<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; news aggregation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/news-aggregation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>News aggregators really are killing newspapers</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/its-true-news-aggregators-are-spelling-doom-for-newspapers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/its-true-news-aggregators-are-spelling-doom-for-newspapers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=111175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research has found more and more people just skim the aggregated headlines on sites like Google News to get their daily news fix, and never click through to the original stories.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/its-true-news-aggregators-are-spelling-doom-for-newspapers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google: How we can save newspapers</title>
		<link>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107104574569570797550520.html</link>
		<comments>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107104574569570797550520.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Schmidt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of medua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[must read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=103149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frustrated newspaper executives need to stop blaming Google for their woes, writes the company's CEO <b>Eric Schmidt</b>: Google News provides their sites with billions of clicks every month -- and it wants to work <em>with</em> them to build bigger audiences and make more money.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107104574569570797550520.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Rupert, this is how the internet works. Google it.</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/10/dear-rupert-this-is-how-the-internet-works-google-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/10/dear-rupert-this-is-how-the-internet-works-google-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/10/dear-rupert-this-is-how-the-internet-works-google-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch may be rich, clever and influential, but <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/nov/09/murdoch-google">his plan</a> to remove News Corp content from Google's index is just daft. If he wants us to read his stories, let alone pay for them, we have to be able to find them first.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/10/dear-rupert-this-is-how-the-internet-works-google-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Future of the ABC: less broadcaster, more webmaster</title>
		<link>http://www.nationaltimes.com.au/opinion/blogs/the-vulture/the-abc-of-the-web/20091027-hism.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.nationaltimes.com.au/opinion/blogs/the-vulture/the-abc-of-the-web/20091027-hism.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public broadcasting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=95637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/news/entertainment/tv--radio/abc-to-cut-back-top-arts-program/2009/10/25/1256405307233.html">The shift</a> in the ABC's Arts programming from TV and radio to the web heralds a much larger metamorphosis for the broadcaster, in which the web is its primary form and other mediums just exist to feed it content, writes <b>Karl Quinn</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nationaltimes.com.au/opinion/blogs/the-vulture/the-abc-of-the-web/20091027-hism.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News Ltd&#8217;s hypocrisy: Don&#8217;t aggregate us (but do Digg, Reddit and Tweet us&#8230;)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2009/10/14/news-versus-public-broadcasting-with-special-guest-the-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2009/10/14/news-versus-public-broadcasting-with-special-guest-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=92802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Rupert Murdoch, Google and other content "kleptomaniacs" are stealing and profiting from his content. But what do you find at the end of the every News article? A "Share This" request for readera to promote the story on the very sites that Murdoch decries.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2009/10/14/news-versus-public-broadcasting-with-special-guest-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rupert the Sun King&#8217;s moral posture takes on a slouch</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/12/rupert-the-sun-kings-moral-posture-takes-on-a-slouch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/12/rupert-the-sun-kings-moral-posture-takes-on-a-slouch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sun Weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Media Summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/12/rupert-the-sun-kings-moral-posture-takes-on-a-slouch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the weekend, Rupert Murdoch used some nasty language at the so-called World Media Summit in Beijing to slag off the likes of Google and Yahoo, describing them as content "kleptomaniacs" because they aggregate News Corporation’s content.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/12/rupert-the-sun-kings-moral-posture-takes-on-a-slouch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atlantic Wire: the new kid on the news aggregator block</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticwire.com</link>
		<comments>http://www.theatlanticwire.com#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlantic Wire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=87230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems everyone is getting into the news aggregation game now: <em>The Atlantic</em> has just launched <em><a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com">The Atlantic Wire</a></em>, pulling together the best and most influential op-eds from around the media. Nicely done.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theatlanticwire.com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can newspapers and aggregators ever be friends?</title>
		<link>http://paidcontent.org/article/419-interview-google-news-josh-cohen-can-the-aggregator-ever-win-over-publi/</link>
		<comments>http://paidcontent.org/article/419-interview-google-news-josh-cohen-can-the-aggregator-ever-win-over-publi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=85851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Google News, business product manager Josh Cohen is the man who deals with angry newspaper publishers, many of whom blame the company for the current media industry slump. Will the two ever kiss and make-up? Cohen shares his thoughts. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://paidcontent.org/article/419-interview-google-news-josh-cohen-can-the-aggregator-ever-win-over-publi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HuffPost Social: the future or the death of journalism?</title>
