<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; pentagon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/pentagon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pentagon freaking over WikiLeaks&#8217; Iraq document dump</title>
		<link>http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/pentagon-braced-for-iraq-revelations-from-wikileaks-2109445.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/pentagon-braced-for-iraq-revelations-from-wikileaks-2109445.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 23:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revealed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks Iraq War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=178842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a whopping 500,000 classified documents on the Iraq War expected to leak on the WikiLeaks site this month, the Pentagon have put together a 120-person team to prepare for the expected scandal. The documents are expected to contain details on civilian causalities in Iraq.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/pentagon-braced-for-iraq-revelations-from-wikileaks-2109445.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shaffer plays Afghan Whispers with Pentagon … and wins</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/15/shaffer-plays-afghan-whispers-with-pentagon-%e2%80%a6-and-wins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/15/shaffer-plays-afghan-whispers-with-pentagon-%e2%80%a6-and-wins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 03:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey Intern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=171849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spies, scandals, secret documents, crises in the Pentagon ... and that’s before anyone’s even opened the bloody book! Controversy around Afghan War exposé <em>Operation Dark Heart</em> will likely drive big sales, writes <em>Crikey</em> intern <b>Nick Johns-Wickberg</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/15/shaffer-plays-afghan-whispers-with-pentagon-%e2%80%a6-and-wins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The book the Pentagon doesn&#8217;t want you to read</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/sep/13/pentagon-afghanistan-spy-book-pulp</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/sep/13/pentagon-afghanistan-spy-book-pulp#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation Dark Heart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revealed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war in Afghanistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=171498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A former US spy's memoir revealing the poor handling of the Afghanistan War and how the US military stuffed it up, called <em>Operation Dark Heart</em>, is so damaging to the Pentagon that it is buying all 10,000 copies in order to pulp them. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/sep/13/pentagon-afghanistan-spy-book-pulp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pentagon can&#8217;t plug WikiLeaks</title>
		<link>http://www.newser.com/article/d9hf80ug0/ap-interview-wikileaks-to-publish-new-secret-files-from-governments-around-the-world.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.newser.com/article/d9hf80ug0/ap-interview-wikileaks-to-publish-new-secret-files-from-governments-around-the-world.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks Afghan War Diary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=162693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too bad that the Pentagon is demanding that no more confidential US military documents appear on the internet, WikiLeaks has confirmed it will continue to leak damaging documents from around the world.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newser.com/article/d9hf80ug0/ap-interview-wikileaks-to-publish-new-secret-files-from-governments-around-the-world.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t bake the 26-page Pentagon brownie recipe</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/06/04/daily-proposition-dont-bake-the-26-page-pentagon-brownie-recipe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/06/04/daily-proposition-dont-bake-the-26-page-pentagon-brownie-recipe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 03:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Proposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food & Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brownies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recipe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=143728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<i>Crikey</i> was particularly taken with a leaked 26-page Pentagon recipe for baking soldiers' brownies, so we asked <b>Nicole Eckersley</b> to make them and write it up. One sex shop visit later, this is her story.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/06/04/daily-proposition-dont-bake-the-26-page-pentagon-brownie-recipe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pentagon&#8217;s 26-page brownie recipe</title>
		<link>http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127058298&#038;ft=1&#038;f=1053</link>
		<comments>http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127058298&#038;ft=1&#038;f=1053#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 23:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food & Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brownies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recipes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=141282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Document MIL-C-44072C, a highly important Pentagon manual has been leaked online. It's contents? Twenty-six pages on how to make military standard cookies and brownies. They <em>must not</em> exceed 3.5"x2.5"x5/8". Download the entire recipe <a href="http://liw.iki.fi/liw/misc/MIL-C-44072C.pdf">here</a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127058298&#038;ft=1&#038;f=1053/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US military running private spy ring in AfPak</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/16/world/16contractors.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/16/world/16contractors.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 01:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AfPak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revealed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Armed Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war in Afghanistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=138960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <em>NYT</em> reveals the US is still is running a potentially illegal "rogue operation" of private spies in Afghanistan and Pakistan, employing former CIA agents and Special-Ops soldiers to gather information.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/16/world/16contractors.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pentagon bans journalists from Gitmo trial</title>
		<link>http://www.harpers.org/archive/2010/05/hbc-90007004</link>
		<comments>http://www.harpers.org/archive/2010/05/hbc-90007004#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 22:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Omar Khadr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Omar Khadr trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=136785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pentagon has banned four US reporters from the Omar Khadr trial at Guantanamo Bay after they reported the name of a witness whose identity is under protective order. It's another embarrassment in a disastrous trial, says <b>Scott Horton</b>. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harpers.org/archive/2010/05/hbc-90007004/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finally: the Pentagon is developing a flying car</title>
		<link>http://news.discovery.com/tech/flying-car-pentagon-jetsons.html</link>
		<comments>http://news.discovery.com/tech/flying-car-pentagon-jetsons.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 01:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flying cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=134591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US military is finally putting its time and money into something worthwhile: creating a flying car. The project, codenamed "Transformer", is attempting to create a prototype SUV-helicopter hybrid within four years. Now, about those jetpacks...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.discovery.com/tech/flying-car-pentagon-jetsons.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s scary new toy</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/23/world/europe/23strike.html?hp</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/23/world/europe/23strike.html?hp#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prompt Global Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Armed Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=133249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US has designed a new weapon called Prompt Global Strike, capable of striking anywhere on earth in under an hour with pinpoint accuracy and the power of a nuclear warhead. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/23/world/europe/23strike.html?hp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pentagon&#8217;s war on WikiLeaks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/03/27/wikileaks</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/03/27/wikileaks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=127069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://wikileaks.org/">WikiLeaks</a> has long been pissing off governments by obtaining and publishing their secret and sensitive documents online. And as <a href="http://file.wikileaks.org/file/us-intel-wikileaks.pdf">this secret Pentagon report</a> [PDF] reveals, it hasn't gone un-noticed. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/03/27/wikileaks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pentagon&#8217;s $56b &#8220;Black Budget&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/pentagons-black-budget-tops-56-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/pentagons-black-budget-tops-56-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Armed Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US defence department]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=113727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don your tin-foil hats: the US Defence Dept has released its new $708 billion budget -- with $56 billion earmarked simply for "classified programs", the organisation's largest "black budget" ever. So where is it all going?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/02/pentagons-black-budget-tops-56-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackwater is still working for the US</title>
