<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; media convergence review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/media-convergence-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:12:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How do we defend editorial integrity in the post-industrial age?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/06/26/how-do-we-defend-editorial-integrity-in-the-post-industrial-age/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/06/26/how-do-we-defend-editorial-integrity-in-the-post-industrial-age/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 03:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairfax media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finkelstein media inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gina Rinehart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media convergence review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper death watch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=298826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The situation of Fairfax Media, with three editors standing down in one day, make this a good time to think carefully about what journalists mean by editorial independence.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/06/26/how-do-we-defend-editorial-integrity-in-the-post-industrial-age/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idiot&#8217;s Guide to the Convergence Review: that&#8217;s a wrap</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/11/idiots-guide-to-the-convergence-review-thats-a-wrap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/11/idiots-guide-to-the-convergence-review-thats-a-wrap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 03:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Dodd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glen boreham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media convergence review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=290296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A week after the release of the Convergence Review, its principal author, Glen Boreham launched into an opinion piece.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/11/idiots-guide-to-the-convergence-review-thats-a-wrap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idiot&#8217;s Guide to the Convergence Review: content standards</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/04/idiots-guide-to-the-convergence-review-new-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/04/idiots-guide-to-the-convergence-review-new-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 03:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finkelstein media inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media convergence review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=288741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How does the Convergence Review balance its deregulatory vibe with its assertion that content standards are still necessary, because the community expects them and because failing to restrict access to some content can do harm?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/04/idiots-guide-to-the-convergence-review-new-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idiot&#8217;s Guide to the Convergence Review: content competition</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/03/idiots-guide-to-the-convergence-review-content-competition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/03/idiots-guide-to-the-convergence-review-content-competition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 03:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Dodd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media convergence review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=288478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to convergence, it’s clear that content is king.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/03/idiots-guide-to-the-convergence-review-content-competition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idiot&#8217;s Guide to Convergence Review: media ownership and diversity</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/02/idiots-guide-to-convergence-review-media-ownership-and-diversity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/02/idiots-guide-to-convergence-review-media-ownership-and-diversity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 03:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convergence review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media convergence review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ownership]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=288185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The current model of media ownership regulation has failed to protect our media diversity -- but will the Convergence Review's proposal work better?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/02/idiots-guide-to-convergence-review-media-ownership-and-diversity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Convergence Review proposals as useful as an ashtray on a motorbike</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/02/convergence-review-proposals-as-useful-as-an-ashtray-on-a-motorbike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/02/convergence-review-proposals-as-useful-as-an-ashtray-on-a-motorbike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 03:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convergence review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media convergence review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=288168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["You can judge the quality of a cake from any slice," says <b>David Salter</b> as he examines one juicy morsel from the Convegence Review's final report.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/02/convergence-review-proposals-as-useful-as-an-ashtray-on-a-motorbike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simons: review says Finkelstein got regs diagnosis right, prescription wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/01/simons-review-says-finkelstein-got-regs-diagnosis-right-prescription-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/01/simons-review-says-finkelstein-got-regs-diagnosis-right-prescription-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 03:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concentration of media ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media convergence review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Finkelstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=288001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Convergence Review Report has effectively concluded that Ray Finkelstein got the diagnosis right but the prescription wrong when he recommended statutory regulation for news media.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/01/simons-review-says-finkelstein-got-regs-diagnosis-right-prescription-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The regulation revolution of the Convergence Review</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/01/keane-regulation-revolution-of-the-convergence-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/01/keane-regulation-revolution-of-the-convergence-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 03:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEDIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convergence review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media convergence review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=287934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A single, revolutionary concept forms the basis of many of the recommendations of the Convergence Review.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/01/keane-regulation-revolution-of-the-convergence-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Decoding the Convergence Review</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/01/crikey-says-decoding-the-convergence-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/01/crikey-says-decoding-the-convergence-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 03:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concentration of media ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[convergence review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media convergence review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media moguls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ownership laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=287897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We're creating a one-stop shop for you: short of reading the report yourself, <em>Crikey</em>'s idiot's guide to the Convergence Review is the closest you'll come to forming a bigger picture.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/05/01/crikey-says-decoding-the-convergence-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 915/1035 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2013-05-19 15:43:13 -->