		<link>http://www.thebigmoney.com/articles/impressions/2009/08/18/huffington-post-facebook-future-journalism?page=full</link>
		<comments>http://www.thebigmoney.com/articles/impressions/2009/08/18/huffington-post-facebook-future-journalism?page=full#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 02:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=80693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>The Huffington Post</em> has partnered with Facebook to release a new feature called HuffPost Social News, allowing users to track and share the <em>HuffPo</em> articles they're reading. It's the <em>future</em>of journalism, says <b>Chadwick Matlin</b>, although it won't necessarily be its saviour.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thebigmoney.com/articles/impressions/2009/08/18/huffington-post-facebook-future-journalism?page=full/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TechCrunch: The &#8220;media bundle&#8221; is dead</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/16/the-media-bundle-is-dead-long-live-the-news-aggregators/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/16/the-media-bundle-is-dead-long-live-the-news-aggregators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 01:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=80208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The era of readers getting all their daily news from a single site is long gone, says <em>TechCrunch</em>'s <b>Erick Schonfeld</b>. Newspapers can either sit around blaming aggregators, or learn how to take advantage of them.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/16/the-media-bundle-is-dead-long-live-the-news-aggregators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Gawker stole my story, killed journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/31/AR2009073102476.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/31/AR2009073102476.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 06:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=77747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Washington Post</em> journo <b>Ian Shapira</b> was delighted to see a story he'd penned featured on hip media gossip site <em><a href="http://www.gawker.com">Gawker</a></em>... until he realised they'd just "cherry picked" his hard work. Sing along if you know the words: "the internet is killing journalism..."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/31/AR2009073102476.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The news aggregator newspapers like</title>
		<link>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/aggregator-newspapers</link>
		<comments>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/aggregator-newspapers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daylife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=76618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newspaper publishers love a good whinge about those free-riding leeches of the media world, news aggregation sites. So why are news orgs like <em>The Washington Post</em>, <em>NPR</em> and <em>Newsweek</em> such big fans of aggregator <a href="http://www.daylife.com/">Daylife</a>? <em>The Observer</em> investigates.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/aggregator-newspapers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google call newspapers&#8217; bluff: here&#8217;s how to opt-out of Google News</title>
		<link>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/google-newspapers-think-were-stealing-you-fine-dont-show-searches</link>
		<comments>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/google-newspapers-think-were-stealing-you-fine-dont-show-searches#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 03:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=74678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newspaper publishers never seem to stop whinging about Google News leeching their content, so Google has <a href="http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/07/working-with-news-publishers.html">given them</a> the simple little bit of code to opt-out of their search results. How many will follow through?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/google-newspapers-think-were-stealing-you-fine-dont-show-searches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Publishers declare war on news aggregators</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2009/jul/13/digital-media-downturn</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2009/jul/13/digital-media-downturn#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=73301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[European publishers have had enough of those nasty leeching news aggregators, penning a petition calling for "urgent improvements in the protection of intellectual property on the internet".]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2009/jul/13/digital-media-downturn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Printed blog&#8217; fails to take media world by storm</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinsider.com/shocker-printing-blogs-proves-to-be-poor-business-2009-7</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessinsider.com/shocker-printing-blogs-proves-to-be-poor-business-2009-7#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Printed Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=72290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Startup newspaper <em>The Printed Blog</em> -- a paper made entirely of aggregated blog posts -- is folding after 16 issues. "Printed online media is dead" says <em>Business Insider</em>. Yeah? Tell that to all the <em>Crikey</em> subscribers who print out their 40-page email Every. Single. Day.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessinsider.com/shocker-printing-blogs-proves-to-be-poor-business-2009-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s not just mad rich men with too much money</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/03/richard-farmers-bite-sized-meaty-chunks-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/03/richard-farmers-bite-sized-meaty-chunks-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Farmer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soccer™]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/03/richard-farmers-bite-sized-meaty-chunks-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Richard Farmer</b> on why football is attractive to crooks, journalists aren't evil bludgers, pollies are cracking down on those darn kids and more.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/03/richard-farmers-bite-sized-meaty-chunks-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six pieces of News Ltd we&#8217;d like to see behind a paywall</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/02/six-pieces-of-news-ltd-wed-like-to-see-behind-a-paywall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/02/six-pieces-of-news-ltd-wed-like-to-see-behind-a-paywall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Keen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hartigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Press Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Limited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid news content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/02/six-pieces-of-news-ltd-wed-like-to-see-behind-a-paywall/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News Ltd CEO John Hartigan is absolutely right: the more News Ltd content that is moved beyond a paywall, the better. Here are some articles we'd like to see there.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/02/six-pieces-of-news-ltd-wed-like-to-see-behind-a-paywall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t screw the internet to save newspapers</title>
