<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; media freedom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/media-freedom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Media freedom hampered by media irresponsibility</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/05/media-freedom-hampered-by-media-irresponsibility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/05/media-freedom-hampered-by-media-irresponsibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent Commission Against Corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An audit of the freedom of information available to the Australian media, released today, makes a powerful argument that free speech in Australia is being subtly whittled away, writes Denis Muller. 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/05/media-freedom-hampered-by-media-irresponsibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media freedom: Where do Liberal and Labor stand?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/23/media-freedom-where-do-liberal-and-labor-stand/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/23/media-freedom-where-do-liberal-and-labor-stand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Law Reform Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media freedom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Prime Minister has hinted that during the campaign he will release a couple of modest reforms in order to free up restrictions on journalists and increase the public’s access to information. So what would the Coalition need to do to match what the ALP is now touting as policy? Andrew Dodd reports.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/23/media-freedom-where-do-liberal-and-labor-stand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The West takes the public for fools over public interest</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/25/the-west-takes-the-public-for-fools-over-public-interest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/25/the-west-takes-the-public-for-fools-over-public-interest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[this means that]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[west australian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<i>The West Australian</i> got fundamental facts wrong in a story about the hospital system and refused to correct. Their defence? You guessed it – writing stories about inadequate health services is in the "public interest" and this means that the errors "were immaterial to the issue", writes Margaret Simons.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/25/the-west-takes-the-public-for-fools-over-public-interest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
