<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; media ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/media-ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NYT debate: what would it cost to end he-said-she-said journalism?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/01/13/what-would-it-cost-to-end-he-said-she-said-journalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/01/13/what-would-it-cost-to-end-he-said-she-said-journalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 01:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[churnalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jay rosen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=268397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>The New York Times</em> has raised the issue of he-said-she-said journalism. It should be discussed here, too, but it's more complicated than media critics think.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/01/13/what-would-it-cost-to-end-he-said-she-said-journalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The really dangerous idea &#8212; it&#8217;s all the media&#8217;s fault</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/03/the-really-dangerous-idea-its-all-the-medias-fault/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/03/the-really-dangerous-idea-its-all-the-medias-fault/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Festival of Dangerous Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=250529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of all the dangerous ideas raised at the Festival of Dangerous Ideas in Sydney over the weekend, the organisers seemed to miss one pertinent topic: is the media to blame for everything that’s wrong with our society?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/03/the-really-dangerous-idea-its-all-the-medias-fault/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A media inquiry sparks a media debate</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/15/a-media-inquiry-sparks-a-media-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/15/a-media-inquiry-sparks-a-media-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 23:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amber Jamieson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Press Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Ricketson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Finkelstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=247022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Crikey media wrap</b>: An independent inquiry will examine print and online media, focusing on ethics, regulation and the Australian Press Council, announced Communications Minister Stephen Conroy yesterday.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/15/a-media-inquiry-sparks-a-media-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simons: another lesson in the importance of a code of conduct</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/22/simons-another-lesson-in-the-importance-of-a-code-of-conduct/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/22/simons-another-lesson-in-the-importance-of-a-code-of-conduct/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 03:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code of conduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=242422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No media organisation can regard itself as having covered off on ethics merely by proclaiming that it follows a code – no matter how good that code might be.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/22/simons-another-lesson-in-the-importance-of-a-code-of-conduct/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hunger for a story v right to privacy: can the media balance both?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/06/hunger-for-a-story-v-right-to-privacy-can-the-media-balance-both/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/06/hunger-for-a-story-v-right-to-privacy-can-the-media-balance-both/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 03:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australian journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hartigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Keating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to know coalition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=161809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Am I wrong in thinking that there is a change coming in attitudes to the thing that so many in the community regard as an oxymoron: journalism ethics? Paul Keating offered an unassailable argument for sensible privacy legislation.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/06/hunger-for-a-story-v-right-to-privacy-can-the-media-balance-both/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How PepsiCo met its blogosphere match</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/09/how-pepsico-met-its-blogosphere-match/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/09/how-pepsico-met-its-blogosphere-match/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 03:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pepsi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=151932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An internationally respected science blogging network has canned plans for a PepsiCo-sponsored blog. The fracas has focused attention on the financial constraints and ethics of new media and raises questions for public health advocates, writes <b>Melissa Sweet</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/09/how-pepsico-met-its-blogosphere-match/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Journalists are overly precious</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/idealab/2010/06/why-cant-journalists-handle-public-criticism167.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.pbs.org/idealab/2010/06/why-cant-journalists-handle-public-criticism167.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 07:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public critcism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=147664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many professions face public criticism, yet journalists seem to take personal offence when their own work is called into question. How can they dish it daily but not take it themselves?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pbs.org/idealab/2010/06/why-cant-journalists-handle-public-criticism167.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holmes: Getting to the source of it</title>
		<link>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/06/10/2923369.htm?site=thedrum</link>
