<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; privacy laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/privacy-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>LinkedIn pulls a Facebook-like swifty on &#8216;social advertising&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/11/linkedin-a-facebook-social-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/11/linkedin-a-facebook-social-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 03:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=240513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LinkedIn likes to portray itself as the professional social network, but it seems they're perfectly happy to treat their professional users as fodder for advertisers without asking.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/11/linkedin-a-facebook-social-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the campaign against anonymity is an attack on free speech</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/09/why-the-campaign-against-anonymity-is-an-attack-on-free-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/09/why-the-campaign-against-anonymity-is-an-attack-on-free-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 03:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on the Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=239962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's a growing campaign against online anonymity from governments, corporations and even the media. It's dangerous.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/09/why-the-campaign-against-anonymity-is-an-attack-on-free-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Privacy Eye: the challenge for the media</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/29/privacy-eye-the-challenge-for-the-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/29/privacy-eye-the-challenge-for-the-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 02:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news of the world phone hacking scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy eye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=238431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Media bosses assure us blatant disregard for the law is not part of the local scene but a broad-based inquiry into the media is in the offing, writes <b>Peter Timmins</b>, a lawyer and blogger. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/29/privacy-eye-the-challenge-for-the-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Privacy Eye: only the rich and powerful to benefit?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/26/privacy-eye-only-the-rich-and-powerful-to-benefit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/26/privacy-eye-only-the-rich-and-powerful-to-benefit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 03:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naomi Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news of the world phone hacking scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy eye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statutory right to privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=237697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The complex debate on whether we need legal recognition of privacy rights has been artificially narrowed by <i>News of the World</i> frenzy, writes <b>Luke Williams</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/26/privacy-eye-only-the-rich-and-powerful-to-benefit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Privacy Eye: balancing free speech against wrongful invasion</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/25/privacy-eye-balancing-free-speech-against-wrongful-invasion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/25/privacy-eye-balancing-free-speech-against-wrongful-invasion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 03:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jane doe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naomi Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news of the world phone hacking scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy eye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=237151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sooner or later there will be a tort of privacy in Australia and the media might as well get used to the idea, writes <b>Dr Denis Muller</b>, who teaches media ethics at Swinburne University.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/25/privacy-eye-balancing-free-speech-against-wrongful-invasion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Privacy Eye: media shouldn&#8217;t fear debate on privacy laws</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/22/privacy-eye-media-shouldnt-fear-debate-on-privacy-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/22/privacy-eye-media-shouldnt-fear-debate-on-privacy-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 03:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists' code of ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news of the world phone hacking scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy eye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=237140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal government’s decision to initiate a debate on privacy laws has provoked some typically premature condemnation from some sections of the media, writes <b>Michael Smith</b>, former editor of <i>The Age</i>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/22/privacy-eye-media-shouldnt-fear-debate-on-privacy-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crikey says: Privacy Eye</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/22/crikey-says-privacy-eye/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/22/crikey-says-privacy-eye/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 03:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy eye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=237100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["A statutory right to privacy is one very small shield against a vast effort to find out everything about you."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/22/crikey-says-privacy-eye/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What happens when you extend the idea of public interest to privacy?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/21/what-happens-when-you-extend-the-idea-of-public-interest-to-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/21/what-happens-when-you-extend-the-idea-of-public-interest-to-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 03:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Dodd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commonwealth privacy act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael gawenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News of the world hacking scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news of the world phone hacking scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=236962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's an inevitability about the renewed debate over privacy laws. The Australian media is ready for the fight, with complex questions over how any framework would operate.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/21/what-happens-when-you-extend-the-idea-of-public-interest-to-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What are the legalities of the St Kilda photo scandal?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/23/crikey-clarifier-what-are-the-legalities-of-the-st-kilda-photo-scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/23/crikey-clarifier-what-are-the-legalities-of-the-st-kilda-photo-scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey Intern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St Kilda football club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[st kilda sex scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=194817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s the media’s ultimate Christmas gift -- naked photos, embarrassed footballers and a net-savvy teenage girl. But since the St Kilda photo scandal has legal implications of the images’ release mounting by the day, <em>Crikey</em> decided to hit the books to find out the facts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/23/crikey-clarifier-what-are-the-legalities-of-the-st-kilda-photo-scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online privacy dangers: they’re not what you think</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/15/online-privacy-dangers-they%e2%80%99re-not-what-you-think/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/15/online-privacy-dangers-they%e2%80%99re-not-what-you-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 02:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=186023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget your drunken photos on Facebook. They already know about them, and you know they know. Don’t worry about tracking cookies either. It’s what you don’t know they know that you should worry about.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/15/online-privacy-dangers-they%e2%80%99re-not-what-you-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rundle: News of the World hacking &#8212; this will run and run</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/16/rundle-news-of-the-world-hacking-this-will-run-and-run/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/16/rundle-news-of-the-world-hacking-this-will-run-and-run/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 03:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy Rundle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone-hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=172247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A dozen figures are now undertaking legal action against News Ltd, including John Prescott, comedian Steve Coogan and actress Siena Miller, and the number has been growing daily.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/16/rundle-news-of-the-world-hacking-this-will-run-and-run/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep the kids out of it</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/17/crikey-says-keep-the-kids-out-of-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/17/crikey-says-keep-the-kids-out-of-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 03:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herald Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tim mathieson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woman's Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=165003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's one thing for a gossip rag to roll around in this stuff about Tim Mathieson's daughter. It's another thing for the nation's highest selling newspaper to concoct a story around it.