<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; nuclear power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/nuclear-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The energy paper&#8217;s peculiar logic about nuclear power</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/14/the-energy-papers-peculiar-logic-about-nuclear-power/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/14/the-energy-papers-peculiar-logic-about-nuclear-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 01:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy white paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uranium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=265071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The draft energy white paper proposes that nuclear power could be a backstop power supply decades hence. But it takes some unusual twists of logic to do it.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/14/the-energy-papers-peculiar-logic-about-nuclear-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>90</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Essential: no to uranium exports to India, yes to mining tax</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/21/essential-no-to-uranium-exports-to-india-yes-to-mining-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/21/essential-no-to-uranium-exports-to-india-yes-to-mining-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon pricing package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Essential Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial relations reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRRT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uranium exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WorkChoices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=260344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Voters back the mining tax but oppose uranium exports to India, today's Essential Report shows. And voters are less concerned about a return to Workchoices.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/21/essential-no-to-uranium-exports-to-india-yes-to-mining-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labor&#8217;s incoherent nuclear policy</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/15/labors-incoherent-nuclear-policy-and-the-howard-legacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/15/labors-incoherent-nuclear-policy-and-the-howard-legacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALP national conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uranium exports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=259206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exporting uranium to India will boost its civilian and military nuclear programs. But it's unclear exactly how Labor feels on the issue.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/15/labors-incoherent-nuclear-policy-and-the-howard-legacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>111</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BHP and the new maths of nuclear reactors</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/17/bhp-and-the-new-maths-of-nuclear-reactors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/17/bhp-and-the-new-maths-of-nuclear-reactors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 02:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympic dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uranium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=223684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BHP is charging ahead with its Olympic Dam project despite the worldwide pause on nuclear power caused by Fukushima.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/17/bhp-and-the-new-maths-of-nuclear-reactors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leave Jim Schembri alone</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/20/leave-jim-schembri-alone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/20/leave-jim-schembri-alone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 02:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Your Say: Daily Mail readers' feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fukushima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Schembri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=218911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crikey reads have their say.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/20/leave-jim-schembri-alone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The nuclear debate&#8217;s healthy green glow</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/19/the-nuclear-debates-healthy-green-glow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/19/the-nuclear-debates-healthy-green-glow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 03:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Your Say: Daily Mail readers' feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fukushima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larissa Behrendt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SBS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=218587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crikey readers have their say.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/19/the-nuclear-debates-healthy-green-glow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nucle-yay or nay? How Japan has divided critics</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2011/03/22/nucle-yay-or-nay-how-japan-has-divided-critics/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2011/03/22/nucle-yay-or-nay-how-japan-has-divided-critics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 21:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amber Jamieson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan nuclear disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan nuclear power plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=212434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One interesting thing to come out of the Japanese quake and resulting ongoing difficulties at the Fukushima nuclear plant, is the two vastly different takes on the issue of nuclear power, writes <b>Amber Jamieson</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2011/03/22/nucle-yay-or-nay-how-japan-has-divided-critics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monbiot: Japan&#8217;s nuclear disaster made me a nuclear power fan</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/21/pro-nuclear-japan-fukushima</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/21/pro-nuclear-japan-fukushima#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Monbiot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan nuclear disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power plants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=212203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fukushima plant in Japan was aging, lacking in safety features, hit by a gigantic earthquake and tsunami and <em>still</em> didn't kill anyone with radiation poisoning. Rather than discouraging <b>George Monbiot</b> from nuclear power, it's suddenly a far more attractive option.