		<comments>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/06/10/2923369.htm?site=thedrum#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists' code of ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists' sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=145233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Jonathan Holmes</b> tells the story of his trip to Argentina in 1978 to report on government's killings and kidnappings. A key witness appeared, but who could guarantee a source's safety?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/06/10/2923369.htm?site=thedrum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beecher: Tabloid media laughing all the way to the pub on Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/24/beecher-tabloid-media-laughing-all-the-way-to-the-pub-on-campbell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/24/beecher-tabloid-media-laughing-all-the-way-to-the-pub-on-campbell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 03:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Beecher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV & Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ken's of kensington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tabloid journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=140712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest "debate" about media and privacy, triggered by last week's television expose of NSW Minister David Campbell leaving a gay club, is a sham conducted by people who are paid extremely well to legitimise something that is nasty and indefensible.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/24/beecher-tabloid-media-laughing-all-the-way-to-the-pub-on-campbell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was The Age right to sack Deveny?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2010/05/05/fairfax-vs-deveny-gutless-paper-bends-in-the-wind/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2010/05/05/fairfax-vs-deveny-gutless-paper-bends-in-the-wind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 22:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catherine deveny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairfax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Age]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=135662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>The Age</em>'s sacking of outspoken columnist Catherine Deveny for remarks she made about the Logies on her personal Twitter feed over the weekend is gutless, says <b>Jeremy Sear</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2010/05/05/fairfax-vs-deveny-gutless-paper-bends-in-the-wind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Killing the ETS was a team effort</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/28/its-all-your-fault-killing-the-ets-was-a-team-effort/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/28/its-all-your-fault-killing-the-ets-was-a-team-effort/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 03:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ETS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=133755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rudd and Wong can't take all the credit for killing the ETS: every news outlet that ran dodgy polluter-commissioned modelling and op-eds from climate denialists and wingnuts can also take a bow.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/28/its-all-your-fault-killing-the-ets-was-a-team-effort/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How many news photographers are too many?</title>
		<link>http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/essay-13/</link>
		<comments>http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/essay-13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photojournalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=114852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News photographers naturally descend on disaster areas and conflict zones like moths to a flame. But do we really need hundreds of images of the same tragedy? Some of the world's top photojournalists weigh in.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/essay-13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Newspoll numbers The Australian won&#8217;t print</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/10/the-newspoll-numbers-the-australian-wont-print/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/10/the-newspoll-numbers-the-australian-wont-print/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspoll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollsters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Australian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/10/the-newspoll-numbers-the-australian-wont-print/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>The Australian</em> appears to have decided to not publish the results of an opinion poll on voting intention in the wake of last week's outlier that had Malcolm Turnbull gaining ground on Kevin Rudd.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/10/the-newspoll-numbers-the-australian-wont-print/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News Ltd blurs the line between ads and editorial</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/ads-and-editorial-move-closer-at-news-ltd-11382</link>
		<comments>http://mumbrella.com.au/ads-and-editorial-move-closer-at-news-ltd-11382#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Limited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Magazines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=98075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several News Ltd publications are treading a very thin line between advertising and editorial by offering special product spruiks for high-paying advertisers -- including an endorsement from the editor themselves. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mumbrella.com.au/ads-and-editorial-move-closer-at-news-ltd-11382/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Provoking public figures for publicity</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2009/11/02/katherine-keating-and-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2009/11/02/katherine-keating-and-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katherine Keating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=96723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <em>Tele</em>'s Katherine Keating <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/02/keating-on-the-stairs-beating-or-beat-up/">story</a> is part of an old media game, says <b>Margaret Simons</b>: provoke a public figure, then make their reaction the news]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2009/11/02/katherine-keating-and-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keating on the stairs: beating or beat up?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/02/keating-on-the-stairs-beating-or-beat-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/02/keating-on-the-stairs-beating-or-beat-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[absolut vodka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katherine Keating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Keating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday Telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/02/keating-on-the-stairs-beating-or-beat-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Insiders say a <em>Sunday Telegraph</em> <a href="http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/sunday-telegraph/katherine-keatings-threat-to-kill-photographer/story-e6frewt0-1225793126733">alleging</a> Paul Keating's daughter kicked and threatened to kill one of its photographers was at best a beat-up, and at-worst a total fabrication.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/02/keating-on-the-stairs-beating-or-beat-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which high-profile war correspondent is also a spy?</title>
		<link>http://gawker.com/5389610/which-high+profile-war-correspondent-is-a-spy</link>
