<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; ronald reagan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/ronald-reagan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What difference do political speeches make?</title>
		<link>http://bigthink.com/ideas/40154</link>
		<comments>http://bigthink.com/ideas/40154#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 22:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronald reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=246338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama is regarded as a great communicator. But to what extent do political speeches make a real difference in terms of passing policy and gathering public support? asks <b>Robert de Neufville</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bigthink.com/ideas/40154/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Come in Spinner: royal wedding a traditional PR framing device</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/06/come-in-spinner-royal-wedding-a-traditional-pr-framing-device/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/06/come-in-spinner-royal-wedding-a-traditional-pr-framing-device/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 03:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noel Turnbull</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Howard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronald reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victorian Liberals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=221484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent royal wedding is instructive for many reasons, but probably mainly for illustrating the effectiveness of using tradition as a framing device.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/06/come-in-spinner-royal-wedding-a-traditional-pr-framing-device/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rundle: Obama baptised in blood, reborn as tribal member</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/04/rundle-obama-baptised-in-blood-reborn-as-tribal-member/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/04/rundle-obama-baptised-in-blood-reborn-as-tribal-member/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 03:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy Rundle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guy Rundle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abe Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barak obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osama bin laden dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronald reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheikh Khalid Mohammed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=220936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama is now a foreign policy president, a war president. Having knocked the wannabee Republicans out of the park, he is now aiming to take out Gaddafi, at which point, in the American imagery, he will join seamlessly with Reagan. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/04/rundle-obama-baptised-in-blood-reborn-as-tribal-member/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even Reagan isn&#8217;t enough of a Reaganite</title>
		<link>http://www.newsweek.com/id/237737</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsweek.com/id/237737#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 04:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush Jr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george bush snr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronald reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=138817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republican Party has launched so far to the hard right that none of the modern Republican presidents -- not Reagan nor Nixon nor Dubya -- would be able to be elected today.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsweek.com/id/237737/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A history of US Presidential bookworms</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/15/AR2010041503706.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/15/AR2010041503706.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronald reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=132631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama is well known as a "reader" -- but he's hardly the first US President to bury his nose in a book: Nixon loved Tolstoy, Reagen studied the ideas of Milton Friedman, and Clinton liked the "cheap thrill" of a mystery novel.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/15/AR2010041503706.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PHOTO GALLERY: Beauty queens, bowling and bunnies: US presidents like you&#8217;ve never seen them before</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/42829</link>
		<comments>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/42829#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 06:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[former presidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo galleries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronald reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=106445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From President Truman's summer wardrobe -- mainly Hawaiian shirts and pastel shorts -- to Reagan surrounded by 80s supermodels and LBJ singing to his dogs, take an inside peek inside the secret world of US presidents.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/42829/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rundle: The death of the neo-cons</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/21/rundle-the-death-of-the-neo-cons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/21/rundle-the-death-of-the-neo-cons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy Rundle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guy Rundle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush Jr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irving Kristol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neo cons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neo conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronald reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William F Buckley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/21/rundle-the-death-of-the-neo-cons/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though neoconservatives came to most people's attention during the Dubya era, their imperial purple was undoubtedly the Reagan years. The death of Irving Kristol rules a line across one era of the American intellectual right. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/21/rundle-the-death-of-the-neo-cons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goldman Sachs is bad for America</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/opinion/17krugman.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/opinion/17krugman.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronald reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=74408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs' over-the-top profit results highlights the hypocrisy haunting Wall St, writes the venerable <b>Paul Krugman</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/17/opinion/17krugman.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama embraces Reagan; Republicans suddenly less keen</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/14/weekinreview/14harwood.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/14/weekinreview/14harwood.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronald reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=67052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama has been quite generous in his praise of Ronald Reagan of late, while Republicans have suddenly begun reassessing whether Reagan is the best role-model to follow as they seek a path back to power.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/14/weekinreview/14harwood.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t blame Reagan for recession</title>
		<link>http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090615/scheer</link>
		<comments>http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090615/scheer#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 23:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronald reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=65158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How could Paul Krugman, winner of the Nobel Prize in economics and author of generally excellent columns in <em>The New York Times</em>, get it so wrong? asks <strong>Robert Scheer</strong>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090615/scheer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Krugman: the Reagan wrong turn that left us stuffed</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/01/opinion/01krugman.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/01/opinion/01krugman.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 02:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronald reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=63569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The more you look at it, the more it's clear that Ronald Reagan is to blame for the global financial crisis. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/01/opinion/01krugman.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American Idol: Obama&#8217;s TV ratings success</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/01/23/american-idol-obamas-tv-ratings-success/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/01/23/american-idol-obamas-tv-ratings-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush Jr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronald reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US08]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama continues to be the biggest drawcard in US apart from the Super Bowl. He's certainly a bigger drawcard than Fox TV's American Idol, writes <b>Glenn Dyer</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/01/23/american-idol-obamas-tv-ratings-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Misleading US election &#8220;facts&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/05/misleading-us-election-facts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/05/misleading-us-election-facts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Bush Jr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronald reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US08]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With no strong third party this time, a simple ‘doing of the math’ tells you that if Obama beats McCain by anything more than a few points, he will get over half the vote, writes <b>Peter Brent</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/05/misleading-us-election-facts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hot Chips! The Truth!</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/22/first-dog-on-the-moon-58/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/22/first-dog-on-the-moon-58/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Firstdog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[First Dog on the Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george clooney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margaret Thatcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronald reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Garnaut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seagulls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/22/first-dog-on-the-moon-58/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Crikey expose with George Clooney]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/22/first-dog-on-the-moon-58/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drug testing MPs and the Shultz defence</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/06/25/drug-testing-mps-and-the-shultz-defence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/06/25/drug-testing-mps-and-the-shultz-defence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Heffernan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronald reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urine test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Sunday, Senator Bill Heffernan called for random testing of politicians for illegal drugs. Heffernan claimed that the tests would send a message "that we are fair dinkum serious about stamping out drug use".]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/06/25/drug-testing-mps-and-the-shultz-defence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1164/1329 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 00:43:40 -->
