<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; joint strike fighters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/joint-strike-fighters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Our new attack aircraft: the end of the JSF?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2011/01/04/two-aircraft-that-put-pressure-on-the-jsf/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2011/01/04/two-aircraft-that-put-pressure-on-the-jsf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 23:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Sandilands</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australian defence force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Strike Fighter program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint strike fighters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=195230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The appearance of two all new attack and defend aircraft have raised issues of substance for the Joint Strike Fighter program, and indicate that the US and its allies should carefully review their plans to maintain air superiority, reports <b>Ben Sandilands</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2011/01/04/two-aircraft-that-put-pressure-on-the-jsf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joint Strike Fighter strafes thousands of homes with noise</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/06/22/joint-strike-fighter-strafes-thousands-of-homes-with-noise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/06/22/joint-strike-fighter-strafes-thousands-of-homes-with-noise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 03:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Sandilands</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint strike fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint strike fighters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williamtown RAAF base]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=147446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter has destroyed the value of thousands of homes in the Port Stephens area through revised noise exposure boundaries imposed last week. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/06/22/joint-strike-fighter-strafes-thousands-of-homes-with-noise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JSF: The truth about that rushed $3.2 billion commitment</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2010/03/21/jsf-the-truth-about-that-rushed-3-2-billion-commitment/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2010/03/21/jsf-the-truth-about-that-rushed-3-2-billion-commitment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Faulkner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint strike fighters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lockheed martin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=124905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defence Minister John Faulkner was conned into promising $3.2 billion upfront for 14 completely useless, low-rate F-35s because Lockheed Martin is running a project with the capacity to swallow a very large fraction of US and western allied GDP, writes <b>Ben Sandilands</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2010/03/21/jsf-the-truth-about-that-rushed-3-2-billion-commitment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time for Defence to come clean on the JSF debacle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2010/03/12/memo-defence-come-clean-now-on-jsf-debacle/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2010/03/12/memo-defence-come-clean-now-on-jsf-debacle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Sandilands</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Faulkner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint strike fighters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=122751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new report on the JSF Joint Strike Fighter project was released in US Congress today, and it is a shocker: the cost has shot up 60-90% per jet, and they are running at least two-and-a-half years late. Time for our own government to admit it's a flop, says <b>Ben Sandilands</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2010/03/12/memo-defence-come-clean-now-on-jsf-debacle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joint Strike Fighter project &#8212; now firing &#8230; at least in the US</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/03/joint-strike-fighter-project-now-firing-at-least-in-the-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/03/joint-strike-fighter-project-now-firing-at-least-in-the-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Sandilands</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australian defence force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Faulkner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint strike fighters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=113924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US backlash against the Joint Strike Fighter F-35 project needs to spread quickly to Australia, before more damage is done to Australia's defence interests. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/03/joint-strike-fighter-project-now-firing-at-least-in-the-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politicians haven&#8217;t done homework on Joint Strike Fighters</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/24/politicians-havent-done-homework-on-joint-strike-fighters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/24/politicians-havent-done-homework-on-joint-strike-fighters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australian defence force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint strike fighters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=100464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia’s national security committee may make an approval on the Joint Strike Fighter project today. But what do they have to base a sound purchase decision on? Nothing, says <b>Eric Palmer</b>.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/24/politicians-havent-done-homework-on-joint-strike-fighters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The JSF project &#8230; the J is for &#8216;joke&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/crikey-clarifier-the-jsf-project-the-j-is-for-joke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/crikey-clarifier-the-jsf-project-the-j-is-for-joke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Sandilands</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crikey Clarifier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint strike fighters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Armed Forces]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/crikey-clarifier-the-jsf-project-the-j-is-for-joke/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The JSF or Joint Strike Fighter is a massively hyped, much-delayed defence project by which a single type of jet will supposedly defend the US and its  allies from baddies. Think of a super duper X-box with wings. It has got everything. Or has it? asks <b>Ben Sandilands</b>.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/crikey-clarifier-the-jsf-project-the-j-is-for-joke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memo to Joel Fitzgibbon: Why not wait for the White Paper?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/29/memo-to-joel-fitzgibbon-why-not-wait-for-the-white-paper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/29/memo-to-joel-fitzgibbon-why-not-wait-for-the-white-paper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defence White Paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint strike fighters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ordering new fighter planes before the Defence White Paper is finished is a tad premature, argues former Office of national Assessments strategist <b>Sam Roggeveen</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/29/memo-to-joel-fitzgibbon-why-not-wait-for-the-white-paper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 782/869 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 06:36:06 -->
