<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; media death watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/media-death-watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Matilda farewells its readers&#8230;for now</title>
		<link>http://newmatilda.com/2010/06/25/you-dont-know-what-youve-got-till-its-gone</link>
		<comments>http://newmatilda.com/2010/06/25/you-dont-know-what-youve-got-till-its-gone#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Matilda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=149060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>New Matilda</em> editor <b>Marni Cordell</b> pens a farewell letter to readers as <em>New Matilda</em> published its final edition on Friday. But this isn't the end of the <em>New Matilda</em> site...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newmatilda.com/2010/06/25/you-dont-know-what-youve-got-till-its-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No new New Matilda&#8230;yet</title>
		<link>http://newmatilda.com/2010/06/10/newmatilda-still-waving-goodbye</link>
		<comments>http://newmatilda.com/2010/06/10/newmatilda-still-waving-goodbye#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 01:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of the media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Matilda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscription models]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=145163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>New Matilda</em> editor <b>Marni Cordell</b> discusses the precarious future of the website: yes, it is still closing, unless a knight in shining armour appears very, very soon. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newmatilda.com/2010/06/10/newmatilda-still-waving-goodbye/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RIP Ralph, where lads used to learn a thing or two</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/06/07/rip-ralph-where-lads-used-to-learn-a-thing-or-two/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/06/07/rip-ralph-where-lads-used-to-learn-a-thing-or-two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 03:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACP Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Dapin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=144166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A by-word for B-grade celebrities in bikinis and coarse blokey humour, <i>Ralph</i> magazine breathed its last VB-scented breath last week. Former writer <b>Jason Mountney</b> remembers when it was good.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/06/07/rip-ralph-where-lads-used-to-learn-a-thing-or-two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What next for the Aussie blogosphere?</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2010/05/27/new-matilda-to-fold-what-comes-next/</link>
		<comments>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2010/05/27/new-matilda-to-fold-what-comes-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 03:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Matilda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=141871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/27/breaking-new-matilda-to-fold/">news</a> that <em>New Matilda</em> is folding, the tiny Aussie political blogosphere has shrunk even further. Replicating the magazine model online just doesn't work, says <b>Mark Bahnisch</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2010/05/27/new-matilda-to-fold-what-comes-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New media death watch: New Matilda to fold</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/27/breaking-new-matilda-to-fold/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/27/breaking-new-matilda-to-fold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 22:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Matilda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=141610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australian online comment website <em>New Matilda</em> is preparing shut its virtual doors, after funding for the venture dried up.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/27/breaking-new-matilda-to-fold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can newspapers afford to snub theatre-goers?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/curtaincall/2010/05/17/can-newspapers-afford-to-snub-theatre-goers/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/curtaincall/2010/05/17/can-newspapers-afford-to-snub-theatre-goers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 06:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arts journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herald Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun Herald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=139165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <em>Sun Herald</em> has followed the lead of the <em>Herald Sun</em> in dropping theatre and arts coverage. But as newspaper readers and revenues dry up, can they really afford to marginalise the large arts-loving audience? asks <b>Jason Whittaker</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/curtaincall/2010/05/17/can-newspapers-afford-to-snub-theatre-goers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s not that Newsweek is bad &#8212; it&#8217;s that TIME is better</title>
		<link>http://blogs.hbr.org/hbr/hbreditors/2010/05/newsweeks_decline_why_companies_need_rivals.html</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.hbr.org/hbr/hbreditors/2010/05/newsweeks_decline_why_companies_need_rivals.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=137273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ailing newsweekly <em>Newsweek</em>'s biggest problem is that it's coming second in a two-horse-race with <em>TIME</em> magazine, says <b>Dan McGinn</b>. Both rags would actually be better off with <em>more</em> competitors.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.hbr.org/hbr/hbreditors/2010/05/newsweeks_decline_why_companies_need_rivals.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For Sale: Newsweek</title>
		<link>http://www.newsweek.com/id/237401</link>
		<comments>http://www.newsweek.com/id/237401#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 01:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=136123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Newsweek</em> magazine is on the market. Sure, it's had "losses in the tens of millions for the last two years", but 1.5 million subscribers should count for something. Any bidders?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newsweek.com/id/237401/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the iPad can&#8217;t save the magazine industry</title>
		<link>http://www.tbiresearch.com/here-is-why-the-ipad-wont-save-the-magazine-industry-2010-3</link>
