<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:30:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The science of Chinese whispers gone wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/the-science-of-chinese-whispers-gone-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/the-science-of-chinese-whispers-gone-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Science journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media hoax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/the-science-of-chinese-whispers-gone-wrong/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It all started when Reuters published a story about the positive cognitive effects of bad moods. Too bad the "study" doesn't exist and neither does the journal it reportedly comes from, says science blogger <b>Michael Slezak</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/05/the-science-of-chinese-whispers-gone-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big bang boffins&#8217; black hole to swallow earth on Wednesday</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/08/big-bang-boffins-black-hole-to-swallow-earth-on-wednesday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/08/big-bang-boffins-black-hole-to-swallow-earth-on-wednesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black hole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The world will be destroyed on Wednesday, writes <b>Neil Walker</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/08/big-bang-boffins-black-hole-to-swallow-earth-on-wednesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crikey essay: The fiction of impartial Australian science</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/12/crikey-essay-the-fiction-of-impartial-australian-science/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/12/crikey-essay-the-fiction-of-impartial-australian-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research institutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our society lives with a couple of open fictions. One of those fictions is the idea that science is impartial, that it can be relied upon to form the best possible basis for public policy, writes <b>Ben Gilna</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/12/crikey-essay-the-fiction-of-impartial-australian-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 8 bad meta-arguments against global warming</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/13/the-8-bad-meta-arguments-against-global-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/13/the-8-bad-meta-arguments-against-global-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doomsday scenarios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Diamond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the science fails, anti-global warming irrationalists resort to meta-arguments. And that’s where the thinking gets really bad.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/13/the-8-bad-meta-arguments-against-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
