<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; neil chenoweth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/neil-chenoweth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Did Murdoch give $8 million to a notorious hacker?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/19/did-murdoch-give-8-million-to-a-notorious-hacker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/19/did-murdoch-give-8-million-to-a-notorious-hacker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global media empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infamous hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neil chenoweth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirate cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The $US1 billion EchoStar writ against News Corp’s NDS division throws up a host of corporate governance questions, writes <b>Stephen Mayne</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/19/did-murdoch-give-8-million-to-a-notorious-hacker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How far would Rupert Murdoch go to hurt his rivals?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/15/how-far-would-rupert-murdoch-go-to-hurt-his-rivals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/15/how-far-would-rupert-murdoch-go-to-hurt-his-rivals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian hacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie ergen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nds security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neil chenoweth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch has a reputation for being incredibly brutal on his business opponents. Whether it be attempts to buy them, savage price wars or ferocious attacks in his media outlets, you don’t compete with the Sun King without being traumatised by the experience, writes <b>Stephen Mayne</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/02/15/how-far-would-rupert-murdoch-go-to-hurt-his-rivals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rupert drops to 10%, imposes kids on shareholders</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/10/rupert-drops-to-10-imposes-kids-on-shareholders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/10/rupert-drops-to-10-imposes-kids-on-shareholders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lachlan Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neil chenoweth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sir keith murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been a truckload of commentary in the non-Murdoch press about James Murdoch’s ascension to the third most senior position at News Corporation, but one little explored angle is the role of Lachlan Murdoch and Australia, writes Stephen Mayne.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/10/rupert-drops-to-10-imposes-kids-on-shareholders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Errington: Communications policy requires more attention</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/24/errington-communications-policy-requires-more-attention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/24/errington-communications-policy-requires-more-attention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communications policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media moguls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neil chenoweth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television licences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Communications policy under the present government has been nothing short of diabolical. Communication is vital to a healthy democracy, yet media and telecommunications policies rarely gets a look-in during an election campaign, writes Wayne Errington.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/24/errington-communications-policy-requires-more-attention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 577/632 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 04:51:14 -->
