<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; search engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/search-engines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Santorum&#8217;s presidential hopes face a sticky problem</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/07/santorums-presidential-hopes-face-a-sticky-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/07/santorums-presidential-hopes-face-a-sticky-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 02:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 US elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican candidates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=227732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rick Santorum is running for president? Hah! The religious right of the Republicans might reckon they've found their man in this confrontationist conservative former senator from Pennsylvania, but did they check Google?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/07/santorums-presidential-hopes-face-a-sticky-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Google blacklist</title>
		<link>http://www.2600.com/googleblacklist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.2600.com/googleblacklist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google autocomplete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Instant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=177138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Type a word into Google and watch the Google instant search immediately start filtering items letter by letter. But some words -- think swear words, porn or anything possibly insulting -- doesn't show any autocomplete options. Check out which words get censored...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.2600.com/googleblacklist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BP is here to help, Google told me so</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Broadcast/bp-buys-search-engine-phrases-redirecting-users/story?id=10835618&#038;page=2</link>
		<comments>http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Broadcast/bp-buys-search-engine-phrases-redirecting-users/story?id=10835618&#038;page=2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf of Mexico oil spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=144763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BP is spending $10,000 a day buying out the top adwords on "oil spill" searches on Google. Although it is PR genius, is BP's manipulation of the information super-highway obstructing the real news?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Broadcast/bp-buys-search-engine-phrases-redirecting-users/story?id=10835618&#038;page=2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Startpage: a &#8216;private&#8217; search engine, but who’ll care?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/06/01/startpage-a-private-search-engine-but-who%e2%80%99ll-care/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/06/01/startpage-a-private-search-engine-but-who%e2%80%99ll-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 04:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Startpage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=142769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite calling itself "popular", Startpage isn’t in Nielsen’s top 10 US search sites, which means it’d have less than 0.3% of the search market share. So can it manage to become the new Google?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/06/01/startpage-a-private-search-engine-but-who%e2%80%99ll-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Google employee: How Facebook will crush Google</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/15/facebook-google/</link>
		<comments>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/15/facebook-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 23:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of the internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=139227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former "Googler" <b>Bindu Reddy</b> explains why Facebook will usurp Google as the world's top internet company -- just as Google did to Microsoft, and Microsoft did to Netscape. Google is about searching, Facebook is about discovery.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/15/facebook-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google gets a Microsoft make-over</title>
		<link>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/google_steps_gingerly_toward_search_as_application</link>
		<comments>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/google_steps_gingerly_toward_search_as_application#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 02:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of the internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=136155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has undergone a face-lift -- and it looks suspiciously like Microsoft's Bing. It won't change your search results, says search guru <b>John Battelle</b> but it will change the <em>way</em> we search.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://battellemedia.com/archives/2010/05/google_steps_gingerly_toward_search_as_application/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game on, Google: Apple enters the search business</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-just-got-into-the-search-business-2010-4</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-just-got-into-the-search-business-2010-4#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siri]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=134281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple has just bought out mobile app maker <a href="http://siri.com/">Siri</a>. But this isn't just another business acquisition, says <em>Business Insider</em>: it heralds the company's entrance into the search market.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-just-got-into-the-search-business-2010-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google maps government censorship requests around the world</title>
		<link>http://www.google.com/governmentrequests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.google.com/governmentrequests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revealed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=132152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google reveals -- via Google Maps, naturally -- the number requests to censor content received from governments worldwide, in six months alone. Brazil tops the list, though a big red question mark still hangs over China.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.google.com/governmentrequests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The countries Google is still censoring</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinsider.com/google-censorship-2010-3</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessinsider.com/google-censorship-2010-3#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 04:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=126973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has been <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/mar/24/google-china-sergey-brin-censorship">galloping about</a> on its moral high horse since it stopped censoring search results in China -- but it's still censoring results in many other countries, reveals <em>Business Insider</em>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessinsider.com/google-censorship-2010-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China&#8217;s instructions on reporting on Google</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/24/AR2010032402511_pf.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/24/AR2010032402511_pf.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=126348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Straight from the Ministry of Truth: the <em>WashPo</em> has a leaked copy of the Chinese government's instructions to news sites on how to report on Google's decision to stop censoring its search results. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/24/AR2010032402511_pf.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google: We no longer hate freedom</title>
		<link>http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/new-approach-to-china-update.html</link>
		<comments>http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/new-approach-to-china-update.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=125368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has officially stopped censoring its searches in China today. The company's Senior Vice President <b>David Drummond</b> explains how and why they did it.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/new-approach-to-china-update.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real reason Google has turned on China</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2010/01/12/google%E2%80%99s-china-stance-more-about-business-than-thwarting-evil/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techcrunch.com/2010/01/12/google%E2%80%99s-china-stance-more-about-business-than-thwarting-evil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=109538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's nice to see Google finally adhering to its ethos of "do-no-evil" in China -- but the company's decision end its censorship of Google.cn has far more to do with business than human rights, says <b>Sarah Lacy</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techcrunch.com/2010/01/12/google%E2%80%99s-china-stance-more-about-business-than-thwarting-evil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google ends censorship in China</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2010/01/13/google-may-pull-out-of-china-following-attempt-to-access-human-rights-emails/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2010/01/13/google-may-pull-out-of-china-following-attempt-to-access-human-rights-emails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=109533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has announced that it will no longer consent to censoring its search engine results in China, and, if necessary, will pull out of the country altogether. This is huge, says <b>Margaret Simons</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2010/01/13/google-may-pull-out-of-china-following-attempt-to-access-human-rights-emails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google: No more censorship in China</title>
