<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; journalistic ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/journalistic-ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Kid on the Block: Journalist Complaints? Get it off your chest</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/02/06/new-kid-on-the-block-journalist-complaints-get-it-off-your-chest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/02/06/new-kid-on-the-block-journalist-complaints-get-it-off-your-chest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 02:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courier-Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Kid on the Block]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=272689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journalist Complaints, launched just weeks ago, is an example of citizens taking the monitoring of the media into their own hands, in the absence of an effective regulator.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/02/06/new-kid-on-the-block-journalist-complaints-get-it-off-your-chest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protecting sources … when is a journalist not a journalist?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/28/protecting-sources-%e2%80%a6-when-is-a-journalist-not-a-journalist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/28/protecting-sources-%e2%80%a6-when-is-a-journalist-not-a-journalist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Bolt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists' sources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=255750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just who is and isn’t a journalist is yet to be tested in court. One day, surely, it will be and that will be very interesting indeed. Is bad journalism, such as Andrew Bolt’s recent litigated inaccuracies, still journalism. Is good blogging journalism? Interesting questions.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/28/protecting-sources-%e2%80%a6-when-is-a-journalist-not-a-journalist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media soft-pedals approach to murky world of disclosure</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/28/media-soft-pedals-approach-to-murky-world-of-disclosure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/28/media-soft-pedals-approach-to-murky-world-of-disclosure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists' code of ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=255725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think in this saga the Herald Sun has been more clueless than culpable -- although sometimes deep cluelessness can itself be culpable.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/28/media-soft-pedals-approach-to-murky-world-of-disclosure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alarm over pharma-sponsored journalism at The Australian</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/27/alarm-over-pharma-sponsored-journalism-at-the-australian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/27/alarm-over-pharma-sponsored-journalism-at-the-australian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 02:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Sweet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clive Mathieson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists' code of ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicines Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Australian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=255363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journalism leaders and researchers have raised concerns about a deal between the pharma industry group Medicines Australia and <em>The Australian</em>, which has led to direct sponsorship of health journalism.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/27/alarm-over-pharma-sponsored-journalism-at-the-australian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate to re-open bloggers versus journalists</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/09/senate-to-re-open-bloggers-versus-journalists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/09/senate-to-re-open-bloggers-versus-journalists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 02:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=184204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That tired "bloggers are not journalists" debate looks like it’ll surface in Australia’s Senate soon, thanks to the Greens. It’ll be annoying. But it’ll be a good thing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/09/senate-to-re-open-bloggers-versus-journalists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simons: it wasn&#8217;t unethical to name Grog&#8217;s Gamut</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/28/simons-it-wasnt-unethical-to-name-grogs-gamut/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/28/simons-it-wasnt-unethical-to-name-grogs-gamut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 03:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grog's Gamut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists on Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Australian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=174799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As for Grog's Gamut, I don’t think the Oz has done anything unethical. Just mean. But there are other questions to be answered.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/28/simons-it-wasnt-unethical-to-name-grogs-gamut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warning! This article contains unsourced, unverified information from Wikipedia</title>
		<link>http://www.tomscott.com/warnings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tomscott.com/warnings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 01:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warning stickers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=165088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just what every discerning newspaper reader needs: hilarious warning stickers. They help distinguish between stories based on an unverified, anonymous tipoff and those written too close to deadline to check facts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tomscott.com/warnings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hunger for a story v right to privacy: can the media balance both?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/06/hunger-for-a-story-v-right-to-privacy-can-the-media-balance-both/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/06/hunger-for-a-story-v-right-to-privacy-can-the-media-balance-both/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 03:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australian journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hartigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Keating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to know coalition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=161809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Am I wrong in thinking that there is a change coming in attitudes to the thing that so many in the community regard as an oxymoron: journalism ethics? Paul Keating offered an unassailable argument for sensible privacy legislation.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/06/hunger-for-a-story-v-right-to-privacy-can-the-media-balance-both/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Journalists are overly precious</title>
