<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; internet censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/internet-censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Parliament House filter blocks all .info sites</title>
		<link>http://sydwalker.info/blog/2012/02/02/big-brother-filters-parliament-house-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://sydwalker.info/blog/2012/02/02/big-brother-filters-parliament-house-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliament House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=272272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After being told by an MP that the Parliament House computers wouldn't let them view his blog, <b>Syd Walker</b> started asking questions about which sites are blocked for parliamentarians.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sydwalker.info/blog/2012/02/02/big-brother-filters-parliament-house-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Offended by &#8216;nanny state&#8217;, Coalition wants more censorship on gambling</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/03/offended-by-nanny-state-coalition-wants-more-censorship-on-gambling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/03/offended-by-nanny-state-coalition-wants-more-censorship-on-gambling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 02:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online gambling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=256777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Coalition has proposed greater internet censorship as part of its counter-proposals on gambling reform. The US experience shows it doesn't work.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/03/offended-by-nanny-state-coalition-wants-more-censorship-on-gambling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarkozy&#8217;s government war on the internet</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/27/crikey-says-a-government-war-on-the-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/27/crikey-says-a-government-war-on-the-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 03:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicolas Sarkozy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=225646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So as Europe teeters on the brink of another financial crisis, and the US economy struggles to recover amid staggering levels of government debt, what is Nicolas Sarkozy's priority for the G8 meeting in Deauville?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/27/crikey-says-a-government-war-on-the-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The western companies propping up Mubarak&#8217;s Egypt regime</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/09/the-western-companies-propping-up-mubaraks-egypt-regime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/09/the-western-companies-propping-up-mubaraks-egypt-regime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 02:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Rest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American defence industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[egypt protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teargas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vodafone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=202171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some Western companies are closely collaborating with Middle Eastern regimes trying to suppress protests. But it's not all plain sailing, as global outsources will explain.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/09/the-western-companies-propping-up-mubaraks-egypt-regime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How America could censor the internet &#8230; or not</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/29/how-america-could-censor-the-internet-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/29/how-america-could-censor-the-internet-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=175132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it,” claims Gilmore’s Law. Could the US really censor copyright infringers off the internet? On the surface, yes. In reality, says <b>Stilgherrian</b>, no.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/29/how-america-could-censor-the-internet-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The government is watching what you read on the internet</title>
		<link>http://www.zdnet.com.au/govt-wants-isps-to-record-browsing-history-339303785.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.zdnet.com.au/govt-wants-isps-to-record-browsing-history-339303785.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 05:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet service providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=145663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Internet Service Providers may soon be obliged to provide law enforcement agencies with the browsing history of their customers. It's to help prevent terrorism and paedophilia, but is it a step too far?
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zdnet.com.au/govt-wants-isps-to-record-browsing-history-339303785.htm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mags start self-censoring to please Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.shinyshiny.tv/2010/05/apples_itunes_censors_fashion_magazines.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.shinyshiny.tv/2010/05/apples_itunes_censors_fashion_magazines.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media censorship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=137287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple's "no-nipples" policy means fashion magazines are now censoring their iPad editions to keep their titles in iTunes. Apparently the latest edition of <em>Dazed &#038; Confused</em> has been nick-named "the Iran edition".]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.shinyshiny.tv/2010/05/apples_itunes_censors_fashion_magazines.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No sex, no YouTube, no Facebook &#8212; Conroy&#8217;s still watching you</title>
		<link>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/internet-censorship-remains-part-of-conroys-agenda/story-e6frg6zo-1225863648749</link>
		<comments>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/internet-censorship-remains-part-of-conroys-agenda/story-e6frg6zo-1225863648749#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 23:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clive hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Election 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=136804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy's <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/great-firewall-of-australia/">controversial</a> internet filter has been placed on the backburner in the hope that it won't become a major election issue. But stay alert, writes <b>Ross Fitzgerald</b>, the internet filter will come back even more draconian than ever.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/internet-censorship-remains-part-of-conroys-agenda/story-e6frg6zo-1225863648749/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which blog is the Australian government trying to censor?</title>
		<link>http://northcoastvoices.blogspot.com/2010/04/so-which-blog-did-australian-government.html</link>
		<comments>http://northcoastvoices.blogspot.com/2010/04/so-which-blog-did-australian-government.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=132610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday, Google <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/greater-transparency-around-government.html">released</a> <a href="http://www.google.com/governmentrequests/">data</a> on government censorship requests from last year, revealing that an Australian government asked for a blog to be removed. So which blog was it? asks <em>North Coast Voices</em>. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://northcoastvoices.blogspot.com/2010/04/so-which-blog-did-australian-government.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google maps government censorship requests around the world</title>
		<link>http://www.google.com/governmentrequests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.google.com/governmentrequests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revealed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=132152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google reveals -- via Google Maps, naturally -- the number requests to censor content received from governments worldwide, in six months alone. Brazil tops the list, though a big red question mark still hangs over China.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.google.com/governmentrequests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pentagon&#8217;s war on WikiLeaks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/03/27/wikileaks</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/03/27/wikileaks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=127069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://wikileaks.org/">WikiLeaks</a> has long been pissing off governments by obtaining and publishing their secret and sensitive documents online. And as <a href="http://file.wikileaks.org/file/us-intel-wikileaks.pdf">this secret Pentagon report</a> [PDF] reveals, it hasn't gone un-noticed. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/03/27/wikileaks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The countries Google is still censoring</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinsider.com/google-censorship-2010-3</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessinsider.com/google-censorship-2010-3#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 04:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=126973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has been <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/mar/24/google-china-sergey-brin-censorship">galloping about</a> on its moral high horse since it stopped censoring search results in China -- but it's still censoring results in many other countries, reveals <em>Business Insider</em>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessinsider.com/google-censorship-2010-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to climb over the Great Firewall of China</title>
