<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; Robert McClelland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/robert-mcclelland/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A dumb reshuffle puts spotlight back on Gillard&#8217;s woes</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/13/a-dumb-reshuffle-puts-spotlight-back-on-gillards-woes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/13/a-dumb-reshuffle-puts-spotlight-back-on-gillards-woes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 01:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Shorten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gllard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Arbib]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reshuffle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=264789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Julia Gillard's federal cabinet reshuffle -- promoting Bill Shorten and Mark Arbib while sacking good ministers -- again demonstrates her lack of judgment and fragility.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/13/a-dumb-reshuffle-puts-spotlight-back-on-gillards-woes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>203</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attorney-General Roxon&#8217;s to-do list</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/13/crikey-says-attorney-general-roxons-to-do-list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/13/crikey-says-attorney-general-roxons-to-do-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 01:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General's office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybercrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicola Roxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=264770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nicola Roxon's appointment as Australia's first female Attorney-General presents several opportunities to address issues handled poorly by Robert McClelland. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/13/crikey-says-attorney-general-roxons-to-do-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transparency please! Why the tax breaks for pokies clubs?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/27/clubs-australia-campaignand-pokies-revenue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/27/clubs-australia-campaignand-pokies-revenue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Eltham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clubs Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penrith panthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pokies regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-commitment for pokies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=249475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has there ever been a more self-serving public campaign than the one being mounted by Clubs Australia? It's time for a closer look at the alleged benefits of clubs to the Australian community.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/27/clubs-australia-campaignand-pokies-revenue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cybercrime bill not due yet, but ISPs are still worried</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/21/cybercrime-bill-to-be-debated-in-senat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/21/cybercrime-bill-to-be-debated-in-senat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 02:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybercrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybercrime Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybercrime Legislation Amendment Bill 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=248232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are ISPs so concerned about the cybercrime bill? It appears to create significant new capacity and equipment requirements for them.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/21/cybercrime-bill-to-be-debated-in-senat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DFAT&#8217;s new passport regs a win for trans and inters-x people</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/15/dfats-new-passport-regs-a-win-for-trans-and-inters-x-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/15/dfats-new-passport-regs-a-win-for-trans-and-inters-x-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 03:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intersex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transgender]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=247072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transs-xual and inters-x Australians will now only have to provide a medical certificate from their regular physician in order to change the s-x on their passport, writes <b>Kate Doak</b>, a writer and postgraduate student]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/15/dfats-new-passport-regs-a-win-for-trans-and-inters-x-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WikiLeaks and disclosing classified information</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/05/wikileaks-and-the-real-rules-of-disclosing-classified-information/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/05/wikileaks-and-the-real-rules-of-disclosing-classified-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 02:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=245027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Julian Assange may face prosecution for revealing the identity of an ASIO officer. But governments disclose secret things all the time.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/05/wikileaks-and-the-real-rules-of-disclosing-classified-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mysterious anti-piracy report to be released &#8216;this week&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/16/mysterious-anti-piracy-report-to-be-released-this-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/16/mysterious-anti-piracy-report-to-be-released-this-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 01:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software piracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=210819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An anti-piracy lobby group has bowed to pressure and released a controversial report on the impact of internet piracy on the Australian economy, following howls of protest over its existence and veracity.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/16/mysterious-anti-piracy-report-to-be-released-this-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The multimillion dollar corporate plan to destroy WikiLeaks</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/10/the-multimillion-dollar-corporate-plan-to-destroy-wikileaks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/10/the-multimillion-dollar-corporate-plan-to-destroy-wikileaks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 02:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB Gary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on the Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=202454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anonymous's attack on an American cyber-security company was for the lulz, until it revealed a multimillion dollar plan to attack WikiLeaks.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/10/the-multimillion-dollar-corporate-plan-to-destroy-wikileaks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The political problem of WikiLeaks</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/14/wikileaks-the-governments-problem-is-getting-the-basics-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/14/wikileaks-the-governments-problem-is-getting-the-basics-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 02:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=192817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A backbench revolt over the stance on WikiLeaks and Julian Assange's imprisonment is one thing. Julia Gillard's government has a bigger problem with simple competence.