<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; readership figures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/readership-figures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>News Ltd&#8217;s Xmas gift: new newspaper reader data!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.theaustralian.news.com.au/markday/index.php/theaustralian/comments/readership_wars_far_from_over_by_christmas/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.theaustralian.news.com.au/markday/index.php/theaustralian/comments/readership_wars_far_from_over_by_christmas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper readership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readership figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roy morgan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=105403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Mark Day</b> explains the long and bitter tale of why Australian newspapers are getting a second set of readership information. It all started with Sir Keith and Roy Morgan after WWII...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.theaustralian.news.com.au/markday/index.php/theaustralian/comments/readership_wars_far_from_over_by_christmas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which magazines are Australians reading?</title>
		<link>http://girlwithasatchel.blogspot.com/2009/11/mags-what-are-aussies-reading.html</link>
		<comments>http://girlwithasatchel.blogspot.com/2009/11/mags-what-are-aussies-reading.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine readership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readership figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roy morgan research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=98922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Girl With a Satchel</em> combs through Roy Morgan's latest <a href="http://www.roymorgan.com/news/press-releases/2009/964/">readership figures</a> to see which glossies Australians are -- and aren't -- reading. <em>Better Homes and Gardens</em> continues to boom, while <em>Cleo</em> has taken a caning.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://girlwithasatchel.blogspot.com/2009/11/mags-what-are-aussies-reading.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Readership vs. circulation: the numbers that matter</title>
		<link>http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/business/story/0,28124,26067740-5016935,00.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/business/story/0,28124,26067740-5016935,00.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audit Bureau of Circulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circulation figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readership figures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=86230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's the perennial question for publishers and advertisers; which is more important: circulation -- the number of copies of your publication being sent out into the wilderness -- or readership -- the number of people actually reading it? Audit Bureau chief <b>Gordon Towell</b> weighs in.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/business/story/0,28124,26067740-5016935,00.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Roy Morgan is like Seinfeld&#8216;s Soup Nazi</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/nick-chan-roy-morgan-is-like-seinfelds-soup-nazi-but-changing-the-trading-currency-borders-on-the-ludicrous-7044</link>
		<comments>http://mumbrella.com.au/nick-chan-roy-morgan-is-like-seinfelds-soup-nazi-but-changing-the-trading-currency-borders-on-the-ludicrous-7044#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Chan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pacific magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readership figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roy morgan research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seinfeld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=69589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roy Morgan Research is like the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2lfZg-apSA">Soup Nazi</a>, says Pacific Magazines' Nick Chan: "the service is crap but the soup is the best." ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mumbrella.com.au/nick-chan-roy-morgan-is-like-seinfelds-soup-nazi-but-changing-the-trading-currency-borders-on-the-ludicrous-7044/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newspapers fret as readership figures get a makeover</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/28/newspapers-fret-as-readership-figures-get-a-makeover/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/28/newspapers-fret-as-readership-figures-get-a-makeover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readership figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roy morgan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newspaper readership figures seem to be an oddly unreliable measure, writes <b>Margaret Simons</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/28/newspapers-fret-as-readership-figures-get-a-makeover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Readership v. circulation: curious newspaper mathematics</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/14/readership-v-circulation-curious-newspaper-mathematics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/14/readership-v-circulation-curious-newspaper-mathematics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circulation figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readership figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roy morgan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can we ever know how many copies of newspapers really find their way to readers? <b>Margaret Simons</b> crunches the numbers.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/14/readership-v-circulation-curious-newspaper-mathematics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deciphering newspaper readership and circulation figures</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/11/deciphering-newspaper-readership-and-circulation-figures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/11/deciphering-newspaper-readership-and-circulation-figures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audit Bureau of Circulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circulation figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circulation increases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readership figures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some weeks ago I asked Steve Allen of Fusion Strategies to do some number crunching comparing circulation and readership figures of our major daily newspapers. The intention was to test how "real" circulation increases (and decreases) are, given the number of discount deals presently available, writes Margaret Simons. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/11/deciphering-newspaper-readership-and-circulation-figures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 744/820 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 04:29:21 -->
