<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; industrial relations reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/industrial-relations-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Essential: no to uranium exports to India, yes to mining tax</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/21/essential-no-to-uranium-exports-to-india-yes-to-mining-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/21/essential-no-to-uranium-exports-to-india-yes-to-mining-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon pricing package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Essential Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial relations reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRRT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uranium exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WorkChoices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=260344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Voters back the mining tax but oppose uranium exports to India, today's Essential Report shows. And voters are less concerned about a return to Workchoices.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/21/essential-no-to-uranium-exports-to-india-yes-to-mining-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The long tradition of union &#8216;interference&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/09/the-long-tradition-of-union-interference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/09/the-long-tradition-of-union-interference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 02:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Work Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial relations reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qantas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WorkChoices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace Relations Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=258047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advocates of IR reform claim unions traditionally haven't been allowed to "interfere" in issues such as contracting out. Wrong.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/09/the-long-tradition-of-union-interference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delegitimising unions in the great game of labour v capital</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/02/delegitimising-unions-in-the-great-game-of-labour-v-capital/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/02/delegitimising-unions-in-the-great-game-of-labour-v-capital/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 01:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACTU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial relations reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macro economic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qantas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=256519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As voters become more estranged from corporations and economic reform, neither labour nor capital is responding effectively to the sentiment.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/02/delegitimising-unions-in-the-great-game-of-labour-v-capital/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>135</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberals in search of the case for IR reform</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/29/in-search-of-the-case-for-ir-reform-what-did-workchoices-accomplish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/29/in-search-of-the-case-for-ir-reform-what-did-workchoices-accomplish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 03:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial relations reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wage costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WorkChoices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=232182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since IR reformers won't explain why we need it, we've looked at what WorkChoices accomplished. It wasn't much.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/29/in-search-of-the-case-for-ir-reform-what-did-workchoices-accomplish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reith v Abbott: the early 90s wants its zeal back</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/28/reith-v-abbott-the-early-90s-just-called-and-wants-its-reform-zeal-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/28/reith-v-abbott-the-early-90s-just-called-and-wants-its-reform-zeal-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 03:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial relations reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hewson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malcolm fraser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Minchin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter reith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=231958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tensions between Tony Abbott and Peter Reith have deep roots in recent Liberal history. The former minister's eagerness to prevent a return to "the Fraser years", unencumbered by the party presidency, will be fascinating to watch.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/28/reith-v-abbott-the-early-90s-just-called-and-wants-its-reform-zeal-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The strange reform hypocrisy of Australian business</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/12/the-strange-reform-hypocrisy-of-australian-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/12/the-strange-reform-hypocrisy-of-australian-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Council of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hawke government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial relations reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superannuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=217034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australian business has an ordinary record of backing economic reform.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/04/12/the-strange-reform-hypocrisy-of-australian-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MacCormack: Oratory the loser on a day of fumbles</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/15/maccormack-oratory-the-loser-on-a-day-of-fumbles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/15/maccormack-oratory-the-loser-on-a-day-of-fumbles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial relations reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leadership transition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nixon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After weeks to prepare, the Prime Minister's performance at his election news conference was inexplicably poor. In his response, Rudd started poorly, too - stiff and stilted, writes David MacCormack.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/15/maccormack-oratory-the-loser-on-a-day-of-fumbles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 773/851 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 08:08:15 -->