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/17/crikey-says-keep-the-kids-out-of-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keating slams media hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/05/keating-slams-news-over-right-to-know-hypocrisy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/05/keating-slams-news-over-right-to-know-hypocrisy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 03:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael gawenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Keating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phil gardner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to Know]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=161904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[University PR flaks buzzed anxiously as Crikey arrived at the University of Melbourne's Carrillo Gantner Theatre last night to witness Paul Keating wade into the election campaign via a well-researched speech on the media's notorious allergy to privacy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/05/keating-slams-news-over-right-to-know-hypocrisy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SPEECH: Paul Keating on privacy in the information age</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/04/speech-paul-keating-on-privacy-in-the-information-age/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/04/speech-paul-keating-on-privacy-in-the-information-age/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commonwealth privacy act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=161627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former prime minister Paul Keating is delivering a speech to the Centre for Advance Journalism, University of Melbourne, tonight on the 'privacy imperative in the information age'. <em>Crikey</em> has the speech.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/04/speech-paul-keating-on-privacy-in-the-information-age/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A legal look at the Lara Bingle case</title>
		<link>http://fortnightlyreview.info/2010/03/12/%E2%80%9Cwhere-the-bloody-hell-are-you%E2%80%9D-lara-bingle-in-search-of-a-cause-of-action/</link>
		<comments>http://fortnightlyreview.info/2010/03/12/%E2%80%9Cwhere-the-bloody-hell-are-you%E2%80%9D-lara-bingle-in-search-of-a-cause-of-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brendan Fevola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lara bingle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=123260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lara Bingle (and Max Markson, naturally) is taking Brendan Fevola to court for breach of privacy, defamation and misuse of her image. But does she really have a case? Legal experts <b>Jason Bosland</b> and <b>Vicki Huang</b> take the stand.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://fortnightlyreview.info/2010/03/12/%E2%80%9Cwhere-the-bloody-hell-are-you%E2%80%9D-lara-bingle-in-search-of-a-cause-of-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keating on the stairs: beating or beat up?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/02/keating-on-the-stairs-beating-or-beat-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/02/keating-on-the-stairs-beating-or-beat-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[absolut vodka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katherine Keating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Keating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday Telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/02/keating-on-the-stairs-beating-or-beat-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Insiders say a <em>Sunday Telegraph</em> <a href="http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/sunday-telegraph/katherine-keatings-threat-to-kill-photographer/story-e6frewt0-1225793126733">alleging</a> Paul Keating's daughter kicked and threatened to kill one of its photographers was at best a beat-up, and at-worst a total fabrication.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/02/keating-on-the-stairs-beating-or-beat-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PODCAST: Michael Kirby: Why privacy matters</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/09/podcast-michael-kirby-why-privacy-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/09/podcast-michael-kirby-why-privacy-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Kirby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=85145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["In the age of the internet, stories that once would have been wrapping the fish and chips and forgotten a few weeks or months or years later
are preserved forever," says former High Court justice <b>Michael Kirby</b> in this speech for Privacy Victoria.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/09/podcast-michael-kirby-why-privacy-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Della Bosca&#8217;s sex life really a public interest story?</title>
		<link>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/cause-to-regret-the-whole-affair-20090903-f9ub.html?page=-1</link>
		<comments>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/cause-to-regret-the-whole-affair-20090903-f9ub.html?page=-1#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belinda Neal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Della Bosca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians behaving badly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=84141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With <em>The Daily Tele's</em> eagerness to break the John Della Bosca sex scandal and destroy his political career, what will this mean for future issues involving politicians, privacy and matters of public interest?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/cause-to-regret-the-whole-affair-20090903-f9ub.html?page=-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Privacy case costs News of the World almost £1m</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/may/05/max-mosley-colin-myler</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/may/05/max-mosley-colin-myler#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 02:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Formula One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Mosley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=55838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defending a story they ran about F1 boss Max Mosley's sex life has cost the <i>News of the World</i> almost £1m.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/may/05/max-mosley-colin-myler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surveillance: an unregulated part of our everyday lives?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/31/surveillance-an-unregulated-part-of-our-everyday-lives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/31/surveillance-an-unregulated-part-of-our-everyday-lives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia's Right to Know]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Law Reform Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victorian Law Reform Commission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/Politics/20090331-Surveillance-part-of-our-everyday-lives.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are concerns that because the line between genuine news and entertainment has become blurred, surveillance isn't always carried out in the public interest, writes <b>Neil Rees</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/31/surveillance-an-unregulated-part-of-our-everyday-lives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hanson: Media Watch &#8216;dangerous&#8217;, Press Council waits</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/17/hanson-media-watch-dangerous-press-council-waits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/17/hanson-media-watch-dangerous-press-council-waits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediawatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pauline Hanson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night’s Media Watch program suggested John Hartigan's campaign against proposed privacy legislation had been undermined by the publication of the nude "Pauline Hanson" photos, writes <b>Margaret Simons</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/17/hanson-media-watch-dangerous-press-council-waits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Privacy is not in the interests of the Labor Party</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/18/privacy-is-not-in-the-interests-of-the-labor-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/18/privacy-is-not-in-the-interests-of-the-labor-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australian electorial commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor government of australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Putting aside the systemic breach of privacy that a database like Electrac entails, it relies on the goodwill and maturity of MPs and their staff to ensure that such a database isn’t abused, writes <b>Bernard Keane</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/18/privacy-is-not-in-the-interests-of-the-labor-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right to privacy sends media into a spin</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/08/11/right-to-privacy-sends-media-into-a-spin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/08/11/right-to-privacy-sends-media-into-a-spin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics governmentalrc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Australian Law Reform Commission has thrown down the gauntlet to two of Australia’s most powerful entities in its report on privacy, launched by John Faulkner and Robert McClelland in Sydney this morning, writes <b>Bernard Keane</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/08/11/right-to-privacy-sends-media-into-a-spin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1526/1759 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 03:46:58 -->