		<link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/25/china-internet-how-to-beat-censorship</link>
		<comments>http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/25/china-internet-how-to-beat-censorship#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=126375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China puts millions of dollars and employs tens of thousands of people to keep its internet heavily censored -- but enterprising citizens have still found ways around it. The <em>Guardian</em> explains how it's done.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/25/china-internet-how-to-beat-censorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China&#8217;s instructions on reporting on Google</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/24/AR2010032402511_pf.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/24/AR2010032402511_pf.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=126348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Straight from the Ministry of Truth: the <em>WashPo</em> has a leaked copy of the Chinese government's instructions to news sites on how to report on Google's decision to stop censoring its search results. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/24/AR2010032402511_pf.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s daily log of what China is blocking</title>
		<link>http://www.google.com/prc/report.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.google.com/prc/report.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=126054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is keeping track of which of its services are currently being blocked in mainland China. Gmail and News are still accessible, but Blogger and YouTube are no-go zones.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.google.com/prc/report.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google founder talks China</title>
		<link>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704266504575141064259998090.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEADNewsCollection</link>
		<comments>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704266504575141064259998090.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEADNewsCollection#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sergey Brin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=125974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google co-founder Sergey Brin explains why the company finally decided to stop playing ball with the Chinese government's internet censorship, and says doing business with them reminded him of his childhood in the Soviet Union.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704266504575141064259998090.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEADNewsCollection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The big cracks in the Great Firewall of China</title>
		<link>http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE62M1CQ20100323</link>
		<comments>http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE62M1CQ20100323#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=125732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can't access Facebook or YouTube in China -- but you <em>can</em> freely look at porn. The Chinese government is OK with its citizens sharing pics of their willies -- just not sharing political information.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE62M1CQ20100323/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google shows Beijing the red rag on censorship</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/23/google-shows-beijing-the-red-rag-on-censorship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/23/google-shows-beijing-the-red-rag-on-censorship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=125422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has stopped censoring its search engine results in China today, in what Human Rights Watch has described as “a crucial moment for freedom of expression in China”.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/23/google-shows-beijing-the-red-rag-on-censorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google: We no longer hate freedom</title>
		<link>http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/new-approach-to-china-update.html</link>
		<comments>http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/new-approach-to-china-update.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=125368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has officially stopped censoring its searches in China today. The company's Senior Vice President <b>David Drummond</b> explains how and why they did it.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/new-approach-to-china-update.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If China throws out Google, let&#8217;s throw out their computers</title>
		<link>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gilbert-b-kaplan/if-china-throws-out-googl_b_501217.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gilbert-b-kaplan/if-china-throws-out-googl_b_501217.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[op-eds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=124028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The free market cuts both ways, says international trade expert <b>Gilbert Kaplan</b>: If China won't give free access to Google, we shouldn't give them free access to our consumer markets.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gilbert-b-kaplan/if-china-throws-out-googl_b_501217.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;hearthrob blogger&#8221; taking on Beijing</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/13/world/asia/13hanhan.html?hp</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/13/world/asia/13hanhan.html?hp#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Han Han]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=123273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Han Han is a heartthrob race car driver, pop novelist and China's most popular blogger, but despite this sterling resume, even he is not immune from Beijing's internet censors. Now he's speaking out]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/13/world/asia/13hanhan.html?hp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook jerks should be ignored, not legislated against</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/02/facebook-jerks-should-be-ignored-not-legislated-against/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/02/facebook-jerks-should-be-ignored-not-legislated-against/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 02:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Xenophon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=120083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The offensive defacement last week of two Facebook pages became a minor flap in the media. Talk of an "online ombudsman" to deal with the issue is reactionary and unnecessary, says <b>Colin Jacobs</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/03/02/facebook-jerks-should-be-ignored-not-legislated-against/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The filter smackdown continues &#8212; now with added Google controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/15/the-filter-smackdown-continues-now-with-added-google-controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/15/the-filter-smackdown-continues-now-with-added-google-controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=116669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy's response on the internet filter didn't end the debate -- in fact, he appears to have opened up some new issues, including one with Google.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/15/the-filter-smackdown-continues-now-with-added-google-controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s so wrong with publicly identifying yourself?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/03/whats-so-wrong-with-publicly-identifying-yourself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/03/whats-so-wrong-with-publicly-identifying-yourself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Your Say: Daily Mail readers' feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fructose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prince william]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=113755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What <em>exactly</em> is the problem with making bloggers and commenters in SA publicly identify themselves? asks one <em>Crikey</em> reader. Plus, Prince William, Fructose and angry dads.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/03/whats-so-wrong-with-publicly-identifying-yourself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secrecy in SA: one law for MPs and another for the punters</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/03/secrecy-in-sa-one-law-for-mps-and-another-for-the-punters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/03/secrecy-in-sa-one-law-for-mps-and-another-for-the-punters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Barns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adelaide Advertiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mick Atkinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Rann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal freedoms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=113821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Labor government of Mike Rann in South Australia has a long track record of curtailing freedoms and rights. It seems, when it comes to secrecy there is one law for MPs in South Australia, and another for the punters.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/03/secrecy-in-sa-one-law-for-mps-and-another-for-the-punters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1637/1879 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 01:31:19 -->
