<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; new media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/new-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The enthusiastic future of new media</title>
		<link>http://www.theenthusiast.com.au/archives/2012/the-future-of-enthusiasm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theenthusiast.com.au/archives/2012/the-future-of-enthusiasm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Enthusiast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=271748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Founder of pop culture site <em>The Enthusiast</em> <b>Mel Campbell</b> explains the difficulty of running an news site that takes time but pays no money and how unwilling readers are to pay for online media.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theenthusiast.com.au/archives/2012/the-future-of-enthusiasm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Kid on The Block: the enthusiasm of The Enthusiast</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/01/30/new-kid-on-the-block-the-enthusiasm-of-the-enthusiast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/01/30/new-kid-on-the-block-the-enthusiasm-of-the-enthusiast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Kid on the Block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[start-up companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Enthusiast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=271374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The story of bright indy publication <em>The Enthusiast</em> is sobering for those who embrace the possibilities of new media.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/01/30/new-kid-on-the-block-the-enthusiasm-of-the-enthusiast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kiwi pointers on how to define news media, beef up regulation</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/01/20/kiwi-pointers-on-how-to-define-news-media-beef-up-regulation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/01/20/kiwi-pointers-on-how-to-define-news-media-beef-up-regulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finkelstein media inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new zealand law commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new zealand media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Finkelstein]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=269816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Zealand Law Commission recently released an issues paper that elegantly deals with the very same issues the Finkelstein inquiry is considering in Australia, including how to define "news media" in the internet age, and what a beefed up regulation system might look like.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/01/20/kiwi-pointers-on-how-to-define-news-media-beef-up-regulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simons: being first, or being right?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/08/simons-being-first-or-being-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/08/simons-being-first-or-being-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 03:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news cycle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=245901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If mainstream media outlets spend their diminishing resources in a futile battle to be first, then they will race themselves out of business to no useful end. That is not where resources should be deployed.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/08/simons-being-first-or-being-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simons: will Fairfax apps change the fundamental outlook?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/02/simons-will-fairfax-apps-change-the-fundamental-outlook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/02/simons-will-fairfax-apps-change-the-fundamental-outlook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 03:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The SMH]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=226926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can the slick new Fairfax apps for The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald save the newspaper journalism  business model? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/02/simons-will-fairfax-apps-change-the-fundamental-outlook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New media v old media: a question of moderation</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/11/new-media-v-old-media-a-question-of-moderation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/11/new-media-v-old-media-a-question-of-moderation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 03:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moderation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Australian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=222548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question of pre-moderation vs post-moderation of reader comments on a publisher website is a fascinating one. It’s also increasingly integral to modern news outlets, writes <b>Jonathon Oake</b> at blog <em>The Spongeist</em>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/11/new-media-v-old-media-a-question-of-moderation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tanner fights the devil of fragmentation, and maybe the ghosts of the Hawke-Keating years</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/02/tanner-fights-the-devil-of-fragmentation-and-maybe-the-ghosts-of-the-hawke-keating-years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/02/tanner-fights-the-devil-of-fragmentation-and-maybe-the-ghosts-of-the-hawke-keating-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 03:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Tanner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press gallery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=220311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lindsay Tanner's concerns about the dumbing down of democracy reflect fundamental changes in our media driven by the internet. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/02/tanner-fights-the-devil-of-fragmentation-and-maybe-the-ghosts-of-the-hawke-keating-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Convergence and the great tradition of stifling innovation</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/29/convergence-and-the-great-tradition-of-stifling-innovation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/29/convergence-and-the-great-tradition-of-stifling-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 03:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convergence review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy Wu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=220116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[History shows big media have successfully used regulation to stifle competition. The Convergence Review poses the same threat.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/29/convergence-and-the-great-tradition-of-stifling-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is &#8216;exposure&#8217; worth working for free?</title>
