<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; online news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/online-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Kid on the Block: The Wall &#8230; or the walled wide web</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/12/new-kid-on-the-block-the-wall-or-the-walled-wide-web/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/12/new-kid-on-the-block-the-wall-or-the-walled-wide-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 02:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mainstream media coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Kid on the Block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=264580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One Australian new media start-up is using sophisticated software to trawl tweets, and from that constructs a media outlet more or less automatically, featuring the things we are all talking about. Meet <em>The Wall</em>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/12/new-kid-on-the-block-the-wall-or-the-walled-wide-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The campaign to rid anonymous comments from the internet</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/14/the-campaign-to-rid-anonymous-comments-from-the-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/14/the-campaign-to-rid-anonymous-comments-from-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Ad Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comment moderation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Communications Council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=259050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Communications Council, which represents the advertising industry, would like the trade press to ban all anonymous comments. <em>Mumbrella</em>'s <b>Tim Burrowes</b> goes inside the debate.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/14/the-campaign-to-rid-anonymous-comments-from-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why does James Murdoch hate public libraries?</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/may/21/jamesmurdoch-british-library</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/may/21/jamesmurdoch-british-library#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 02:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libraries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=140711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James "Son of Rupert" Murdoch has <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/may/21/james-murdoch-attacks-british-library">hit out</a> at the British Library and its evil information sharing ways. <b>Roy Greenslade</b> has a memo for him: libraries don't care about your bottom line.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/may/21/jamesmurdoch-british-library/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How HuffPo took over the world</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinsider.com/huffington-post-comes-of-age-2010-5</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessinsider.com/huffington-post-comes-of-age-2010-5#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 00:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of the internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=139594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In just five years, <em>The Huffington Post</em> has become the largest independent news site in the world, and its traffic now eclipses that of the <em>WashPo</em>, <em>WSJ</em> and <em>LA Times</em>. Now there's just one more title to top: the <em>NYT</em>. <b>Henry Blodget</b> gives it six months.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessinsider.com/huffington-post-comes-of-age-2010-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The death of the headline</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/17/business/media/17carr.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/17/business/media/17carr.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 00:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimisation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=139270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget witty puns and waggish turns of phrase -- online news headlines are now written with only one thing in mind: search engine optimisation. <b>David Carr</b> mourns the death of the smart screamer.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/17/business/media/17carr.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What are words worth on the web?</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/16/magazine/16Journalism-t.html?pagewanted=1</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/16/magazine/16Journalism-t.html?pagewanted=1#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 23:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=138508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look at the complex economics of online media: "Opinions posted on blogs are cheap. Great journalism is expensive." So should online media editors prize hits over high-quality content? And what are words on the internet actually worth?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/16/magazine/16Journalism-t.html?pagewanted=1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Birthday, HuffPo!</title>
		<link>http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_huffington_post_turns_five.php?page=all</link>
		<comments>http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_huffington_post_turns_five.php?page=all#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 01:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anniversary journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=137293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/">The Huffington Post</a></em>, and <em>CJR</em> hip-hip-hoorays with a series of reflections on the online news empire. Our favourite <a href="http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/why_my_brother_likes_the_huffi.php">comes</a> from <b>Greg Marx</b>: "Why is it always shouting at me?"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/the_huffington_post_turns_five.php?page=all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can you create a magazine in 48 hours?</title>
		<link>http://48hrmag.com/</link>
		<comments>http://48hrmag.com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 00:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=136468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That's the question the folks behind <em>48 Hour</em> magazine are trying to answer. After they unveil the each issue's theme, writers have 24 hours to produce and submit content, then the production team have 24 hours to stick it all together.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://48hrmag.com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Find out how healthy your news diet really is</title>
