<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; joint strike fighters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/joint-strike-fighters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Politicians haven&#8217;t done homework on Joint Strike Fighters</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/24/politicians-havent-done-homework-on-joint-strike-fighters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/24/politicians-havent-done-homework-on-joint-strike-fighters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australian defence force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint strike fighters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=100464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia’s national security committee may make an approval on the Joint Strike Fighter project today. But what do they have to base a sound purchase decision on? Nothing, says <b>Eric Palmer</b>.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/24/politicians-havent-done-homework-on-joint-strike-fighters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The JSF project &#8230; the J is for &#8216;joke&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/crikey-clarifier-the-jsf-project-the-j-is-for-joke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/crikey-clarifier-the-jsf-project-the-j-is-for-joke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Sandilands</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crikey Clarifier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aviation industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint strike fighters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Armed Forces]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/crikey-clarifier-the-jsf-project-the-j-is-for-joke/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The JSF or Joint Strike Fighter is a massively hyped, much-delayed defence project by which a single type of jet will supposedly defend the US and its  allies from baddies. Think of a super duper X-box with wings. It has got everything. Or has it? asks <b>Ben Sandilands</b>.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/30/crikey-clarifier-the-jsf-project-the-j-is-for-joke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memo to Joel Fitzgibbon: Why not wait for the White Paper?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/29/memo-to-joel-fitzgibbon-why-not-wait-for-the-white-paper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/29/memo-to-joel-fitzgibbon-why-not-wait-for-the-white-paper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defence White Paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint strike fighters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ordering new fighter planes before the Defence White Paper is finished is a tad premature, argues former Office of national Assessments strategist <b>Sam Roggeveen</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/29/memo-to-joel-fitzgibbon-why-not-wait-for-the-white-paper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