		<link>http://newmatilda.com/2011/04/21/squeeze-worth-juice</link>
		<comments>http://newmatilda.com/2011/04/21/squeeze-worth-juice#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 02:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=219338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A group of freelancers are suing <em>Huffington Post</em> for compensation over past work they did for free. Online publishers -- including <em>Crikey</em> -- often have writers work for free. Should writers do it?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newmatilda.com/2011/04/21/squeeze-worth-juice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Superinjunctions and the Streisand Effect</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/31/superinjunctions-and-the-streisand-effect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/31/superinjunctions-and-the-streisand-effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superinjunctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK legal system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=214731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A superinjunction is now the ideal way to attract attention to legal cases that would otherwise be ignored.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/31/superinjunctions-and-the-streisand-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple: saving old media, or just making them its bitch?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/09/apple-saving-old-media-or-just-making-them-its-bitch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/09/apple-saving-old-media-or-just-making-them-its-bitch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 01:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=209038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Media is dying", was the call. Now there's a new one: grab an iPad and bend over for Apple. Frustration with Steve Jobs' digital powerhouse is growing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/09/apple-saving-old-media-or-just-making-them-its-bitch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the Huffington Post works (and yes, they pay staff)</title>
		<link>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/10/huffington-post-bloggers_n_821446.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/10/huffington-post-bloggers_n_821446.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=203216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Jason Linkins</b> clears up some of the myths of <em>Huffington Post</em>, explaining that there are paid staff who do the majority of the work behind-the-scenes, although many of the other bloggers whose content is used aren't earning money.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/10/huffington-post-bloggers_n_821446.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smart summer reading: Carr&#8217;s The Shallows &#8212; a big grizzle about the net</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/01/18/smart-summer-reading-carrs-the-shallows-a-big-grizzle-about-the-net/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/01/18/smart-summer-reading-carrs-the-shallows-a-big-grizzle-about-the-net/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Carr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Shallows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=197076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The internet is turning us into “pancake people” -- flat and wide, with no depth to our thought, according to Nick Carr. But is that shallow thinking? asks <b>Ben Gook</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/01/18/smart-summer-reading-carrs-the-shallows-a-big-grizzle-about-the-net/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New New Matilda attempts old old media strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/10/new-new-matilda-attempts-old-old-media-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/10/new-new-matilda-attempts-old-old-media-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 02:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amber Jamieson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death of new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marni Cordell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Matilda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=191933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If online commentary website <em>New Matilda</em> doesn't raise more than $60,000 in the last week of its last-ditch subscriberthon, its virtual doors will be shut permanently.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/10/new-new-matilda-attempts-old-old-media-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Matilda: $80,000 in two weeks?</title>
		<link>http://newmatilda.com/2010/12/01/clocks-ticking</link>
		<comments>http://newmatilda.com/2010/12/01/clocks-ticking#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 02:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Matilda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media death watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=190339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online commentary and opinion website <em>New Matilda</em> has only two weeks left of its fund-raising drive, otherwise it's the end for the publication. Perhaps if some more $20,000 donations appear, it'll stay open...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newmatilda.com/2010/12/01/clocks-ticking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to succeed in new media</title>
		<link>http://tjd.posterous.com/a-masterclass-in-new-media</link>
		<comments>http://tjd.posterous.com/a-masterclass-in-new-media#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traditional blogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=189919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Gawker</em> founder Nick Denton is currently in the process of redesigning his websites, ditching the traditional basic blog structure in favour of formats more conducive to images and video. <b>Tim Dunlop</b> presents his mini masterclass in new media tools and tips.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tjd.posterous.com/a-masterclass-in-new-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Scott: Journalism&#8217;s Golden Era</title>
		<link>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/11/25/3075798.htm?site=thedrum</link>
