<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; remuneration report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/remuneration-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Allan Moss: Successful but overpaid</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/07/allan-moss-successful-but-overpaid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/07/allan-moss-successful-but-overpaid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high interest rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investor optimism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Investors may be justified in asking, why does Macquarie pay its executives more than any other company, when 67 others performed better, writes <b>Adam Schwab</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/07/allan-moss-successful-but-overpaid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Full marks to Macquarie for new bonus structure</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/07/full-marks-to-macquarie-for-new-bonus-structure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/07/full-marks-to-macquarie-for-new-bonus-structure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonus structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk metrics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Macquarie Bankers are famously tough. They will sue, threaten, cajole, argue and buy there way to victory no matter what it takes. However, in corporate governance terms, the millionaires factory blinked in a major way yesterday when a new bonus structure was unveiled, writes <b>Stephen Mayne</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/07/full-marks-to-macquarie-for-new-bonus-structure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telstra cops whack from shareholders over remuneration report</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/08/telstra-cops-whack-from-shareholders-over-remuneration-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/08/telstra-cops-whack-from-shareholders-over-remuneration-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive remuneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaxosmithkline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Telstra’s board has been given an almighty whack by shareholders, with more than 66 percent of them casting a non-binding vote against the company’s poorly disclosed remuneration report, writes Adam Schwab.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/08/telstra-cops-whack-from-shareholders-over-remuneration-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Babcock teaches MacBank how to gouge</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/08/babcock-teaches-macbank-how-to-gouge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/08/babcock-teaches-macbank-how-to-gouge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Babcock and Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bnb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How fortunate for Babcock and Brown Infrastructure that Telstra also had its AGM yesterday – the kerfuffle over Sol’s wage nicely overshadowed a BBI remuneration report that made Telstra’s look parsimonious, writes Michael Pascoe.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/08/babcock-teaches-macbank-how-to-gouge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suncorp slapped down by shareholders</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/01/suncorp-slapped-down-by-shareholders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/01/suncorp-slapped-down-by-shareholders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retention incentive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suncorp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[told shareholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The board of Suncorp received a slap in the face from shareholders, with a record 41% of proxies being cast against the banks remuneration report at yesterday’s Annual General Meeting, writes Adam Schwab.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/01/suncorp-slapped-down-by-shareholders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Macquarie v ISS: who should and shouldn&#8217;t vote?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/18/macquarie-v-iss-who-should-and-shouldnt-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/18/macquarie-v-iss-who-should-and-shouldnt-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutional shareholder services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macquarie Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remuneration report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zinifex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Macquarie Bank has been aggressively fighting a rearguard action against proxy advisory powerhouse Institutional Shareholder Services on the contentious question of voting on the Millionaire Factory’s remuneration report at tomorrow’s AGM.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/18/macquarie-v-iss-who-should-and-shouldnt-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 683/745 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 01:31:14 -->
