<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; medical journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/medical-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How researchers and journals fail their audiences: not disclosing conflicts</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/22/how-researchers-and-journals-fail-their-audiences-not-disclosing-conflicts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/22/how-researchers-and-journals-fail-their-audiences-not-disclosing-conflicts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 03:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=173610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beginning in 2013, the law requires pharmaceutical and device companies to disclose payments (including those made in kind) to doctors, writes Dr Lesley Russell, the Menzies Foundation Fellow at the Menzies  Center for Health Policy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/22/how-researchers-and-journals-fail-their-audiences-not-disclosing-conflicts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spinning the Media: Spin doctors have plenty to say in health reporting</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/17/spinning-the-media-spin-doctors-have-plenty-to-say-in-health-reporting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/17/spinning-the-media-spin-doctors-have-plenty-to-say-in-health-reporting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big pharma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health reporters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spinning the Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=123927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to health reporting, the relationship between journalists and public relations people could be in need of a check-up, writes <b>Flint Duxfield</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/17/spinning-the-media-spin-doctors-have-plenty-to-say-in-health-reporting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homebirth saga turns the tables on medical journals</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/02/homebirth-saga-turns-the-tables-on-medical-journals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/02/homebirth-saga-turns-the-tables-on-medical-journals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 02:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home births]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Journal of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=120072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The very publications that publish critiques of health journalism -- medical journals -- are coming under fire for their own contributions to journalism that misleads and misinforms, writes <b>Melissa Sweet</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/02/homebirth-saga-turns-the-tables-on-medical-journals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reflections from the retiring editor of the Medical Journal of Australia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2010/02/02/reflections-from-the-retiring-editor-of-the-medical-journal-of-australia/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2010/02/02/reflections-from-the-retiring-editor-of-the-medical-journal-of-australia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Sweet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Van Der Weyden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Journal of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=113806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After many years at the helm of the <em>Medical Journal of Australia</em>, Dr Martin Van Der Weyden is retiring. He shares reflections on life in the hot seat with <b>Melissa Sweet</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2010/02/02/reflections-from-the-retiring-editor-of-the-medical-journal-of-australia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Pharma pushing the pens on medical literature</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/05/health/research/05ghost.html?_r=1&#038;hp</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/05/health/research/05ghost.html?_r=1&#038;hp#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 00:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ghostwriters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hormone replacement therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=78379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newly revealed court papers show that pharmaceutical companies paid ghostwriters to contribute to 26 papers published in medical journals supporting hormone replacement therapy, which was subsequently found to increase the risk of heart disease, cancer and dementia.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/05/health/research/05ghost.html?_r=1&#038;hp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HuffPo&#8216;s unhealthy quackery</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/env/vital_signs/2009/07/30/huffington_post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/env/vital_signs/2009/07/30/huffington_post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arianna Huffington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complementary and alternative medicines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health reporters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=77230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pay peanuts... It's one thing for <em>The Huffington Post</em>'s army of unpaid bloggers to pontificate on politics, but when it comes to science and medicine, it's just irresponsible to publish the crackpot theories of unqualified, self-appointed "experts" says doctor <b>Rahul K. Parikh</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/env/vital_signs/2009/07/30/huffington_post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media failing to report medical conflicts of interest</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/07/media-failing-to-report-medical-conflicts-of-interest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/07/media-failing-to-report-medical-conflicts-of-interest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bias in the news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too many medical stories look more like promotion than journalism- and have been driven by the powerful marketing machinery of one of the most profitable industries on the planet, writes <b>Roy Moynihan</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/07/media-failing-to-report-medical-conflicts-of-interest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ties that bind: how big pharma buys a good press</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/19/the-ties-that-bind-how-big-pharma-buys-a-good-press/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/19/the-ties-that-bind-how-big-pharma-buys-a-good-press/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health organisations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicines Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pfizer australia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While efforts are underway in Australia and elsewhere to disentangle the ties between doctors and drug companies (as reported in Crikey yesterday), the spotlight should also be illuminating another influential profession’s conflicts of interest.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/19/the-ties-that-bind-how-big-pharma-buys-a-good-press/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 770/869 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 10:33:30 -->