		<comments>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/11/25/3075798.htm?site=thedrum#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 01:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=188566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of journos like to harp on about the old days of journalism, when deadlines were few and money was plentiful. But, says ABC managing director <b>Mark Scott</b>, journalism today is a more democratic, in-depth and thrilling affair than the days of yore.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/11/25/3075798.htm?site=thedrum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Psst, Google TV: TV is about making money</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/whitenoise/2010/11/12/psst-google-tv-tv-is-about-making-money/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/whitenoise/2010/11/12/psst-google-tv-tv-is-about-making-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 23:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film & TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV & Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boxee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=185212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did Google really believe that the US TV networks would allow them to re-distribute their content through the Google TV service? Pretty naive of them if that is the case, says <b>Dan Barrett</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/whitenoise/2010/11/12/psst-google-tv-tv-is-about-making-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New New Matilda has lift-off</title>
		<link>http://newmatilda.com/2010/10/22/and-were-off</link>
		<comments>http://newmatilda.com/2010/10/22/and-were-off#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 01:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Matilda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscription models]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=180302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's the re-launch of online commentary website <a href="http://newmatilda.com/"><em>New Matilda</em></a>! Back up and publishing every day until Christmas, to see if the publication can prove financially viable. It's going for a community radio station subscriber model, rather than paywalls.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newmatilda.com/2010/10/22/and-were-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online news: the Year of the Dwarf Penis</title>
		<link>http://wheelercentre.com/dailies/post/45a0d21b9dda/</link>
		<comments>http://wheelercentre.com/dailies/post/45a0d21b9dda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sophie black]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=179056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Internet journalism isn't just sex, gore and photoshopped galleries of celebrities as fruit. Think of the Iran protests and the WikiLeaks Collateral Murder video, says <em>Crikey</em> editor <b>Sophie Black</b>, in a defence of online news. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://wheelercentre.com/dailies/post/45a0d21b9dda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crimes in 140 characters or less</title>
		<link>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/shanerichmond/100005881/police-take-to-twitter-to-show-how-hard-theyre-working/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/shanerichmond/100005881/police-take-to-twitter-to-show-how-hard-theyre-working/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greater Manchester Police Station]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=178534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To prove that policing isn't just about car chases and gang fights, the Greater Manchester Police Station tweeted every single incident that got called in. It's a fascinating look at the busy-but-banal look at policing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/shanerichmond/100005881/police-take-to-twitter-to-show-how-hard-theyre-working/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HuffPo makes moolah</title>
		<link>http://gawker.com/5658561/the-huffington-post-is-finally-profitable</link>
		<comments>http://gawker.com/5658561/the-huffington-post-is-finally-profitable#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 02:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arianna Huffington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=177321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It might not pay any of its contributors -- well a few journalists, but not its opinion articles -- but popular news website <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/"><em>Huffington Post</em></a> is now making a profit. It's traffic is up 80% this year.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/5658561/the-huffington-post-is-finally-profitable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The new New Matilda</title>
		<link>http://newmatilda.com/2010/10/08/did-you-miss-us-new-matilda-way-back</link>
		<comments>http://newmatilda.com/2010/10/08/did-you-miss-us-new-matilda-way-back#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 23:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Matilda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=177220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online commentary website <em>New Matilda</em> is reopening its virtual doors once more, after a <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/27/breaking-new-matilda-to-fold/">well-publicised closure</a> in June. It'll return as a paid subscriber site, and expects to be back to full publishing capacity in 2011.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newmatilda.com/2010/10/08/did-you-miss-us-new-matilda-way-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The differences between public servants and journalists</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2010/10/05/information-brokerage-and-citizenship-more-reflections-on-grogs-gamut/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2010/10/05/information-brokerage-and-citizenship-more-reflections-on-grogs-gamut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 23:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grog's Gamut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public servants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=176539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The controversy over the outing of the blogger Grog's Gamut has now passed out of the hands of newspapers and the blogosphere and on to the desk of senior public servants, who have some interesting questions to wrestle with, writes <b>Margaret Simons</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2010/10/05/information-brokerage-and-citizenship-more-reflections-on-grogs-gamut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The journo who wrote a 1000 word story on Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/journo_writes_1000_word_story_on_twitter_after_med.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/journo_writes_1000_word_story_on_twitter_after_med.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 02:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=170048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Ford was forced to pay US$131 million damages after an Explorer rolled and killed a young man, no news services picked up the story. So writer <b>Adam Penenberg</b> took to Twitter.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/journo_writes_1000_word_story_on_twitter_after_med.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1588/1842 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-11 23:53:48 -->