		<link>http://www.pbs.org/idealab/2010/06/why-cant-journalists-handle-public-criticism167.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.pbs.org/idealab/2010/06/why-cant-journalists-handle-public-criticism167.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 07:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public critcism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=147664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many professions face public criticism, yet journalists seem to take personal offence when their own work is called into question. How can they dish it daily but not take it themselves?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pbs.org/idealab/2010/06/why-cant-journalists-handle-public-criticism167.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holmes: Getting to the source of it</title>
		<link>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/06/10/2923369.htm?site=thedrum</link>
		<comments>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/06/10/2923369.htm?site=thedrum#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists' code of ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalists' sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=145233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Jonathan Holmes</b> tells the story of his trip to Argentina in 1978 to report on government's killings and kidnappings. A key witness appeared, but who could guarantee a source's safety?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/06/10/2923369.htm?site=thedrum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Journalists condemn Channel Seven</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/28/journalists-educators-tell-ch-7-what-you-did-to-david-campbell-is-deplorable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/28/journalists-educators-tell-ch-7-what-you-did-to-david-campbell-is-deplorable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 03:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV & Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Channel Seven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Meakin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=142098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journalists around the country have signed their names to an open letter condemning Channel Seven's exposure of NSW MP David Campbell, writes <b>Jenna Price</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/28/journalists-educators-tell-ch-7-what-you-did-to-david-campbell-is-deplorable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In defense of journalists stalking Sarah Palin</title>
		<link>http://www.slate.com/id/2255087/</link>
		<comments>http://www.slate.com/id/2255087/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 00:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigative journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe McGinniss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=141708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journalist Joe McGinnis is writing a book about Sarah Palin. What better way to get to know her than by <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/05/palins-nosy-new-neighbor.html">moving in next door</a>? Palin is <a href="http://www.facebook.com/notes/sarah-palin/just-when-ya-think-it-cant-get-any-more-interesting-welcome-neighbor/392687973434">pissed</a>, but <b>Jack Shafer</b> reckons it's fair (a a little grubby) game.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.slate.com/id/2255087/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;This is cool&#8221; vs. &#8220;smells funny&#8221; science stories</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/03/16/the-value-of-this-is-cool-science-stories/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/03/16/the-value-of-this-is-cool-science-stories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 04:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=141191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are "news you can use" science stories the best way to engage the masses on otherwise nerdy topics? Or just cheap populism at the expense of "serious" science journalism? A defense of popular science.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2010/03/16/the-value-of-this-is-cool-science-stories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenslade: When tabloid journalism gets it right</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/may/24/newsoftheworld-prince-andrew</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/may/24/newsoftheworld-prince-andrew#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 00:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entrapment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarah ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tabloid journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=140999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <em>News of the World</em>'s <a href="http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/822206/Duchess-of-York-Sarah-Ferguson-plots-to-sell-access-to-Prince-Andrew.html">expose</a> on Fergie trying to sell off access to Prince Andrew for £500,000 was all above board, says <b>Roy Greenslade</b>. Sometimes journalists are justified in using entrapment. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2010/may/24/newsoftheworld-prince-andrew/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beecher: Tabloid media laughing all the way to the pub on Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/24/beecher-tabloid-media-laughing-all-the-way-to-the-pub-on-campbell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/24/beecher-tabloid-media-laughing-all-the-way-to-the-pub-on-campbell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 03:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Beecher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV & Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ken's of kensington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tabloid journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=140712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest "debate" about media and privacy, triggered by last week's television expose of NSW Minister David Campbell leaving a gay club, is a sham conducted by people who are paid extremely well to legitimise something that is nasty and indefensible.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/24/beecher-tabloid-media-laughing-all-the-way-to-the-pub-on-campbell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simons: Why I won&#8217;t accept a free e-reader (even though I really want one)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2010/05/20/even-crikey-reporters-get-freebies-sigh/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2010/05/20/even-crikey-reporters-get-freebies-sigh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 05:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/20/simons-why-i-wont-accept-a-free-e-reader-even-though-i-really-want-one/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Borders has sent our media blogger <b>Margaret Simons</b> a free e-reader, but although she needs and wants one, she's giving it to the local Rotary op-shop instead. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2010/05/20/even-crikey-reporters-get-freebies-sigh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why we can no longer trust the WSJ</title>