		<link>http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/blackwater-names/story?id=9634372&#038;page=1</link>
		<comments>http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/blackwater-names/story?id=9634372&#038;page=1#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blackwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Armed Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war in Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war in iraq]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=113449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pentagon and CIA are still employing controversial military contractor <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/blackwater/">Blackwater</a> in Afghanistan (albeit under a new name), despite allegations of involvement in murder, gun-running, child prostitution and more, <em>ABC News</em> reveals.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/blackwater-names/story?id=9634372&#038;page=1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pentagon: Climate change threat to national security</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/01/pentagon-climate-change-threat-to-national-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/01/pentagon-climate-change-threat-to-national-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cass</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quadrennial Defense Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=113212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pentagon is set to tell Congress that climate change is a real and present threat to national security. It is a sign of these strange times when the US military's stance on climate change is closer to Bob Brown's than that of any major Australian party.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/01/pentagon-climate-change-threat-to-national-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real cost of Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-troop-costs23-2009nov23,0,3233273.story</link>
		<comments>http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-troop-costs23-2009nov23,0,3233273.story#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Armed Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war in Afghanistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=100417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Documents leaked to the <em>LA Times</em> show the Pentagon calculate the 40,000-troop surge in Afghanistan being pushed for by military commanders would cost $30-35 billion -- at least $750,000 a person.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-troop-costs23-2009nov23,0,3233273.story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pentagon&#8217;s secret Afghan war games</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/25/AR2009102502633.html?hpid=topnews</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/25/AR2009102502633.html?hpid=topnews#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Armed Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war in Afghanistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=95303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US military has been testing new strategies for combat in Afghanistan in secret war games, an inside source reveals, including the possibility of adding 44,000 more troops for a full-scale counterinsurgency, or 15,000 more to target Taliban commanders. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/25/AR2009102502633.html?hpid=topnews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Pentagon funding the Taliban?</title>
		<link>http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/afghanistan/091002/us-military-funding-both-sides-afghan-war</link>
		<comments>http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/afghanistan/091002/us-military-funding-both-sides-afghan-war#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 01:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Armed Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war in Afghanistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=91743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A US military aid program in Afghanistan that ensures local businesses score all contracts on projects and procurement is filtering money directly into the Taliban's hands, says <b>Jean MacKenzie</b>. The Pentagon knows, but its hands are tied.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/afghanistan/091002/us-military-funding-both-sides-afghan-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Obama shot down Star Wars</title>
		<link>http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/09/missile_defense.php</link>
		<comments>http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/09/missile_defense.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Czech Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Wars shield]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=87498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama's decision to junk Bush-era plans for a missile defence shield in Europe <em>isn't</em> a capitulation to Russia, says <b>Mark Ambinder</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/09/missile_defense.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stars and Stripes: keeping an eagle eye on the Pentagon</title>
		<link>http://www.forbes.com/2009/09/05/stars-and-stripes-howard-witt-business-media-stripes.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.forbes.com/2009/09/05/stars-and-stripes-howard-witt-business-media-stripes.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Witt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stars and Stripes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Armed Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=85213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US military newspaper <em>Stars and Stripes</em> may be partially funded by the Pentagon, but its not afraid to hold the government and military <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/28/at-stars-and-stripes-independent-investigative-journalism-soldiers-on/">to account</a>. Editor Howard Witt talks independent investigative journalism, and why he gave Ann Coulter and Ariana Huffington the boot.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forbes.com/2009/09/05/stars-and-stripes-howard-witt-business-media-stripes.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are Russian subs patrolling the US coast?</title>
		<link>http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0806/p02s10-usmi.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0806/p02s10-usmi.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[submarine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=78368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two nuclear-powered Russian attack submarines are operating off the US East Coast and the Pentagon don't know why. Is Russia <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/05/world/05patrol.html">flexing its muscles again</a>? Or just <a href="http://gawker.com/5330186/why-are-russian-nuclear-submarines-patrolling-the-us-coast">trying to give Tom Clancy something to write about</a>?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0806/p02s10-usmi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boom times for guns, irony</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/18/crikey-says-23/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/18/crikey-says-23/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arms sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/18/crikey-says-23/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US government-to-government arms sales are growing fast and will likely exceed $40 billion for 2009. It's all part of their strategy for international diplomacy, you see...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/18/crikey-says-23/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US backs good, rich Shi&#8217;ites against the bad, poor ones</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/28/us-backs-good-rich-shiites-against-the-bad-poor-ones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/28/us-backs-good-rich-shiites-against-the-bad-poor-ones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are the Americans fighting for Iranian-backed theocrats in Basra, even as they complain about Iranian interference? <b>Jeff Sparrow</b> investigates.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/28/us-backs-good-rich-shiites-against-the-bad-poor-ones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1497/1703 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 00:32:43 -->