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/14/wikileaks-the-governments-problem-is-getting-the-basics-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bob Brown supports WikiLeaks, is Phillip Adams in the frame?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/06/rundle-bob-brown-supports-wikileaks-is-phillip-adams-in-the-frame/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/06/rundle-bob-brown-supports-wikileaks-is-phillip-adams-in-the-frame/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 02:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy Rundle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Rundle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cablegate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passport control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rundle on Wikileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=190787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should the government decide that it wants to pursue action around the 'Cablegate' material, other Australians involved with WikiLeaks may well be liable for prosecution. The most prominent of these is the broadcaster Phillip Adams who is, or was until recently, a member of the advisory board of WikiLeaks.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/06/rundle-bob-brown-supports-wikileaks-is-phillip-adams-in-the-frame/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McClelland&#8217;s sensitive information debate, circa 1985</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/06/crikey-says-mcclellands-sensitive-information-debate-circa-1985/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/06/crikey-says-mcclellands-sensitive-information-debate-circa-1985/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 02:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cablegate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=190740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If McClelland thinks there is a debate to be had over media handling of national security information, he should throw it open to the media most likely to offer the sort of coverage he appears concerned about.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/06/crikey-says-mcclellands-sensitive-information-debate-circa-1985/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missing the point on WikiLeaks</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/03/like-mp3s-wikileaks-will-change-govt-so-why-has-everyone-missed-the-point/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/03/like-mp3s-wikileaks-will-change-govt-so-why-has-everyone-missed-the-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 02:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=190486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The WikiLeaks cables -- far more significant than anyone has acknowledged -- will change governments. But both the mainstream media and the federal government appear to be completely oblivious to the fact.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/03/like-mp3s-wikileaks-will-change-govt-so-why-has-everyone-missed-the-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>90</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frank Brennan: Why human rights need to be our agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/a-charter-of-rights-is-divisive-the-vast-majority-think-not-20100422-tfqk.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/a-charter-of-rights-is-divisive-the-vast-majority-think-not-20100422-tfqk.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racial discrimination act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=132990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia doesn't need a human rights charter, the government has decided. Fine, says <b>Frank Brennan</b>, that wasn't the main point anyway. Hopefully the government won't ignore the 87% of respondents who want a human rights act.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/a-charter-of-rights-is-divisive-the-vast-majority-think-not-20100422-tfqk.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill of rights: good riddance on &#8216;bogus&#8217; charter v lost chance</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/21/bill-of-rights-good-riddance-on-bogus-charter-v-lost-chance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/21/bill-of-rights-good-riddance-on-bogus-charter-v-lost-chance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey Intern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greg barns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Allan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[julian burnside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=132322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia's charter of rights is dead on arrival. Good riddance, a human rights academic tells <i>Crikey</i> intern Patrick Tombola, but others like Julian Burnside lament the lost opportunity to recognise those on the margins of society.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/21/bill-of-rights-good-riddance-on-bogus-charter-v-lost-chance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McClelland, Macklin get an &#8220;F&#8221; on indigenous housing reforms</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/northern/2010/02/07/mcclelland-macklin-fahcsia-get-an-%E2%80%9Cf%E2%80%9D-on-native-title-indigenous-housing-reforms/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/northern/2010/02/07/mcclelland-macklin-fahcsia-get-an-%E2%80%9Cf%E2%80%9D-on-native-title-indigenous-housing-reforms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAHCSIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indigenous housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=114768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin’s FaHCSIA staff have faced an absolute grilling over a new Bill that was supposed to improve housing in Indigenous communities, but fails to deliver any of the "vital" reforms it was created to address, reports <b>Bob Gosford</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/northern/2010/02/07/mcclelland-macklin-fahcsia-get-an-%E2%80%9Cf%E2%80%9D-on-native-title-indigenous-housing-reforms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Human rights: what is Rudd waiting for?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/20/human-rights-what-is-rudd-waiting-for/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/20/human-rights-what-is-rudd-waiting-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australian christian lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill of rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Carr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george pell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights abuses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=110769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the government backing away from introducing a bill of rights? In the absence of any serious negatives, we should expect a human rights act within this parliamentary term, writes <b>Susan Ryan</b>, chair of the Australian Human Rights Group. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/20/human-rights-what-is-rudd-waiting-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charter of rights is &#8220;stone cold dead&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/no-time-to-be-a-timid-little-nation-20091001-geir.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/no-time-to-be-a-timid-little-nation-20091001-geir.