<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; journalistic standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/journalistic-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;This is cool&#8221; vs. &#8220;smells funny&#8221; science stories</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/03/16/the-value-of-this-is-cool-science-stories/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/03/16/the-value-of-this-is-cool-science-stories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 04:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=141191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are "news you can use" science stories the best way to engage the masses on otherwise nerdy topics? Or just cheap populism at the expense of "serious" science journalism? A defense of popular science.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/03/16/the-value-of-this-is-cool-science-stories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why we can no longer trust the WSJ</title>
		<link>http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/wsj_kagan_softball_trust.php?page=all</link>
		<comments>http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/wsj_kagan_softball_trust.php?page=all#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 04:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=138318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, the <em>Wall St Journal</em> ran a front-page photo of Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan playing softball. It was clearly implying she is a lesbian, says <b>Ryan Chittum</b>: this never would have happened at the pre-Murdoch <em>Journal</em>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/wsj_kagan_softball_trust.php?page=all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Newsweek journo: we lied, plagarised, and drank vodka</title>
		<link>http://www.boston.com/ae/media/articles/2010/05/11/when_a_being_a_journalist_on_the_rise_was_a_glass_half_filled_job/</link>
		<comments>http://www.boston.com/ae/media/articles/2010/05/11/when_a_being_a_journalist_on_the_rise_was_a_glass_half_filled_job/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 02:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=137864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Veteran journo <b>Alex Beam</b> reminisces on cutting his news industry chops at <em>Newsweek</em> in the 1970s: it was "like an upside-down journalism school" where he learned lots of bad habits -- like poaching content from <em>TIME</em>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.boston.com/ae/media/articles/2010/05/11/when_a_being_a_journalist_on_the_rise_was_a_glass_half_filled_job/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Day vs. Crikey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2010/04/26/mark-day-and-me/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2010/04/26/mark-day-and-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crikey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Australian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=133328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>The Australian</em>'s <b>Mark Day</b> <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/crikeys-comment-on-williams-murder-indefensible/story-e6frg9tf-1225858109802"</a>has taken a swipe at <em>Crikey</em>'s muckraking journalism. Talk to the hand, says <b>Margaret Simons</b>.</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2010/04/26/mark-day-and-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Journos fail the spelling test</title>
		<link>http://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/news/100419survey.shtml</link>
		<comments>http://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/news/100419survey.shtml#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 03:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=132016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hundreds of UK and US journalists took <a href="http://freeonlinesurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?sid=790xxyiygz0y5xa713437">a spelling test</a> by The Spelling Society -- and the results aren't good. A quarter couldn't spell "embarrassed", and many also tripped up on "millennium", "accidentally" and "liaison". ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.holdthefrontpage.co.uk/news/100419survey.shtml/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 15 US papers that didn&#8217;t lead with health reform</title>
		<link>http://www.thewrap.com/ind-column/15-newspapers-did-not-mention-health-care-mondays-front-page-15507</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewrap.com/ind-column/15-newspapers-did-not-mention-health-care-mondays-front-page-15507#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lazy journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US health reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=125853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was arguably the biggest story in the world yesterday: Obama's historic health care reforms. But <em>Media Alley</em> has dug up 15 newspapers that didn't run with it on their covers. So what was more important? "Boy Scouts learn skills at Merit Badge College"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewrap.com/ind-column/15-newspapers-did-not-mention-health-care-mondays-front-page-15507/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spinning the Media: It&#8217;s up to you to read between the lines</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/22/spinning-the-media-its-up-to-you-to-read-between-the-lines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/22/spinning-the-media-its-up-to-you-to-read-between-the-lines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spinning the Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=125016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the term "special report" actually industry parlance for "advertising feature" in some editorial departments? <b>Daniel Bishton</b> canvasses opinion on the topic.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/22/spinning-the-media-its-up-to-you-to-read-between-the-lines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Going undercover as a content farmer</title>
