<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; income management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/income-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The media release the minister should&#8217;ve written on the NT Intervention</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/19/the-media-release-the-minister-shouldve-written-on-the-nt-intervention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/19/the-media-release-the-minister-shouldve-written-on-the-nt-intervention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 05:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indigenous communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indigenous health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT Intervention]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=253633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a draft alternative media release for Jenny Macklin -- what she should have said as a response to the current consultation rather than harping on about truancy and grog. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/19/the-media-release-the-minister-shouldve-written-on-the-nt-intervention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ignoring evidence may explain why the income management gap doesn’t close</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/26/ignoring-evidence-may-explain-why-the-income-management-gap-doesn%e2%80%99t-close/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/26/ignoring-evidence-may-explain-why-the-income-management-gap-doesn%e2%80%99t-close/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 03:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Centrelink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal rights alliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAHCSIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Income Management Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Productivity Commission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=243084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the Productivity Commission releases its latest report on Overcoming Indigenous Disadvantage, which shows only 13 of 45 measures showed any improvement and seven went backwards.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/26/ignoring-evidence-may-explain-why-the-income-management-gap-doesn%e2%80%99t-close/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whatever happened to evidence-based policy making?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/10/whatever-happened-to-evidence-based-policy-making/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/10/whatever-happened-to-evidence-based-policy-making/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 02:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alp government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goverment policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Income Management Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Territory intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT Intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=202192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal government is adding another serious question to its social and financial policy competence by informing the public that it is proceeding with the promised evaluation of the New Income Management Program. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/10/whatever-happened-to-evidence-based-policy-making/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Children still at risk despite income management</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/10/22/children-still-at-risk-despite-income-management/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/10/22/children-still-at-risk-despite-income-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 02:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT Intervention]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=180214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does income management work to make children safer? The evidence is not clearly there in the various evaluation studies that have been done.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/10/22/children-still-at-risk-despite-income-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government more ready to fund bureaucrats than welfare recipients</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/10/12/government-more-ready-to-fund-bureaucrats-than-welfare-recipients/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/10/12/government-more-ready-to-fund-bureaucrats-than-welfare-recipients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 02:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overcoming indigenous disadvantage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=177730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why not do a cost-benefit study on the costs of quarantining income voluntarily or compulsorily versus the benefits of more cash, direct services for children  and some widely available financial education for the same groups?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/10/12/government-more-ready-to-fund-bureaucrats-than-welfare-recipients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Business as usual under Labor’s &#8216;new&#8217; income management</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/20/business-as-usual-under-labor%e2%80%99s-new-income-management/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/20/business-as-usual-under-labor%e2%80%99s-new-income-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 03:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT Intervention]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=172852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Implementation of income management reforms has just meant one more round of racist, humiliating interaction with government bureaucracy for communities suffering under the intervention, writes <b>Paddy Gibson</b>. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/20/business-as-usual-under-labor%e2%80%99s-new-income-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Macklin&#8217;s office have no shame?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2010/05/17/does-macklins-office-have-any-shame-more-on-the-income-mgt-study/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2010/05/17/does-macklins-office-have-any-shame-more-on-the-income-mgt-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 06:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Sweet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indigenous health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=139170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin's dismissal of a review that <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/17/income-management-isnt-working-and-macklins-twisting-the-truth/">has found</a> income management is not making an impact on tobacco and healthy food sales in remote NT communities is an insult to the Government's professed commitment to “evidence-based policy”, writes <b>Melissa Sweet</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2010/05/17/does-macklins-office-have-any-shame-more-on-the-income-mgt-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Income management evidence trivialised in a lemonade solution</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2010/05/17/evidence-trivialised-in-a-lemonade-solution/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2010/05/17/evidence-trivialised-in-a-lemonade-solution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 03:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indigenous health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=139115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin’s response to the latest evidence that Income Management doesn’t work is only the latest example of anti-evidence based decisions in the welfare system, writes <b>Eva Cox</b>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2010/05/17/evidence-trivialised-in-a-lemonade-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Macklin&#8217;s twists truth on income management</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/17/income-management-isnt-working-and-macklins-twisting-the-truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/17/income-management-isnt-working-and-macklins-twisting-the-truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 03:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indigenous health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=138950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin has dismissed a new study revealing the government’s income management policy is <em>not</em> making an impact on tobacco and health food sales in indigenous communities. The study's authors hit back.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/17/income-management-isnt-working-and-macklins-twisting-the-truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cox: Should we base policy on opinions or evidence?