		<link>http://www.slate.com/id/2252247/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slate.com/id/2252247/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 02:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=134681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you <em>really</em> read from a wide range of news sources? <em>Slate</em> has created a wonderful little widget that looks at your recent news-browsing history and lays your true media biases bare.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/id/2252247/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN: WTF?</title>
		<link>http://wtfcnn.com/</link>
		<comments>http://wtfcnn.com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=134239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>WTF CNN?</em> is a delightfully simple site highlighting the tabloid headlines topping <em>CNN</em>'s homepage by comparing it to the far more news-focused <em>Al-Jazeera</em> front-page. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wtfcnn.com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gawker media explains how to make money online</title>
		<link>http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2010/04/gawkers_march_e.php</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2010/04/gawkers_march_e.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=129353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Village Voice</em> has the latest staff memo from Gawker Media chief Nick Denton, advising his underlings on how to write for the web. It's fascinating reading from someone who actually has this whole internet thing figured out.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2010/04/gawkers_march_e.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s Murdoch got to lose?</title>
		<link>http://www.followthemedia.com/fittoprint/paywall31032010.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.followthemedia.com/fittoprint/paywall31032010.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times (UK)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=127878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch's <em>Times</em> newspaper is hemorrhaging about £1.5 million a week -- so while erecting an online paywall may seem risky, he has nothing to lose and everything to gain, says media consultant <b>Philip M. Stone</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.followthemedia.com/fittoprint/paywall31032010.htm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bartholomeusz: Murdoch isn&#8217;t building a wall &#8212; he&#8217;s building a fortress</title>
		<link>http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/Rupert-Murdoch-News-Corp-The-Times-pay-walls-onlin-pd20100329-3Z8DV?OpenDocument</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/Rupert-Murdoch-News-Corp-The-Times-pay-walls-onlin-pd20100329-3Z8DV?OpenDocument#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times (UK)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=127022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News Corp has decided has decided on a very thick and crude pay-wall model for its UK paper <em>The Times</em>, says <b>Stephen Bartholomeusz</b>: no bundling, no micro-payments, no tiered access. It's all or nothing with Rupe.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/Rupert-Murdoch-News-Corp-The-Times-pay-walls-onlin-pd20100329-3Z8DV?OpenDocument/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The full list of approved iPad apps</title>
		<link>http://appadvice.com/appnn/2010/03/definitive-list-ipad-apps/</link>
		<comments>http://appadvice.com/appnn/2010/03/definitive-list-ipad-apps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 23:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters Pro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=126706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>App Advice</em> has compiled a list of all the apps that will be available when the iPad App Store launches next weekend. So far, the only news app is Reuters Pro, which they have a sneak peak of <a href="http://appadvice.com/appnn/2010/03/ny-times-ipad-news-app-reuters-joins-fold/">here</a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://appadvice.com/appnn/2010/03/definitive-list-ipad-apps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google: How can newspapers survive? Ditch the &#8220;papers&#8221; bit</title>
		<link>http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2010/03/newspaper-economics-online-and-offline.html</link>
		<comments>http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2010/03/newspaper-economics-online-and-offline.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=122075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google's Chief Economist <b>Hal Varian</b> offers some advice to newspaper publishers: paywalls won't cure your financial woes -- going big online will. Forget costly printed news: news outlets must go 100% online to survive.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2010/03/newspaper-economics-online-and-offline.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The science behind the NYT &#8220;most emailed&#8221; list</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/09/science/09tier.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/09/science/09tier.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=115498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[University researchers have been studying the "most emailed" <em>New York Times</em> articles to see what kind of news people like to share -- and why. The results are not what you might expect.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/09/science/09tier.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paywall FAIL: Newsday has 35 subscribers</title>
		<link>http://www.observer.com/2010/media/after-three-months-only-35-subscriptions-newsdays-web-site</link>