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/21/pro-nuclear-japan-fukushima/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuclear crisis: &#8216;we are getting closer to bringing the situation under control&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/21/nuclear-crisis-we-are-getting-closer-to-bringing-the-situation-under-control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/21/nuclear-crisis-we-are-getting-closer-to-bringing-the-situation-under-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 02:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Barry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan nuclear disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan nuclear power plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=211962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The crisis isn’t over at Japan’s crippled Daiichi nuclear plant, but the situation is still improving. One Japanese official said: "We are getting closer to bringing the situation under control."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/21/nuclear-crisis-we-are-getting-closer-to-bringing-the-situation-under-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Essential: shock &#8212; support drops for nuclear</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/21/essential-abbott-has-them-confused-and-shock-support-drops-for-nuclear/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/21/essential-abbott-has-them-confused-and-shock-support-drops-for-nuclear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 02:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Essential Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=211890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unsurprisingly, support for nuclear power has plunged following Fukushima, according to today's Essential Poll. And Tony Abbott's inconsistency on climate change has left voters confused.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/21/essential-abbott-has-them-confused-and-shock-support-drops-for-nuclear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For Victoria, nuclear power was oh so close</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/21/for-victoria-nuclear-power-was-oh-so-close/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/21/for-victoria-nuclear-power-was-oh-so-close/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 02:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan nuclear disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[werribee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=211785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A secret report for the SEC by British Electricity International in November 1980 envisaged the construction of a nuclear power station, which could have been operational by 2000, writes <b>Bill Birnbauer</b>, senior lecturer in journalism, Monash University]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/21/for-victoria-nuclear-power-was-oh-so-close/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Japan&#8217;s nuclear crisis: danger cools, but still no obvious fix</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/18/japans-nuclear-crisis-danger-cools-but-still-no-obvious-fix/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/18/japans-nuclear-crisis-danger-cools-but-still-no-obvious-fix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 02:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Barry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan nuclear disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan nuclear power plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=211468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The crisis at Japan’s crippled Fukushima nuclear facility may be cooling. But serious problems remain with unit 4, which contains spent a couple of hundred nuclear fuel rods in a deep concrete pool that is either empty or very low in water.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/18/japans-nuclear-crisis-danger-cools-but-still-no-obvious-fix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fukushima directly from the Dr Strangelove script</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/18/rundle-fukushima-directly-from-the-dr-strangelove-script/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/18/rundle-fukushima-directly-from-the-dr-strangelove-script/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 02:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy Rundle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Rundle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan nuclear disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan tsunami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=211309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fukushima disaster is not merely about one event at one plant. A pause on nuclear power is spreading across the world, with China -- China -- the latest country to announce a pause on construction to examine the industry.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/18/rundle-fukushima-directly-from-the-dr-strangelove-script/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists hold their breath on Japan&#8217;s nuclear disaster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2011/03/17/scientists-hold-their-breath-on-japans-nuclear-disaster/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2011/03/17/scientists-hold-their-breath-on-japans-nuclear-disaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 05:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power generation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=211271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The situation at Fukushima seems to be getting worse, writes <em>Crikey</em>'s <b>Paul Barry</b>. With no scientific consensus, and conflicting reports from authorities, the experts are holding their breath for Japan.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2011/03/17/scientists-hold-their-breath-on-japans-nuclear-disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fukushima wrecks the already problematic finances of nuclear power</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/16/fukushima-wrecks-the-already-problematic-finances-of-nuclear-power/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/16/fukushima-wrecks-the-already-problematic-finances-of-nuclear-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 01:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fukushima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=210772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Financing new nuclear power stations is difficult enough at the best of times. Fukushima will make the maths even harder for years to come.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/16/fukushima-wrecks-the-already-problematic-finances-of-nuclear-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Japan&#8217;s nuclear crisis: the technical facts</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2011/03/16/japans-nuclear-crisis-the-technical-facts/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2011/03/16/japans-nuclear-crisis-the-technical-facts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 23:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan nuclear power plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear explosion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=210761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fire broke out in reactor 4 at the troubled Fukushima nuclear plant this morning. <b>Michael R James</b> summarises exactly what has happened -- from explosions to failed cooling attempts -- at Japan's quake-affected nuclear plants.