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill of rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights charter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=90507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It now seems the Brennan committee report will <em>not</em> recommend an Australian bill of rights. How did such a good idea get bogged down in the fallacy that judges would abuse their power? asks <b>Richard Ackland</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/no-time-to-be-a-timid-little-nation-20091001-geir.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice in the balance &#8230; bank balance, that is</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/22/courts-justice-in-the-balance-bank-balance-that-is/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/22/courts-justice-in-the-balance-bank-balance-that-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Barns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/22/courts-justice-in-the-balance-bank-balance-that-is/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite decades of lip service from governments and the legal community, the price of justice is still prohibitively expensive for most Australians.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/22/courts-justice-in-the-balance-bank-balance-that-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Security Legislation: worst discussion paper ever.</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/17/national-security-legislation-worst-discussion-paper-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/17/national-security-legislation-worst-discussion-paper-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Federal Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Rundle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security Legislation Discussion Paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/17/national-security-legislation-worst-discussion-paper-ever/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Security Legislation Discussion Paper was released last week. And it may be one of the worst discussion papers ever, with no structure, barebones commentary and lots of blank pages.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/17/national-security-legislation-worst-discussion-paper-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The mystery of brussel sprouts solved</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/14/richard-farmers-political-bite-sized-meaty-chunks-73/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/14/richard-farmers-political-bite-sized-meaty-chunks-73/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Farmer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yale University Press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/14/richard-farmers-political-bite-sized-meaty-chunks-73/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Richard Farmer</b> explores why some people hate brussel sprouts, AG Robert McClelland's proposed security laws and the fight against free speech at Yale University Press.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/14/richard-farmers-political-bite-sized-meaty-chunks-73/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McClelland&#8217;s new terror bill is soft totalitarian nonsense</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/13/rundle-mcclellands-new-terror-bill-is-soft-totalitarian-nonsense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/13/rundle-mcclellands-new-terror-bill-is-soft-totalitarian-nonsense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy Rundle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Rundle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudd government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/13/rundle-mcclellands-new-terror-bill-is-soft-totalitarian-nonsense/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert McClelland's new terror bill is based on the notion that people are simply psychological crash-test dummies, rather than robust and resilient citizens in a free society.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/13/rundle-mcclellands-new-terror-bill-is-soft-totalitarian-nonsense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The terror raid leak was serious. We must find the source</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/06/the-terror-raid-leak-was-serious-we-must-find-the-source/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/06/the-terror-raid-leak-was-serious-we-must-find-the-source/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Faris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Federal Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameron Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mohamed Haneef]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terror raids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Australian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoria Police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/06/the-terror-raid-leak-was-serious-we-must-find-the-source/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to the leaking of the terror raids in Melbourne by <em>The Oz</em, Australian anti-terrorist security is, again, an international embarrassment.</em>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/06/the-terror-raid-leak-was-serious-we-must-find-the-source/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do we need to further strengthen terror laws?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/22/why-do-we-need-to-further-strengthen-terror-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/22/why-do-we-need-to-further-strengthen-terror-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Barns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/22/why-do-we-need-to-further-strengthen-terror-laws/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who has Mr Rudd’s Attorney-General, Robert McClelland been talking to? asks <b>Greg Barns</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/22/why-do-we-need-to-further-strengthen-terror-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Targeting the terrorist teachers</title>
		<link>http://www.theage.com.au/national/rudd-to-toughen-terror-laws-20090721-ds6j.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.theage.com.au/national/rudd-to-toughen-terror-laws-20090721-ds6j.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racial hatred]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudd government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=75136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of its terrorism law review, the Rudd government wants to include the offence of inciting violence on the basis of race, religion or nationality, focusing in particular on those who encourage others.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theage.com.au/national/rudd-to-toughen-terror-laws-20090721-ds6j.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New dirty words: war on terror</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/07/new-dirty-words-war-on-terror/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/07/new-dirty-words-war-on-terror/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey Intern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Multicultural Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war on terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weasel words]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/07/new-dirty-words-war-on-terror/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nearly eight years on from the 9/11 attacks, the Federal Government is launching a review of the official language used to discuss terrorism, and terms like 'jihadist' are within their sights.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/07/new-dirty-words-war-on-terror/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1683/1947 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 01:02:27 -->