		<comments>http://www.observer.com/2010/media/after-three-months-only-35-subscriptions-newsdays-web-site#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=112365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In ominous news for the <em>NYT</em> and News Corp, it has been revealed that <em>newsday.com</em> has only secured 35 subscribers since the paper put up a paywall. The account of how the figure came out is gold.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.observer.com/2010/media/after-three-months-only-35-subscriptions-newsdays-web-site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beecher: NYT to join the paywall brigade</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/21/new-york-times-to-join-the-paywall-brigade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/21/new-york-times-to-join-the-paywall-brigade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Beecher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=111191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <i>New York Times</i> will introduce a charge for readers to use its website next year, heralding the most important development so far in the agonising who-will-pay-for-quality-journalism debate. The world of free journalism will never be the same.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/21/new-york-times-to-join-the-paywall-brigade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crikey Wrap: Moving with the NY Times</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/21/crikey-wrap-moving-with-the-ny-times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/21/crikey-wrap-moving-with-the-ny-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey Intern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crikey wrap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=111254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <i>NY Times</i> has announced that it will resurrect a paywall for its online content, sending media geeks and commentators' fingers flying over whether it will work and What It All Means. <em>Crikey</em> intern <b>Flint Duxfield</b> takes a look at what they're saying.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/21/crikey-wrap-moving-with-the-ny-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News aggregators really are killing newspapers</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/its-true-news-aggregators-are-spelling-doom-for-newspapers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/its-true-news-aggregators-are-spelling-doom-for-newspapers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=111175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research has found more and more people just skim the aggregated headlines on sites like Google News to get their daily news fix, and never click through to the original stories.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/its-true-news-aggregators-are-spelling-doom-for-newspapers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY Times reveals its paywall plans</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/business/media/21times.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/business/media/21times.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=111101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <em>New York Times</em> unveils its plans for the future of <em>NYTimes.com</em>: readers will get a flat number of free articles per month before having to pay.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/business/media/21times.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times to go paywall</title>
		<link>http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/01/new_york_times_set_to_mimic_ws.html</link>
		<comments>http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/01/new_york_times_set_to_mimic_ws.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=110143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>New York</em> magazine claims the <em>New York Times</em> is soon to announce that it will start charging readers for access to its website, adopting a "metered system" (ie x number of articles free per day, pay for the rest) akin to that of the <em><a href="http://www.ft.com">Financial Times</a></em>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/01/new_york_times_set_to_mimic_ws.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ninemsn nails its colours to the mast: information should be free</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2009/12/16/ninemsn-nails-its-colours-to-the-mast-information-is-free/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2009/12/16/ninemsn-nails-its-colours-to-the-mast-information-is-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hal Crawford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ninemsn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=106426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Ninemsn</em> news executive producer Hal Crawford has written a distinctly bolshie <a href="http://news.ninemsn.com.au/Blog.aspx?blogentryid=547597&#038;showcomments=true">blog post</a> arguing that Rupert Murdoch's paywall push is a threat to freedom, reports <b>Margaret Simons</b>. Given it's the most popular news website in the country, that's no small thing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2009/12/16/ninemsn-nails-its-colours-to-the-mast-information-is-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The future of online news: the &#8216;living story&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2009/12/09/the-contours-of-the-new-google-and-the-living-story/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2009/12/09/the-contours-of-the-new-google-and-the-living-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Living Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=104753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is experimenting with a concept in online news: the '<a href="http://livingstories.googlelabs.com/">living story</a>', where stories are unified on a single page, which is updated as new developments occur. It needs some work, says <b>Margaret Simons</b>, but it could still be a game changer.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2009/12/09/the-contours-of-the-new-google-and-the-living-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Variety goes paywall</title>
		<link>http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118012435.html?categoryid=14&#038;cs=1</link>
		<comments>http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118012435.html?categoryid=14&#038;cs=1#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Variety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=104867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There goes another one: entertainment industry bible <em>Variety</em> is putting up a paywall tomorrow. It's an icon of the industry, but with a $248-a-year subscription fee, its real cachet will be put to the test. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118012435.html?categoryid=14&#038;cs=1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1632/1899 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-11 00:20:59 -->