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2011/03/16/japans-nuclear-crisis-the-technical-facts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How a nuclear reactor works</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/03/12/world/asia/the-explosion-at-the-japanese-reactor.html?ref=asia</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/03/12/world/asia/the-explosion-at-the-japanese-reactor.html?ref=asia#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power plants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=210733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you're struggling to understand exactly why the Japanese nuclear reactors needs to be covered in sea water and how nuclear rods remain protected inside a nuclear reactor, then check out this clever graphic.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/03/12/world/asia/the-explosion-at-the-japanese-reactor.html?ref=asia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ideology dividing both parties</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/17/policies-and-personalities-causing-grief-on-both-sides/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/17/policies-and-personalities-causing-grief-on-both-sides/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 01:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum seekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Morrison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uranium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=204374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ideology and personalities are usually the stumbling blocks to political unity. But they work in quite different ways in the Liberal and Labor parties.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/17/policies-and-personalities-causing-grief-on-both-sides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How long will Labor hold its anti nuclear line?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/06/how-long-will-labor-hold-its-anti-nuclear-line/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/06/how-long-will-labor-hold-its-anti-nuclear-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 02:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Cowie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALP national conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear waste dump]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=190554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Labor government is holding firmly to its anti nuclear platform for now but the rumblings of dissent from within the party are growing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/06/how-long-will-labor-hold-its-anti-nuclear-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The government&#8217;s strange flip flops on nuclear</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/13/the-governments-strange-flip-flops-on-nuclear/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/13/the-governments-strange-flip-flops-on-nuclear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 03:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Commission on Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=138141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This government has an extraordinarily inconsistent attitude toward nuclear issues. It refuses to countenance an Australian nuclear power industry and launched the International Commission on Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/13/the-governments-strange-flip-flops-on-nuclear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate scientist: nuclear power can save us</title>
		<link>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/only-a-carbon-tax-and-nuclear-power-can-save-us/story-e6frg6zo-1225839327862</link>
		<comments>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/only-a-carbon-tax-and-nuclear-power-can-save-us/story-e6frg6zo-1225839327862#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap and trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=122372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NASA scientist <b>James Hansen</b> says that cap-and-trade schemes are "hokey" and will never be accepted by developing countries. Only a carbon tax and the use of nuclear power will work to battle climate change.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/only-a-carbon-tax-and-nuclear-power-can-save-us/story-e6frg6zo-1225839327862/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ziggy voted down in public debate on nuclear energy</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/05/ziggy-voted-down-in-public-debate-on-nuclear-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/05/ziggy-voted-down-in-public-debate-on-nuclear-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james hansen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ziggy switkowski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=121123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A pro-nuclear camp led by nuclear physics boffin Dr Ziggy Switkowski failed to convince a crowd of sceptics that uranium is a solution to a carbon-constrained future, <b>Timothy Roberts</b> reports.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/05/ziggy-voted-down-in-public-debate-on-nuclear-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenies go cool on Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/18/science/earth/18enviros.html?ref=earth</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/18/science/earth/18enviros.html?ref=earth#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 05:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey Intern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=118512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of Barack Obama's most reliable cheerleaders have turned against him following his calls for greater investment in nuclear power. The bright green promised future under Obama is looking a little dull.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/18/science/earth/18enviros.html?ref=earth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to site a nuclear waste dump</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/22/how-to-site-a-nuclear-waste-dump/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/22/how-to-site-a-nuclear-waste-dump/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 02:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Territory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=118335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Labor's opposition to an NT waste dump before the last election will return to haunt it as Martin Ferguson unveils a permanent waste facility this week. Where was the consent and consultation?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/22/how-to-site-a-nuclear-waste-dump/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama’s nuclear solution no political peace offering</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/18/obama%e2%80%99s-nuclear-solution-no-political-peace-offering/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/18/obama%e2%80%99s-nuclear-solution-no-political-peace-offering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 02:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harley Dennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=117613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama has boldly made nuclear energy a key part of America's future. It makes Kevin Rudd's firm rejection of nuclear use a positively liberal stance, writes <b>Harley Dennett</b> from Washington DC.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/18/obama%e2%80%99s-nuclear-solution-no-political-peace-offering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1602/1878 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 02:32:03 -->
