<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; online media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/online-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Crikey says: the age of pragmatism</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/07/crikey-says-the-age-of-pragmatism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/07/crikey-says-the-age-of-pragmatism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 02:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=227672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We forgive News Limited’s Richard Freudenstein for using the word "freemium" at least half a dozen times in a speech delivered this morning at the Mumbrella 360 conference.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/07/crikey-says-the-age-of-pragmatism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The rise and rise of LinkedIn &#8230; but devil&#8217;s in the detail</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/20/the-rise-and-rise-of-linkedin-but-devils-in-the-detail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/20/the-rise-and-rise-of-linkedin-but-devils-in-the-detail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 03:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dotcom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=224410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LinkedIn’s float on the New York Stock Exchange has blown away expectations, delivering the company a valuation of about $US10 billion, writes <b>Charis Palmer</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/20/the-rise-and-rise-of-linkedin-but-devils-in-the-detail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New media v old media: a question of moderation</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/11/new-media-v-old-media-a-question-of-moderation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/11/new-media-v-old-media-a-question-of-moderation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 03:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moderation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Australian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=222548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question of pre-moderation vs post-moderation of reader comments on a publisher website is a fascinating one. It’s also increasingly integral to modern news outlets, writes <b>Jonathon Oake</b> at blog <em>The Spongeist</em>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/11/new-media-v-old-media-a-question-of-moderation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The internet vs. the world part 1: gatekeepers lose control as we connect</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/20/the-internet-v-the-world-part-1-gatekeepers-lose-control-as-we-connect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/20/the-internet-v-the-world-part-1-gatekeepers-lose-control-as-we-connect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Channel Nine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prime Minister Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Australian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Underbelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=193886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From WikiLeaks to <i>Underbelly</i>, the common theme of the rise of the internet is that it connects people. And interconnectedness threatens the powerful.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/20/the-internet-v-the-world-part-1-gatekeepers-lose-control-as-we-connect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McClelland&#8217;s sensitive information debate, circa 1985</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/06/crikey-says-mcclellands-sensitive-information-debate-circa-1985/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/06/crikey-says-mcclellands-sensitive-information-debate-circa-1985/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 02:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cablegate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McClelland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=190740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If McClelland thinks there is a debate to be had over media handling of national security information, he should throw it open to the media most likely to offer the sort of coverage he appears concerned about.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/06/crikey-says-mcclellands-sensitive-information-debate-circa-1985/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Note to The Australian: Twitter is not a newspaper</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/02/note-to-the-australian-twitter-is-not-a-newspaper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/02/note-to-the-australian-twitter-is-not-a-newspaper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 02:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julie Posetti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Australian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitdef]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=190266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Oz editor Chris Mitchell complains that Julie Posetti didn’t contact him to get his side of the story before tweeting, he completely misses the point.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/02/note-to-the-australian-twitter-is-not-a-newspaper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sophie Cunningham: is writing evolving?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/25/sophie-cunningham-is-writing-evolving/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/25/sophie-cunningham-is-writing-evolving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 02:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulletin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christos Tsiolkas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Les Murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meanjin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=188476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is form following function? Are we evolving? Or, to the question I want to consider here: is writing evolving? And is there a danger of Australian writers losing their distinctive voice, asks writer and editor <b>Sophie Cunningham</b>?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/25/sophie-cunningham-is-writing-evolving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bartholomeusz: Fairfax strategy not crazy or brave</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/23/bartholomeusz-fairfax-strategy-not-crazy-or-brave/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/23/bartholomeusz-fairfax-strategy-not-crazy-or-brave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 02:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Bartholomeusz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fred hilmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=187777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone expecting something radical or brave from Fairfax Media’s long-awaited strategy update today would have been under-whelmed. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/23/bartholomeusz-fairfax-strategy-not-crazy-or-brave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest newspaper circulation figures: not a nice set of numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/12/latest-newspaper-circulation-figures-not-a-nice-set-of-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/12/latest-newspaper-circulation-figures-not-a-nice-set-of-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audit burea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circulation figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=185203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only a fool would say that circulation figures don’t lie, given all we have learned in recent times. But even so, these numbers tell us the dead tree ship is sinking.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/12/latest-newspaper-circulation-figures-not-a-nice-set-of-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How online media humanizes Middle Eastern people</title>
