Peter Browne, editor of Australian Policy Online.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/23/what-did-the-aec-say-about-electoral-law-changes-dont-ask/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SBS: a Brown study of sad decline</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/31/sbs-a-brown-study-of-sad-decline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/31/sbs-a-brown-study-of-sad-decline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bipartisan senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul cutler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public broadcaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate inquiry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have to marvel at the ability of Shaun Brown to attempt to hoodwink the press in his address at the National Press Club this week and his advertorials in the Sydney Morning Herald. 

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/31/sbs-a-brown-study-of-sad-decline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family First joins the Crikey crusade, Labor bags itself</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/17/family-first-joins-the-crikey-crusade-labor-bags-itself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/17/family-first-joins-the-crikey-crusade-labor-bags-itself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crikey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Latham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Garrett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate inquiry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crikey’s campaign against legally dubious bank penalty fees has finally gained some political traction as Family First's Steve Fielding pushes our barrow all the way to a Senate inquiry. What's strange about that is that it's Family First which has taken up the running on the issue, writes Michael Pascoe.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/17/family-first-joins-the-crikey-crusade-labor-bags-itself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
