<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; ISP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/isp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Where do Australia&#8217;s ISPs stand on the filter?</title>
		<link>http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/ISPs-on-the-filter-Who-s-for-who-s-against/0,130061791,339300109,00.htm?omnRef=1337</link>
		<comments>http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/ISPs-on-the-filter-Who-s-for-who-s-against/0,130061791,339300109,00.htm?omnRef=1337#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet service providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=106905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>ZDNet</em> has quizzed the big Aussie Internet Service Providers over their positions on mandatory internet filtering, compiling a list on who stands where. Does <em>your ISP</em> hate freedom? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/ISPs-on-the-filter-Who-s-for-who-s-against/0,130061791,339300109,00.htm?omnRef=1337/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telstra split: good or bad idea?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/16/great-for-competition-or-one-true-nbn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/16/great-for-competition-or-one-true-nbn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Broadband Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telstra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/16/great-for-competition-or-one-true-nbn/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online reaction to Telstra's not-quite-forced "structural separation" is split. Telstra shareholders are angry. Everyone else is quietly jubilant -- especially Telstra's key competitors.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/09/16/great-for-competition-or-one-true-nbn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Broadband Network, Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/08/national-broadband-network-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/08/national-broadband-network-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 1999 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Clarifier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADSL2+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Broadband Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless broadband]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=50783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NBN: wireless broadband, the magic of the “contention ratio” and how the network provider connects to an Internet Service Provider (ISP) to make “the internet industry”.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/08/national-broadband-network-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media briefs: CBS manages a profit and loss &#8230; HuffPo writer goes postal</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/31/media-briefs-cbs-manages-a-profit-and-loss-huffpo-writer-goes-postal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/31/media-briefs-cbs-manages-a-profit-and-loss-huffpo-writer-goes-postal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CBS manages a profit and loss ... Australian Women Online on ISP Filtering Debate ... HuffPo writer goes postal ... Don't piss the boomers off ...Bloggers post election]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/31/media-briefs-cbs-manages-a-profit-and-loss-huffpo-writer-goes-postal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And the Wankley Award goes to &#8230; Conroy&#8217;s net filtering scheme</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/17/and-the-wankley-award-goes-to-conroys-net-filtering-scheme/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/17/and-the-wankley-award-goes-to-conroys-net-filtering-scheme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Won't someone think of the adults? Australia’s march to a Chinese censorship regime took a interesting turn this week when new details emerged on the Rudd Government’s Great Firewall of Australia internet filtering scheme, writes <b>Duncan Riley</b>.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/17/and-the-wankley-award-goes-to-conroys-net-filtering-scheme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 632/692 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-11 16:46:05 -->