		<link>http://newmatilda.com/2010/11/02/how-meet-palestinians</link>
		<comments>http://newmatilda.com/2010/11/02/how-meet-palestinians#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle east]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[western media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=182565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While western mainstream media coverage continues to perpetuate myths and stereotypes about the Middle East, online media - particularly blogs - have emerged as powerful tools to show the faces and personalities of everyday people, writes <b>Daz Chandler</b>. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newmatilda.com/2010/11/02/how-meet-palestinians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pimply? Angry? Drunk? Yawn.</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/10/12/crikey-says-pimply-angry-drunk-yawn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/10/12/crikey-says-pimply-angry-drunk-yawn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 02:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howard kurtz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Beast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tina Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=177674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Most citizen journalism strikes me as nothing to do with journalism at all." Are we still using this old argument?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/10/12/crikey-says-pimply-angry-drunk-yawn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The new New Matilda</title>
		<link>http://newmatilda.com/2010/10/08/did-you-miss-us-new-matilda-way-back</link>
		<comments>http://newmatilda.com/2010/10/08/did-you-miss-us-new-matilda-way-back#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 23:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Matilda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=177220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online commentary website <em>New Matilda</em> is reopening its virtual doors once more, after a <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/27/breaking-new-matilda-to-fold/">well-publicised closure</a> in June. It'll return as a paid subscriber site, and expects to be back to full publishing capacity in 2011.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newmatilda.com/2010/10/08/did-you-miss-us-new-matilda-way-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Andrew Bolt is wrong, says Fake Andrew Bolt</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/04/real-andrew-bolt-is-wrong-says-fake-andrew-bolt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/04/real-andrew-bolt-is-wrong-says-fake-andrew-bolt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 03:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Bolt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists on Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=161367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Bolt has charged that I am too close to his writing and not parodic enough, perhaps not realising that this reflects worse on him than it does on me, writes <b>Fake Andrew Bolt</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/04/real-andrew-bolt-is-wrong-says-fake-andrew-bolt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When online media outlets pay peanuts, they get monkeys</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/28/when-online-media-outlets-pay-peanuts-they-get-monkeys/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/28/when-online-media-outlets-pay-peanuts-they-get-monkeys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 03:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mel Campbell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freelance journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Matilda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=142167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Freelancers are increasingly waking up to realise that if their work is good enough for a commercial outlet, they deserve to be paid. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/28/when-online-media-outlets-pay-peanuts-they-get-monkeys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The regulator and the regulated: sorry, but the internet won&#8217;t play that game</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/27/the-regulator-and-the-regulated-sorry-but-the-internet-wont-play-that-game/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/27/the-regulator-and-the-regulated-sorry-but-the-internet-wont-play-that-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 03:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=141733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy rants at Google and Facebook. But he hasn't worked out that they don't play that game, and aren't that interested in what governments think.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/27/the-regulator-and-the-regulated-sorry-but-the-internet-wont-play-that-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The death of New Matilda is bad news for everyone</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/27/crikey-says-the-death-of-new-matilda-is-bad-news-for-everyone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/27/crikey-says-the-death-of-new-matilda-is-bad-news-for-everyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 03:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Matilda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=141641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Australian online news and commentary site <i>New Matilda</i> announced it's calling it quits. This is bad news for everyone.