Mandatory detention


Detention debt destroyed

After much debate, including a Crikey analysis of which Coalition members supported the bill, the charging of immigration detainees and asylum seekers for their mandatory detention has been scrapped.

USA’s detain & deport crimes worse than Australia’s

However unjust and dysfunctional the administration of Australia’s immigration laws have been in our recent past, it is being outstripped by what has been happening in the USA, writes Andrew Bartlett.

Coalition splits on abolishing detainees’ debts

Many former detainees are taking a great interest in the Migration Amendment (Abolishing Detention Debt) Bill 2009 that’s currently being debated in the Lower House.

Seeking asylum is not illegal

Sharman Stone’s claims this week that there is a “major new surge” of asylum seekers is just low rent political posturing.

The Liberal Party’s long history of playing the race card

Despite Joe Hockey’s indignant posturing over the weekend, the fact is that the Liberal Party has used race over the past two decades for its own political advantage, writes Greg Barns.

Australia’s human rights record under attack

Australia’s human rights record has come under scrutiny by the international watchdog, writes Dan Ziffer.

Ruddock and Howard can look forward to mandatory litigation

Mr Ruddock’s role in the Haneef affair might seem like a walk in the park when placed alongside the scrutiny that will inevitably be applied to his role in prosecuting the policy of mandatory detention for asylum seekers, writes Greg Barns.

Your Say: Daily Mail readers' feedback: Comments, corrections, clarifications, and c*ckups

Mandatory detention … nuclear power … Wikipedia … Frank Lowy … The West Wing and Obama … Jim Stynes …

Mungo: Howard’s detention regime diminished us all

Mandatory detention wasn’t John Howard’s idea, but its manipulation as a cynical political device most certainly was, writes Mungo MacCallum.

Bartlett: Don’t sack the minister, change the migration act

Any inquiry into the conduct of the case against Dr Haneef would be remiss if it did not include a thorough examination and revision of aspects of migration law, writes Senator Andrew Bartlett.