		<link>http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1971409,00.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1971409,00.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cracked.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demand Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eHow.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=124637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Demand Media is the "biggest, scariest content machine on the web", paying an army of freelancers to churn out traffic-driving content for sites like <a href="http://www.eHow.com">eHow.com</a> and <a href="<a href="http://www.cracked.com">Cracked.com</a>. Is there real money to be made? It it credible journalism? <em>TIME</em> journo <b>Dan Fletcher</b> gives it a crack.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1971409,00.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The honeymoon is over at your ABC</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/16/the-honeymoon-is-over-at-your-abc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/16/the-honeymoon-is-over-at-your-abc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 02:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV & Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2SM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of the ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspoll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=123560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Compare and contrast some recent ABC efforts with those of talkback radio.  The results might surprise.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/16/the-honeymoon-is-over-at-your-abc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Over half your news is spin</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/15/over-half-your-news-is-spin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/15/over-half-your-news-is-spin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spinning the Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=123044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Crikey</em> reveals the results of a six-month investigation into the role PR plays in the Australian media, finding that 55% of newspaper stories analysed were driven by PR. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/15/over-half-your-news-is-spin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The spin cycle: how your newspaper fared</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/15/the-spin-cycle-how-your-newspaper-fared/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/15/the-spin-cycle-how-your-newspaper-fared/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graph pr0n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spinning the Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=123113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A joint study between <em>Crikey</em> and the ACIJ has found that nearly 55% of Australian newspaper articles analysed were driven by some form of PR. See all the damning data.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/15/the-spin-cycle-how-your-newspaper-fared/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Editor of The Courier Mail, David Fagan, responds</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/15/david-fagan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/15/david-fagan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david fagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spinning the Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the courier mail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=123136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Courier Mail</em> editor David Fagan responds to our <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/spinning-the-media">Spinning The Media</a> study findings that 55% of the articles analysed in his paper were initiated by public relations.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/15/david-fagan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Editor of The Hobart Mercury, Garry Bailey, responds</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/15/garry-bailey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/15/garry-bailey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garry Bailey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hobart mercury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spinning the Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=123127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Hobart Mercury</em> editor Garry Bailey responds to our <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/spinning-the-media">Spinning The Media</a> study findings that many of the articles analysed in his paper were initiated by public relations.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/15/garry-bailey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Read Reuters&#8217; new social media guidelines</title>
		<link>http://www.thewrap.com/ind-column/reuters-doesnt-want-its-reporters-breaking-news-twitter-15175</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewrap.com/ind-column/reuters-doesnt-want-its-reporters-breaking-news-twitter-15175#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=122774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News agency <em>Reuters</em> has released a new set of social media guidelines for its staffers: don't break news on Twitter, don't reveal your political preferences, and no hacking. Read the full "handbook" <a href="http://handbook.reuters.com/index.php/Reporting_from_the_internet#Social_media_guidelines">here</a>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewrap.com/ind-column/reuters-doesnt-want-its-reporters-breaking-news-twitter-15175/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ethics of blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.upstart.net.au/ethical-blogging-a-10-point-guide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.upstart.net.au/ethical-blogging-a-10-point-guide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=119783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Citizen journalism gets it fair share of criticism for its lack of ethics, so <em>Upstart</em> offers a guide to ethical blogging, from linking to sources to realising that anyone may see your work.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.upstart.net.au/ethical-blogging-a-10-point-guide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear journalists: stop working for free</title>
		<link>http://newsosaur.blogspot.com/2010/02/stop-exploitation-of-journalists.html</link>
		<comments>http://newsosaur.blogspot.com/2010/02/stop-exploitation-of-journalists.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media death watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=113834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journalists are just speeding up their own demise by doing unpaid or underpaid work, says media veteran <b>Alan Mutter</b> in a call-out for all writers to stop working for free.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newsosaur.blogspot.com/2010/02/stop-exploitation-of-journalists.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why you can&#8217;t trust a thing you read</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/01/12/media</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/01/12/media#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 02:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=109751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American media is fundamentally unreliable, says <b>Glenn Greenwald</b>: a mix of dodgy sources, unnecessary anonymity, and outright lies means we shouldn't believe anything we read -- even in papers like the <em>NYT</em>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/01/12/media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The year of calling &#8220;bullshit&#8221;: 2009 in media errors</title>