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2010/03/31/will-caucus-allow-unproven-dangerous-changes-to-income-management-to-go-through-how-do-you-balance-expert-evidence-and-personal-communications-and-opinions/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2010/03/31/will-caucus-allow-unproven-dangerous-changes-to-income-management-to-go-through-how-do-you-balance-expert-evidence-and-personal-communications-and-opinions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 02:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT Intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=127585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MP Jenny Macklin says that she hears positive feedback from women about income management in the NT intervention, yet all evidence shows IM doesn't work. How do you balance personal claims against expert evidence? asks <b>Eva Cox</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2010/03/31/will-caucus-allow-unproven-dangerous-changes-to-income-management-to-go-through-how-do-you-balance-expert-evidence-and-personal-communications-and-opinions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Macklin&#8217;s income management a junk-food bonanza</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/25/macklins-income-management-a-junk-food-bonanza/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/25/macklins-income-management-a-junk-food-bonanza/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Territory intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=119179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal government's NT income management scheme has been branded a nutritional failure, with indigenous communities continuing to load up on junk food despite stringent measures meant to boost fruit and veggie sales.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/25/macklins-income-management-a-junk-food-bonanza/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The nasty maternalistic state</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2010/02/05/pushing-bad-policy-against-the-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2010/02/05/pushing-bad-policy-against-the-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 05:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the dole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=114717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sole parents and the unemployed beware: Jenny Macklin is trying to take half your income away. It's the most drastic change to our social security system ever -- and almost nobody knows about it, reports <b>Eva Cox</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2010/02/05/pushing-bad-policy-against-the-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data without destiny: Macklin fudges evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/18/data-without-destiny-macklin-fudges-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/18/data-without-destiny-macklin-fudges-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eva Cox</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aihw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australian institute of health and welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=106864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin's latest effort in justifying policy is her gross over-promoting of the results of a very small and dicey survey of 76 income-managed residents in four communities in the Northern Territory.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/18/data-without-destiny-macklin-fudges-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Income management the ultimate form of nannyism</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/30/income-management-the-ultimate-form-of-nannyism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/30/income-management-the-ultimate-form-of-nannyism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanny state]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=101862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rather than invoking nanny, let’s have an informed discussion about income management rooted in some sensible analysis of its potential benefits and costs -- including the likely harms, writes <b>Melissa Sweet</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/30/income-management-the-ultimate-form-of-nannyism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tough Love: has it ever worked?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2009/11/27/tough-love-has-it-ever-worked/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2009/11/27/tough-love-has-it-ever-worked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Sweet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=101653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the government prepares to roll out income management to all Australian welfare recipients, health policy experts ask: will it actually improve Australian's health and wellbeing? A resounding "NO".]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/croakey/2009/11/27/tough-love-has-it-ever-worked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labor brings welfare quarantining to a Centrelink near you!</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/27/labor-brings-welfare-quarantining-to-a-centrelink-near-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/27/labor-brings-welfare-quarantining-to-a-centrelink-near-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Centrelink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenny Macklin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newstart allowance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Youth Allowance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=101440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rather than attempting to punish struggling, low-income families, the government should be dealing with the underlying causes of neglect and delivering proper support for families in crisis, writes <b>Fernando de Freitas</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/27/labor-brings-welfare-quarantining-to-a-centrelink-near-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Income management works. Roll it out.</title>
		<link>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/tough-love-works-best/story-e6frg6zo-1225803899559</link>
		<comments>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/tough-love-works-best/story-e6frg6zo-1225803899559#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT Intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=101113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government's plan to extend income management beyond the NT intervention to the rest of Australia is good policy, says former Howard government adviser <b>David Moore</b>. Tough love is needed to protect women and children.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/tough-love-works-best/story-e6frg6zo-1225803899559/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Income management and refugees</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/23/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups-108/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/23/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups-108/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Your Say: Daily Mail readers' feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum seekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telstra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/23/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups-108/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Crikey</em> readers continue to weigh in on the messy asylum seekers debate. Plus, the surprising nature of extending compulsory income management to all Australians on welfare.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/23/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups-108/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mal Brough and the command(eer) economy</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/18/mal-brough-and-the-commandeer-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/18/mal-brough-and-the-commandeer-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorised officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management regime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welfare payments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hidden in the 500 or so pages of the government's National Emergency Response legislation is Mal Brough’s plan to commandeer community stores -- an extraordinary move, which would be inconceivable anywhere else in Australia.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/18/mal-brough-and-the-commandeer-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1269/1484 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 01:09:13 -->