		<comments>http://www.tbiresearch.com/here-is-why-the-ipad-wont-save-the-magazine-industry-2010-3#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 01:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=128159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Business Insider</em> crunches the numbers on the iPad economy: even if iPads sell beyond all expectations, the return for magazines will just be small change compared to their print revenue. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tbiresearch.com/here-is-why-the-ipad-wont-save-the-magazine-industry-2010-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lonely Planet lays off website team, promises new roles</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/26/lonely-planet-lays-off-website-team-promises-new-roles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/26/lonely-planet-lays-off-website-team-promises-new-roles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 02:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lonely planet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tony wheeler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=126419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The axe has fallen on guide book behemoth Lonely Planet's entire team of website writers, with eight roles made redundant at the whim of the company's BBC management team.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/26/lonely-planet-lays-off-website-team-promises-new-roles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MySpace goes into meltdown</title>
		<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/03/16/myspace-employees-speak-their-mind-lots-of-yelling-going-on-apparently/</link>
		<comments>http://techcrunch.com/2010/03/16/myspace-employees-speak-their-mind-lots-of-yelling-going-on-apparently/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Hirschhorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=123826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anonymous MySpace employees are flooding <em>TechCrunch</em> with tales of how the once-cool company is crumbling: "idiots are running the company into the ground" says one disgruntled staffer.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://techcrunch.com/2010/03/16/myspace-employees-speak-their-mind-lots-of-yelling-going-on-apparently/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear journalists: stop working for free</title>
		<link>http://newsosaur.blogspot.com/2010/02/stop-exploitation-of-journalists.html</link>
		<comments>http://newsosaur.blogspot.com/2010/02/stop-exploitation-of-journalists.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=113834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journalists are just speeding up their own demise by doing unpaid or underpaid work, says media veteran <b>Alan Mutter</b> in a call-out for all writers to stop working for free.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newsosaur.blogspot.com/2010/02/stop-exploitation-of-journalists.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who will survive the great NYT blog cull?</title>
		<link>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/times-staff-shrinks-blogs-will-be-pruned</link>
		<comments>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/times-staff-shrinks-blogs-will-be-pruned#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=103632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>The New York Times</em> is planning to prune back some of its 70+ blogs from its site in an effort to save some cash. Which will be voted off the island? The <a href="http://wordplay.blogs.nytimes.com/">crossword blog</a>? The <a href="http://slapshot.blogs.nytimes.com">ice hockey blog</a>? Or the <a href="http://newoldage.blogs.nytimes.com/">old person blog</a>?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/times-staff-shrinks-blogs-will-be-pruned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The axe drops at the Associated Press</title>
		<link>http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/17/layoffs-begin-at-associated-press/</link>
		<comments>http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/17/layoffs-begin-at-associated-press/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job losses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=99586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heads have begun to roll at US-based newswire service the <em>Associated Press</em>, as the agency attempts to cut its costs by 10%. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/17/layoffs-begin-at-associated-press/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National newspapers fall off a cliff, bury news</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/16/national-newspapers-fall-off-a-cliff-bury-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/16/national-newspapers-fall-off-a-cliff-bury-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Dyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Financial Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper readership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Australian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/16/national-newspapers-fall-off-a-cliff-bury-news/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australian newspaper buyers have punished the national papers, <em>The Australian Financial Review</em> and <em>The Australian</em> in the latest audit period, but basically spared the rod on their state-based competitors.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/16/national-newspapers-fall-off-a-cliff-bury-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The axe is about to fall at Newsweek</title>
		<link>http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/1109/Layoffs_at_Newsweek.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/1109/Layoffs_at_Newsweek.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job losses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=98785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Politico</em> has its hands on an internal memo from <em>Newsweek</em> editor, Jon Meacham, informing staff that about a dozen job are about to be cut.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/1109/Layoffs_at_Newsweek.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why you should never piss-off a sub-editor</title>
		<link>http://torontoist.com/2009/11/disgruntled_star_editor_takes_revenge.php</link>
		<comments>http://torontoist.com/2009/11/disgruntled_star_editor_takes_revenge.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job losses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subeditors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=98338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newspaper <em>The Toronto Star</em> recently announced it would be outsourcing some of its sub-editing work. So the paper's disgruntled subbies have taken a red pen to the publisher's internal memo announcing the move, proving <em>exactly</em> why they're needed. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://torontoist.com/2009/11/disgruntled_star_editor_takes_revenge.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Time Inc. carnage begins</title>