		<link>http://valleywag.gawker.com/5305503/lets-screw-up-the-entire-internet-to-save-newspapers</link>
		<comments>http://valleywag.gawker.com/5305503/lets-screw-up-the-entire-internet-to-save-newspapers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Posner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=71050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US Appeals Court judge Richard Posner recently floated the idea of banning online links to stop people stealing newspaper content for nothing. Hey, let's also ban wheels in order to save the horse industry, snarks <b>Hamilton Nolan</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://valleywag.gawker.com/5305503/lets-screw-up-the-entire-internet-to-save-newspapers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle of the new media heavyweights</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/30/battle-of-the-new-media-heavyweights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/30/battle-of-the-new-media-heavyweights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crikey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Punch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=70438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One month since the launch of News Ltd's new site<em>The Punch</em> and a few months since we relaunched our very own <em>Crikey</em> website, the Australian media commentariat are now dutifully weighing in on who is winning the readership wars.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/30/battle-of-the-new-media-heavyweights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could tighter copyright laws save journalism?</title>
		<link>http://www.cleveland.com/schultz/index.ssf/2009/06/tighter_copyright_law_could_sa.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.cleveland.com/schultz/index.ssf/2009/06/tighter_copyright_law_could_sa.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=70228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can quality journalism be preserved in the era of online rehashed churnalism? <b>Connie Schultz</b> thinks American copyright laws need reforming.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cleveland.com/schultz/index.ssf/2009/06/tighter_copyright_law_could_sa.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We are all news aggregators now</title>
		<link>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/we-are-all-aggregators</link>
		<comments>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/we-are-all-aggregators#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=69585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News aggregating isn't just the realm of sites like <em>HuffPo</em> anymore, argues <b>Gillian Reagan</b> -- the "online revolution" borne from the protests in Iran have shown that everyone participating in social media is doing their part. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/we-are-all-aggregators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Huffington Post: cheap, trashy and parasitic</title>
		<link>http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=137437</link>
		<comments>http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=137437#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arianna Huffington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=68697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>The Huffington Post</em> "likes to masquerade as a forward-thinking, paradigm-shifting journalistic institution", says <b>Simon Dumenco</b>, but they don't pay most of their writers, and leech most of their content from "real" journalists. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=137437/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Name-based news aggregation</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/06/a-little-creepy-name-based-news-aggregation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/06/a-little-creepy-name-based-news-aggregation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=67079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New site <a href="http://www.dailyperfect.com">Daily Perfect</a> offers a page of news articles it thinks you may like, based purely on your name. It's a little creepy, but at least a fresh take on news aggregation.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/06/a-little-creepy-name-based-news-aggregation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HuffPo&#8217;s front page: only 6% original content</title>
		<link>http://bloggasm.com/6-of-huffington-posts-front-page-stories-contain-original-reporting-from-the-site</link>
		<comments>http://bloggasm.com/6-of-huffington-posts-front-page-stories-contain-original-reporting-from-the-site#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arianna Huffington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=64284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bloggasm uses the power of maths to assess whether the <em>Huffington Post</em> is " making a significant contribution to original reporting." The result? Not so much.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://bloggasm.com/6-of-huffington-posts-front-page-stories-contain-original-reporting-from-the-site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google: &#8220;Frenemy&#8221; of the NY Times</title>
		<link>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/bill-kellers-best-frenemy</link>
		<comments>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/bill-kellers-best-frenemy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 03:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=60128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google, with its popular Google News aggregation system, isn't an "ally" of the <em>New York Times</em> -- but it isn't a parasite, either, says Executive Editor Bill Keller.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/bill-kellers-best-frenemy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1646/1908 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 07:44:43 -->