		<link>http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html</link>
		<comments>http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=109317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following a massive cyber attack on Google in China -- part of a broader attempt to access the personal details of Chinese human rights activists -- the search giant says it will no longer censor search results on Google.cn -- and may pull out of the country altogether.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter finally turns a profit</title>
		<link>http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2009/tc20091220_549879.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2009/tc20091220_549879.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inside info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-time web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=107604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter's real-time search deals with Microsoft and Google -- worth about $25 million combined -- will see the company <em>finally</em> turn a (small) profit this year, according to company insiders. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2009/tc20091220_549879.htm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s Examiner.com and why is it always in my Google searches?</title>
		<link>http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1946348,00.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1946348,00.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Examiner.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=104722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you use Google (and you do), chances are you frequently get results from <em>Examiner.com</em> -- even though the articles are, frankly, a bit shit. So what's the site doing at the top of all your search queries? <em>Time</em> explains the technical trickery.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1946348,00.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google unveils its visual search engine</title>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/article/183933/a_handson_tour_google_goggles_visual_search.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcworld.com/article/183933/a_handson_tour_google_goggles_visual_search.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Goggles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=104145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has just unveiled its latest search innovation: <a href="http://www.google.com/mobile/goggles/#landmark">Google Goggles</a> allows users to take pictures of books, brands, business logos, text and more on their phones, then search for more info. Like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shazam_%28service%29">Shazam</a> for the entire world.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcworld.com/article/183933/a_handson_tour_google_goggles_visual_search.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google to roll-out real-time search</title>
		<link>http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-10410599-265.html</link>
		<comments>http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-10410599-265.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-time web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=104067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10380615-36.html?tag=mncol;txt">Google's deal with Twitter</a>? The web giant's real-time search is finally ready to go live, but it's much bigger than just social media...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-10410599-265.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From the lemon detox diet to Catriona Rowntree&#8217;s baby: the top Aussie Google searches of the year</title>
		<link>http://google-au.blogspot.com/2009/12/top-aussie-searches-of-year.html</link>
		<comments>http://google-au.blogspot.com/2009/12/top-aussie-searches-of-year.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 05:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MasterChef Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=103485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Australia name the top words, celebrities, news stories, albums, movies and more that Aussies were seeking out this year. Spoiler: <em>MasterChef</em>-related terms feature heavily. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://google-au.blogspot.com/2009/12/top-aussie-searches-of-year.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft vs. Google, round 567: Bing Maps launched</title>
		<link>http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/183571/microsofts_bing_tries_to_leapfrog_google_maps.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/183571/microsofts_bing_tries_to_leapfrog_google_maps.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=102839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has fired the latest shot in the search engine wars, launching its own map service to compete directly with Google Maps. Bing Maps lets users view satellite maps in 3D, and integrate apps like Twitter to overlay extra data.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/183571/microsofts_bing_tries_to_leapfrog_google_maps.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The most searched words of 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_search_queries_of_2009.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_search_queries_of_2009.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 04:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=102746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What was the internet searching for in 2009? <em>ReadWriteWeb checks out the year's top search terms for Google and Bing. Why are so many people searching for Twitter? How hard is "www.twitter.com" to remember?</em>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_search_queries_of_2009.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has Murdoch just saved the newspaper industry?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/11/23/did-murdoch-just-figure-out-how-to-save-the-newspaper-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/11/23/did-murdoch-just-figure-out-how-to-save-the-newspaper-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=100405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The newspaper industry is desperate for cash, and Microsoft -- and its search engine Bing -- has bucketloads of it to spend. Can newspapers save themselves by selling the tech giant exclusive rights to their content?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.barrons.com/techtraderdaily/2009/11/23/did-murdoch-just-figure-out-how-to-save-the-newspaper-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murdoch puts a gun to Google&#8217;s head, Microsoft helps pull the trigger</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/22/bing-tries-to-buy-the-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/22/bing-tries-to-buy-the-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=100400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch has been threatening to pull all News Corp content from Google, and Microsoft is willing to pay him to do it. But Bing can't buy <em>all</em> the news -- and it might just sell its credibility in the process.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/22/bing-tries-to-buy-the-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kristof: Microsoft&#8217;s Bing is a Chinese propaganda tool</title>
		<link>http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/boycott-microsoft-bing/</link>
		<comments>http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/boycott-microsoft-bing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=100103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>NYT</em> columnist <b>Nicholas Kristof</b> is calling on his readers to boycott Microsoft's Bing search engine, because it actively censors search results in China on politically sensitive topics like Tienanmen Square and Tibet. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/boycott-microsoft-bing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Murdoch can really hurt Google</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/13/murdoch-google-bing-mexicanstandoff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/13/murdoch-google-bing-mexicanstandoff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=98949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch's recent rejection of Google may be less about news content and more about the search engine wars, suggests <b>Michael Arrington</b>: by de-indexing from Google, other search engines could pay <em>him</em> for the rights to index News Corp content.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/13/murdoch-google-bing-mexicanstandoff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1708/1950 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 04:53:01 -->