		<link>http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/pressed/2009/11/04/Time-warner-released-third-quarter-layoffs-begin-at-time-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/pressed/2009/11/04/Time-warner-released-third-quarter-layoffs-begin-at-time-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job losses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Inc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=97392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/time-inc-to-cut-100-million-extensive-layoffs-are-expected/">Forced to cut</a> $100m in expenditure, publisher Time has begun trimming the fat, announcing layoffs at <em>Sports Illustrated</em> and the closure of Fortune Small Business. And this is just round one: 280 layoffs are expected in total.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.portfolio.com/views/blogs/pressed/2009/11/04/Time-warner-released-third-quarter-layoffs-begin-at-time-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The last days of Gourmet</title>
		<link>http://www.lastdaysofgourmet.com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lastdaysofgourmet.com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gourmet magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo galleries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=97154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former associate art director of the now-defunct <em>Gourmet</em> magazine has put up this online photo gallery to document the final days in the publication's now-empty offices. How thoroughly depressing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lastdaysofgourmet.com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why a Tory victory is just what Rupert wants</title>
		<link>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8313694.stm</link>
		<comments>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8313694.stm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV & Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=94031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Conservative Party gain power in the UK, they will "rip up" the BBC's royal charter, deregulating the TV industry to improve the market for commercial operators, according to the party's shadow culture secretary.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8313694.stm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Wired survive the Condé carnage?</title>
		<link>http://gawker.com/5382805/unwiring-wired</link>
		<comments>http://gawker.com/5382805/unwiring-wired#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=93346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Gawker</em> assesses the shaky future of tech-bible <em>Wired</em>. Faced with sinking ad sales, major staff cuts and losses, and at the mercy of <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/conde-nast/">an ailing publisher</a>, how much longer can the mag and its website cling on?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/5382805/unwiring-wired/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cost-cutting carnage at Condé Nast: four mags to fold</title>
		<link>http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/conde-nast-to-close-gourmet-magazine/</link>
		<comments>http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/conde-nast-to-close-gourmet-magazine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost cutting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gourmet magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=91173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Publisher <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/business/media/28conde.html?_r=1">Condé Nast</a> (<em>GQ</em>, <em>Vogue</em>, <em>Vanity Fair</em>) is trimming the fat of <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/business/media/28conde.html">bloated</a> magazine empire, and the first victims are <em>Cookie</em>, <em>Modern Bride</em>, <em>Elegant Bride</em> and, most notably, foodie bible <em>Gourmet</em>. The latter's closure has <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=aRzYK_GptIcw">been labeled</a> "an American tragedy". But <a href="http://food.theatlantic.com/corbys-fresh-feeds/dont-rip-gourmet-come-back-soon.php">is this really the end</a>?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/conde-nast-to-close-gourmet-magazine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great moments in journalism: America&#8217;s Next Top Pundit</title>
		<link>http://gawker.com/5370214/the-washington-post-launches-americas-next-top-pundit</link>
		<comments>http://gawker.com/5370214/the-washington-post-launches-americas-next-top-pundit#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America's Next Great Pundit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=90046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>The Washington Post</em> is <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/opinions/pundit-contest/index.html">running a contest</a> to find "America's Next Great Pundit". Contestants will face-off in a series of challenges, judged by <em>Post</em> staff, and readers will vote on who wins a coveted byline with the paper. No matter who wins, journalism is the loser. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/5370214/the-washington-post-launches-americas-next-top-pundit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conde Nast tightens its (hand-made, designer, anaconda leather) belt</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/business/media/28conde.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/business/media/28conde.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost cutting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanity Fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vogue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=89587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Publisher Conde Nast (<em>GQ</em>, <em>Vogue</em>, <em>Vanity Fair</em>) <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1996/06/16/magazine/the-big-city-masochism-central.html">is well known</a> for its <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2210367">culture</a> of extravagance and indulgence -- but even Anna Wintour isn't immune to the media downturn, and the time has come to cut some costs. Can Conde keep the class without chauffeurs and caviar?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/business/media/28conde.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Content isn&#8217;t king, growth isn&#8217;t always good: busting the media&#8217;s big myths</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200910/moguls</link>
		<comments>http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200910/moguls#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 04:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media moguls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper death watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=89324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newsflash, media moguls: your problems started well before the internet, say the authors of new book <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=1591842646">The Curse of the Mogul</a></em>. A look at four big misconceptions that have been hurting the media industry far longer than the web.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200910/moguls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1625/1848 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 01:02:20 -->