		<link>http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/wsj_kagan_softball_trust.php?page=all</link>
		<comments>http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/wsj_kagan_softball_trust.php?page=all#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 04:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=138318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, the <em>Wall St Journal</em> ran a front-page photo of Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan playing softball. It was clearly implying she is a lesbian, says <b>Ryan Chittum</b>: this never would have happened at the pre-Murdoch <em>Journal</em>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/wsj_kagan_softball_trust.php?page=all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Newsweek journo: we lied, plagarised, and drank vodka</title>
		<link>http://www.boston.com/ae/media/articles/2010/05/11/when_a_being_a_journalist_on_the_rise_was_a_glass_half_filled_job/</link>
		<comments>http://www.boston.com/ae/media/articles/2010/05/11/when_a_being_a_journalist_on_the_rise_was_a_glass_half_filled_job/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 02:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=137864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Veteran journo <b>Alex Beam</b> reminisces on cutting his news industry chops at <em>Newsweek</em> in the 1970s: it was "like an upside-down journalism school" where he learned lots of bad habits -- like poaching content from <em>TIME</em>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.boston.com/ae/media/articles/2010/05/11/when_a_being_a_journalist_on_the_rise_was_a_glass_half_filled_job/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Elena Kagan gay? Who cares?</title>
		<link>http://motherjones.com/politics/2010/05/elena-kagan-gay-rumors-supreme-court</link>
		<comments>http://motherjones.com/politics/2010/05/elena-kagan-gay-rumors-supreme-court#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 01:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=137837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The endless media speculation over the sexuality of new Supreme Court Justice nominee Elena Kagan is just thinly veiled misogyny, says <b>Stephanie Mencimer</b>. So she plays poker and smokes cigars? Get over it.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://motherjones.com/politics/2010/05/elena-kagan-gay-rumors-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charlie Beckett: How to report on a hung parliament</title>
		<link>http://www.charliebeckett.org/?p=2833</link>
		<comments>http://www.charliebeckett.org/?p=2833#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 01:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hung parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=137314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Britain's hung parliament presents a big challenge for journalists. Experienced hack <b>Charlie Beckett</b> explains how journos can report impartially and proportionately on a hung parliament, without getting too dull and wonky. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.charliebeckett.org/?p=2833/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Holmes: Deveny didn&#8217;t deserve the dumping</title>
		<link>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/05/06/2891732.htm?site=thedrum</link>
		<comments>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/05/06/2891732.htm?site=thedrum#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 06:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catherine deveny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=136381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Jonathan Holmes</b> weighs in on the Catherine Deveny sacking debacle, outing himself for his <a href="http://twitter.com/jonaholmesMW/status/13239957359">own controversial Logies tweeting</a> from his official ABC account. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/05/06/2891732.htm?site=thedrum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Day vs. Crikey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2010/04/26/mark-day-and-me/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2010/04/26/mark-day-and-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crikey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Australian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=133328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>The Australian</em>'s <b>Mark Day</b> <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/crikeys-comment-on-williams-murder-indefensible/story-e6frg9tf-1225858109802"</a>has taken a swipe at <em>Crikey</em>'s muckraking journalism. Talk to the hand, says <b>Margaret Simons</b>.</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2010/04/26/mark-day-and-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did the NRL scoop the media?</title>
		<link>http://www.upstart.net.au/did-the-sports-media-drop-the-ball/</link>
		<comments>http://www.upstart.net.au/did-the-sports-media-drop-the-ball/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=133007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Melbourne Storm salary cap scandal is already one of the biggest stories in Australian sporting history -- but the news was broken by the NRL, not the media. Did Australia's sports media drop the ball?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.upstart.net.au/did-the-sports-media-drop-the-ball/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Burying ethics for the sake of photojournalism</title>
		<link>http://www.adevelopingstory.org/2010/pulitzer-center-crisis-in-ethics</link>
		<comments>http://www.adevelopingstory.org/2010/pulitzer-center-crisis-in-ethics#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Vernaschi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photojournalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=132652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photographer Marco Vernaschi created <a href="http://www.photoshelter.com/c/marco_vernaschi/gallery/CHILD-SACRIFICE-Uganda/G0000x1HawSRNvQo/">a stunning and shocking series</a> of images on child sacrifice in Uganda. But to get the shots, he persuaded a grieving mother to exhume her mutilated daughter's body so that he could photograph it, raising some serious ethical and legal questions.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.adevelopingstory.org/2010/pulitzer-center-crisis-in-ethics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Dog on the Moon&#8217;s guide to ethics</title>
		<link>http://www.upstart.net.au/first-dog-and-the-ethics-of-being-funny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.upstart.net.au/first-dog-and-the-ethics-of-being-funny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 04:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoonists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Dog on the Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political cartoons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=131281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Crikey's</em> celebrity cartoonist First Dog on the Moon talks the ethics of political cartooning and what it's like to make biting political satire at the expense of others. "Sometimes I enjoy being mean and I feel ashamed" he says.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.upstart.net.au/first-dog-and-the-ethics-of-being-funny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1584/1842 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-11 03:59:22 -->