		<comments>http://gawker.com/5389610/which-high+profile-war-correspondent-is-a-spy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embedded journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secret agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war correspondents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=95307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three anonymous military sources have separately claimed that a high-profile journalist currently working in a war zone is also a secret agent, according to <em>Gawker</em>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/5389610/which-high+profile-war-correspondent-is-a-spy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No neutral territory between Mike Rann and the media</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/07/crikey-says-102/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/07/crikey-says-102/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Rann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/07/crikey-says-102/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The murky controversy surrounding SA premier Mike Rann is now a public, not a private, matter. The demilitarised zone between Rann, the media and the voters has been well and truly breached.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/07/crikey-says-102/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feasting on the fresh corpse of Gourmet mag</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/eater-com-binges-on-the-corpse-of-gourmet/#more-31715</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/eater-com-binges-on-the-corpse-of-gourmet/#more-31715#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gourmet magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=91463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's only been two days since the closure of <em>Gourmet</em> magazine was announced, and the vultures are already circling: food blog <em><a href="http://eater.com">Eater</a></em> is <a href="http://eater.com/archives/2009/10/05/wanted-unpublished-gourmet-features.php">offering</a> to pay the mag's now-former writers $100 a pop for any unpublished features. Genius.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/eater-com-binges-on-the-corpse-of-gourmet/#more-31715/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For the West it&#8217;s no story without Stokes</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/06/for-the-west-its-no-story-without-stokes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/06/for-the-west-its-no-story-without-stokes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kerry Stokes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The West Australian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woodside Petroleum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/06/for-the-west-its-no-story-without-stokes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can't keep a good media proprietor down, writes Perth paper watcher <b>Skink</b>. Kerry Stokes has been gracious enough to appear in his own TV studio, and on the front page of his own paper.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/06/for-the-west-its-no-story-without-stokes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who mops up when news sources leak?</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/27/AR2009092703270.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/27/AR2009092703270.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 02:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=89610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been a veritable downpour of <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/leaked/">leaks</a> in the press lately -- <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/20/AR2009092002920.html">McCrystal</a>, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/davidgregory/2009/09/leaking_moon_water_is_all_twit.html">NASA</a>, <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2009/09/clinton-gore-i-thought-he-was-neverland">Clinton</a> and more -- but are journos too eager to catch a scoop without questioning (or divulging) who is offering it and why?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/27/AR2009092703270.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter&#8217;s unethical, according to the AFR&#8217;s new code</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/twitters-unethical-according-to-the-afrs-new-code/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/twitters-unethical-according-to-the-afrs-new-code/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Financial Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/twitters-unethical-according-to-the-afrs-new-code/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Staff at the <i>Australian Financial Review </i>are being asked to sign up to an ethics policy under which they could be disciplined -- even sacked -- for taking part in political debates.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/18/twitters-unethical-according-to-the-afrs-new-code/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LEAKED: How the US press became Blago&#8217;s best friend</title>
		<link>http://gawker.com/5352097/exclusive-how-the-press-pandered-to-blagojevich-after-his-arrest</link>
		<comments>http://gawker.com/5352097/exclusive-how-the-press-pandered-to-blagojevich-after-his-arrest#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rod blagojevich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=84571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After he was arrested for corruption last year, former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich took a hammering in the US press as a dodgy slimeball. But behind the scenes, emails leaked to <em>Gawker</em> reveal the press-pack engaged in some serious brown-nosing to score an interview.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/5352097/exclusive-how-the-press-pandered-to-blagojevich-after-his-arrest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Censorship and cowardice at Conde Nast</title>
		<link>http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112530364</link>
		<comments>http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112530364#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 17:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KGB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vladimir putin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=84430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Publisher Conde Nast has buried a story from <em>GQ</em> on possible connections between Vladimir Putin, the KGB and a series of 1999 bombings officially blamed on Chechen terrorists, keeping the piece off the web and out of Russia, for fear of reprisals. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112530364/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was the AP right to publish a soldier&#8217;s dying hours?</title>
		<link>http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/04/behind-13/?hp</link>
		<comments>http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/04/behind-13/?hp#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 17:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photojournalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Armed Forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war reporting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=84420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The AP has come under some <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/26759.html">heavy fire</a> for publishing a photo of a deceased US soldier shortly after he was fatally wounded by a grenade in Afghanistan. <em>The NYT</em>'s <em>Lens</em> blog looks at the ethics and precedent of going public with such a private moment.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/04/behind-13/?hp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1656/1925 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 03:46:49 -->
