<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; internet filtering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/internet-filtering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Offended by &#8216;nanny state&#8217;, Coalition wants more censorship on gambling</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/03/offended-by-nanny-state-coalition-wants-more-censorship-on-gambling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/03/offended-by-nanny-state-coalition-wants-more-censorship-on-gambling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 02:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online gambling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=256777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Coalition has proposed greater internet censorship as part of its counter-proposals on gambling reform. The US experience shows it doesn't work.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/03/offended-by-nanny-state-coalition-wants-more-censorship-on-gambling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is voluntary internet filtering a crime?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/04/is-voluntary-internet-filtering-a-crime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/04/is-voluntary-internet-filtering-a-crime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 02:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exploitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Ludlam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=239314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The voluntary filtering being introduced by some of Australia's major internet service providers (ISPs) is on shaky legal ground.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/04/is-voluntary-internet-filtering-a-crime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet filtering isn&#8217;t compulsory, but everyone will volunteer</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/30/internet-filtering-isnt-compulsory-but-everyone-will-volunteer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/30/internet-filtering-isnt-compulsory-but-everyone-will-volunteer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=232493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia's mandatory internet filtering by internet service providers (ISPs) won't happen for at least two years. But we're getting filtering anyway. Voluntarily.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/30/internet-filtering-isnt-compulsory-but-everyone-will-volunteer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cyberspace freedom &#8230; except where they upset the copyright industry</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/20/cyberspace-freedom-except-where-they-upset-the-copyright-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/20/cyberspace-freedom-except-where-they-upset-the-copyright-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 03:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=224425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Obama Administration's Cyberspace strategy places heavy emphasis on freedom, but in practice it's only as much freedom as the copyright industry wants]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/20/cyberspace-freedom-except-where-they-upset-the-copyright-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letter from Hanoi: freedom of speech fails as net filter falters</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/29/letter-from-hanoi-freedom-of-speech-fails-as-net-filter-falters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/29/letter-from-hanoi-freedom-of-speech-fails-as-net-filter-falters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vietnam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=159067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vietnam is acting like what some have called an enemy of the internet is true. Whether it’s doing a very good job is up for debate, writes a Hanoi resident. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/07/29/letter-from-hanoi-freedom-of-speech-fails-as-net-filter-falters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conroy: We didn&#8217;t claim filtering was a silver-bullet solution</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/03/conroy-weve-didnt-claim-filtering-was-a-silver-bullet-solution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/03/conroy-weve-didnt-claim-filtering-was-a-silver-bullet-solution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=113833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ISP filtering is just <em>one</em> component of the government's cyber-safety policy, writes <b>Senator Stephen Conroy</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/03/conroy-weve-didnt-claim-filtering-was-a-silver-bullet-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Day: In defence of Conroy&#8217;s filter</title>
		<link>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/internet-villain-stephen-conroy-comes-up-with-top-spin/story-e6frg996-1225825248885</link>
		<comments>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/internet-villain-stephen-conroy-comes-up-with-top-spin/story-e6frg996-1225825248885#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 01:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=113132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Mark Day</b> defends the Minister Stephen Conroy's plan to filter Australia's web content with a challenge to its critics: if you don't like it, make a plausible case for why we need access to "online bestiality or child sex abuse". Them's fightin' words.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/internet-villain-stephen-conroy-comes-up-with-top-spin/story-e6frg996-1225825248885/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where do Australia&#8217;s ISPs stand on the filter?</title>
		<link>http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/ISPs-on-the-filter-Who-s-for-who-s-against/0,130061791,339300109,00.htm?omnRef=1337</link>
		<comments>http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/ISPs-on-the-filter-Who-s-for-who-s-against/0,130061791,339300109,00.htm?omnRef=1337#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet service providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=106905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>ZDNet</em> has quizzed the big Aussie Internet Service Providers over their positions on mandatory internet filtering, compiling a list on who stands where. Does <em>your ISP</em> hate freedom? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/ISPs-on-the-filter-Who-s-for-who-s-against/0,130061791,339300109,00.htm?omnRef=1337/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conroy’s continued lies and gaffes</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/02/conroy%e2%80%99s-continued-lies-and-gaffes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/02/conroy%e2%80%99s-continued-lies-and-gaffes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=49881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Computers don't respond to rhetoric, persuasion or emotional appeals. Computers don't have a "mostly" function. Geeks, therefore, demand clear language, writes <b>Stilgherrian</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/04/02/conroy%e2%80%99s-continued-lies-and-gaffes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACMA&#8217;s blacklist just got read all over</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/20/acmas-blacklist-just-got-read-all-over/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/20/acmas-blacklist-just-got-read-all-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blacklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The more you try to hide your controversial Internet blacklist, Senator Conroy, the bigger you make it, the bigger the incentive for someone to leak it, writes <b>Stilgherrian</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/20/acmas-blacklist-just-got-read-all-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who supports compulsory Internet filtering, exactly?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/01/28/who-supports-compulsory-internet-filtering-exactly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/01/28/who-supports-compulsory-internet-filtering-exactly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australian christian lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clive hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GetUp!'s "Save The Net" campaign and a new survey by Netspace paint the supporters of compulsory Internet filtering as the minority, writes <b>Stilgherrian</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/01/28/who-supports-compulsory-internet-filtering-exactly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet censorship. Nice idea, just not practical.</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/21/internet-censorship-nice-idea-just-not-practical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/21/internet-censorship-nice-idea-just-not-practical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet service provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The internet is more than a new-fangled cross between a TV and a newspaper. Regardless of your position on the desirability of applying a censorship system, the practicalities make it impossible, writes <b>Colin Jacobs</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/11/21/internet-censorship-nice-idea-just-not-practical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The case for internet filtering</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/28/first-dog-on-the-moon-229/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/28/first-dog-on-the-moon-229/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Firstdog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[First Dog on the Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haveyourbunnyrepeatedly.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rabbit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Fielding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Conroy stupid?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/28/first-dog-on-the-moon-229/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1011/1135 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 04:28:52 -->
