<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; op-eds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/op-eds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:18:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why Rudd&#8217;s CPRS should be voted down</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/10/essay-why-rudds-cprs-should-be-voted-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/10/essay-why-rudds-cprs-should-be-voted-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon leakage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[op-eds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudd government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/10/essay-why-rudds-cprs-should-be-voted-down/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Passage of the CPRS bill will protect and entrench the very carbon pollution the scheme purports to address. The only sensible vote from any perspective is "No", writes <b>Bernard Keane</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/10/essay-why-rudds-cprs-should-be-voted-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wolff and Kohler: Rupert will make you pay</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/07/wolff-and-kohler-rupert-will-make-you-pay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/07/wolff-and-kohler-rupert-will-make-you-pay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[op-eds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/07/wolff-and-kohler-rupert-will-make-you-pay/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Newser</em>'s <b>Michael Wolff</b> and <em>Business Spectator</em>'s <b>Alan Kohler</b> examine the merits of Rupert Murdoch's pay plan.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/07/wolff-and-kohler-rupert-will-make-you-pay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