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/27/crikey-says-the-death-of-new-matilda-is-bad-news-for-everyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New media may challenge Berlusconi&#8217;s grip on power</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/29/new-media-may-challenge-berlusconis-grip-on-power/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/29/new-media-may-challenge-berlusconis-grip-on-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey Intern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silvio Berlusconi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=133387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technological improvement may be shaping the Italian media landscape in such way as to undermine Silvio Berlusconi’s future grip on national media. <i>Crikey</i> intern -- and proud Italian -- <b>Patrick Tombola</b> reports.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/29/new-media-may-challenge-berlusconis-grip-on-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just how big is the Facebook economy?</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/mar/10/facebook-economy</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/mar/10/facebook-economy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=122339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Investors are putting more and more money into businesses building Facebook games, apps and services, and the <em>Guardian</em> wants to know just <em>how</em> much: is Facebook the next big economy, or a bubble waiting to burst? Help them find out.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/mar/10/facebook-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Margaret Simons: Crikey still meeting the challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/18/margaret-simons-crikey-still-meeting-the-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/18/margaret-simons-crikey-still-meeting-the-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 02:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crikey's 10th birthday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=117579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crikey has what so many traditional publishers want -- the hybrid model whereby some content is paid for by the viewer, and other content is free.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/18/margaret-simons-crikey-still-meeting-the-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The science behind the NYT &#8220;most emailed&#8221; list</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/09/science/09tier.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/09/science/09tier.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=115498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[University researchers have been studying the "most emailed" <em>New York Times</em> articles to see what kind of news people like to share -- and why. The results are not what you might expect.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/09/science/09tier.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook: the world&#8217;s newspaper</title>
		<link>http://business.theatlantic.com/2010/02/is_facebook_not_google_the_real_global_newspaper.php</link>
		<comments>http://business.theatlantic.com/2010/02/is_facebook_not_google_the_real_global_newspaper.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 06:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=114729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget aggregators and e-readers, the real digital news revolution is taking place on Facebook, which is now <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/us-heather-hopkins/2010/02/facebook_largest_news_reader_1.html">the fourth largest source</a> of traffic for media. Do we now only read what our friends tell/want us to read?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://business.theatlantic.com/2010/02/is_facebook_not_google_the_real_global_newspaper.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online media leads the way in horrific humanitarian crises</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/15/online-wins-as-gold-coast-bully-shows-how-not-to-do-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/15/online-wins-as-gold-coast-bully-shows-how-not-to-do-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haiti earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humanitarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humanitarian disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online participation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=109874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online media may still be tying itself in knots over the small matter of how to make money but when it comes to covering horrific humanitarian crises, it really comes into its own.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/15/online-wins-as-gold-coast-bully-shows-how-not-to-do-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No ads cause newspapers&#8217; nightmare on E-street</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/12/no-ads-cause-newspapers-nightmare-on-e-street/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/12/no-ads-cause-newspapers-nightmare-on-e-street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Australian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=109003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can the e-reader save newspapers and quality journalism? In a word, no.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/12/no-ads-cause-newspapers-nightmare-on-e-street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salon: from web magazine to web publication</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/web-magazine-salon-fires-six-staffers-voila-%E2%80%94%C2%A0now-a-web-publication/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/web-magazine-salon-fires-six-staffers-voila-%E2%80%94%C2%A0now-a-web-publication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=80789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What's the difference between a web magazine and a web publication? Don't ask us, but that's the justification being used by <em><a href="http://www.salon.com">Salon</a></em> CEO Richard Gingras for firing six staff members.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/web-magazine-salon-fires-six-staffers-voila-%E2%80%94%C2%A0now-a-web-publication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Line Opinion opens editorial complaint to public</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/17/how-very-grown-up-online-opinion-editorial-complaint-as-dialogue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/17/how-very-grown-up-online-opinion-editorial-complaint-as-dialogue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Dodd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graham Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Line Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/17/how-very-grown-up-online-opinion-editorial-complaint-as-dialogue/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An exchange between the chief editor of Australian e-journal <em>On Line Opinion</em>, Graham Young, and NSW Greens MP Lee Rhiannon, whose story he didn't publish, reveals the inner thoughts of an online media outlet. Refreshing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/17/how-very-grown-up-online-opinion-editorial-complaint-as-dialogue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1644/1905 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 02:50:00 -->