		<link>http://www.regrettheerror.com/2009/12/16/crunks-2009-the-year-in-media-errors-and-corrections/</link>
		<comments>http://www.regrettheerror.com/2009/12/16/crunks-2009-the-year-in-media-errors-and-corrections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plagiarism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=106545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fact checking is fast becoming one of the internet's favourite pastimes, says <b>Craig Silverman</b>, wrapping-up of the worst lies and cock-ups published, broadcast and tweeted in 2009. The Apology of the Year is an absolute corker. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.regrettheerror.com/2009/12/16/crunks-2009-the-year-in-media-errors-and-corrections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Rupert ruined the WSJ</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/14/business/media/14carr.html?_r=2&#038;hp</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/14/business/media/14carr.html?_r=2&#038;hp#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=105719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the second anniversary of Rupert Murdoch's purchase of the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, current and former writers say his conservative politics have tainted the paper's editorial objectivity and quality.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/14/business/media/14carr.html?_r=2&#038;hp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the press twisted the tale of Hawke&#8217;s bday bash</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2009/12/14/unfortunate/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2009/12/14/unfortunate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 01:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=105558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The press had great fun last week because whoever organised Bob Hawke's birthday party stupidly decided to include a dancer in a bikini with a John Howard face mask -- and anyone who attended became fair game for attack, writes <b>Jeremy Sears</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2009/12/14/unfortunate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Celebrity op-eds: the height of lazy journalism</title>
		<link>http://gawker.com/5418798/why-celebrity-op+eds-suck?skyline=true&#038;s=x</link>
		<comments>http://gawker.com/5418798/why-celebrity-op+eds-suck?skyline=true&#038;s=x#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[op-eds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=103612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US papers, even huge, reputable ones like the <em>NYT</em> and <em>WSJ</em>, are suckers for a celebrity op-ed, with Bono, Sean Penn, and even James Franco (really?) recently receiving column inches for no other reason than their stardom. It sucks, says <b>Ravi Somaiya</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/5418798/why-celebrity-op+eds-suck?skyline=true&#038;s=x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A battle between old and new media in the White House press corps</title>
		<link>http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/1209/New_WH_pool_rotation_sparks_debate.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/1209/New_WH_pool_rotation_sparks_debate.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talking Points Memo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House press corps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=103367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the old-school hacks in the White House press corps are angry about the addition of online newcomers like <a href="http://www.tpm.com">TPM</a> and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com">HuffPo</a> to their exclusive club, saying it blurs the line between news and punditry.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/1209/New_WH_pool_rotation_sparks_debate.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY Post attacks Tiger Woods with Photoshop</title>
		<link>http://www.thewrap.com/ind-column/new-york-post-photoshops-tiger-11176</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewrap.com/ind-column/new-york-post-photoshops-tiger-11176#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoshopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Woods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=103343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's digital retouching, and then there's... this: The <em>New York Post</em>'s latest cover features a picture of Tiger Woods, with scars, cuts, broken teeth and bandages Photoshopped in. Tasteful. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewrap.com/ind-column/new-york-post-photoshops-tiger-11176/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No more free lunch for bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2009/12/01/were_bloggers____we_get_stuff_for_free/</link>
		<comments>http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2009/12/01/were_bloggers____we_get_stuff_for_free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash for comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=102764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of today, bloggers and tweeters in the US will be required by law to disclose any freebies and payments they get for product reviews or endorsements. Some of them are a bit miffed.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2009/12/01/were_bloggers____we_get_stuff_for_free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News Ltd blurs the line between ads and editorial</title>
		<link>http://mumbrella.com.au/ads-and-editorial-move-closer-at-news-ltd-11382</link>
		<comments>http://mumbrella.com.au/ads-and-editorial-move-closer-at-news-ltd-11382#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Limited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Magazines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=98075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several News Ltd publications are treading a very thin line between advertising and editorial by offering special product spruiks for high-paying advertisers -- including an endorsement from the editor themselves. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mumbrella.com.au/ads-and-editorial-move-closer-at-news-ltd-11382/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1619/1874 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 08:41:00 -->
