<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; iinet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/iinet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NBN retail pricing neither a bargain nor an extravagance</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/20/nbn-retail-pricing-neither-a-bargain-nor-an-extravagance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/20/nbn-retail-pricing-neither-a-bargain-nor-an-extravagance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 02:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Broadband Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBN Co.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=247995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the National Broadband Network retail pricing announced by iiNet yesterday, it becomes clear that claiming the NBN is too expensive, a bargain, or little-bear just right for the punters is a tad premature.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/20/nbn-retail-pricing-neither-a-bargain-nor-an-extravagance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The copyright industry&#8217;s war on filesharing: outsourced and ineffectual</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/08/the-copyright-industrys-war-on-filesharing-outsourced-and-ineffectual/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/08/the-copyright-industrys-war-on-filesharing-outsourced-and-ineffectual/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filesharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISPs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=208750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The copyright industry has changed tactics in its war on filesharing but it's still not working, even as it hits legitimate internet users.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/03/08/the-copyright-industrys-war-on-filesharing-outsourced-and-ineffectual/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AFACT versus iiNet appeal decision resolves nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/25/afact-versus-iinet-appeal-decision-resolves-nothing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/25/afact-versus-iinet-appeal-decision-resolves-nothing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 02:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film & TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=206384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps it’s time the movie industry paid attention to what happened with the music industry.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/25/afact-versus-iinet-appeal-decision-resolves-nothing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A question of red tape: iiNet and the Fringe dwellers of arts</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/25/a-question-of-red-tape-iinet-and-the-fringe-dwellers-of-arts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/25/a-question-of-red-tape-iinet-and-the-fringe-dwellers-of-arts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Eltham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[My Cup Of Tea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adelaide Fringe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet piracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=206276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While small arts companies struggle with red tape, the big end of town wants more regulation. The juxtaposition will shape future arts policy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/02/25/a-question-of-red-tape-iinet-and-the-fringe-dwellers-of-arts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The cultural revolution was online in 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/23/my-cup-of-tea-the-cultural-revolution-was-online-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/23/my-cup-of-tea-the-cultural-revolution-was-online-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Eltham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arts funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquor licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark zuckerberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music festivals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Social Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times (UK)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Tote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=194789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most important arts and "cultural" events of 2010 happened online, writes <b>Ben Eltham</b>, in his final <em>My Cup of Tea</em> column for the year.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/23/my-cup-of-tea-the-cultural-revolution-was-online-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IP industry&#8217;s border control measures makes for scary stuff</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/21/ip-industrys-border-control-measures-makes-for-scary-stuff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/21/ip-industrys-border-control-measures-makes-for-scary-stuff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=132228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An innovative society cannot be nurtured if the IP corporations holding monopoly rights are allowed to determine the economic and trade rules, circumvent courts and define constraints on civil liberties, says <b>Anna George</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/04/21/ip-industrys-border-control-measures-makes-for-scary-stuff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia&#8217;s internet: not neutral, not cheap, not very good</title>
		<link>http://arstechnica.com/telecom/news/2010/02/australias-internet-non-neutral-and-proud-of-it.ars</link>
		<comments>http://arstechnica.com/telecom/news/2010/02/australias-internet-non-neutral-and-proud-of-it.ars#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 05:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=116026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Net neutrality" is a hot issue in the States, where folks don't want their access to online content limited or influenced by ISPs. But Aussies needn't worry their pretty little heads about it: our internet hasn't been neutral for years.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://arstechnica.com/telecom/news/2010/02/australias-internet-non-neutral-and-proud-of-it.ars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conroy tells movie industry, ISPs to kiss and make up</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/08/conroy-tells-movie-industry-isps-to-kiss-and-make-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/08/conroy-tells-movie-industry-isps-to-kiss-and-make-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film & TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senator stephen conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=114907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After last week’s Federal Court win for internet service provider iiNet, the movie industry was looking to the government to help them out. But the government has told it to sort out its own problems.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/08/conroy-tells-movie-industry-isps-to-kiss-and-make-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iiNet decision a slapdown for AFACT, movie industry</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/05/iinet-decision-a-slapdown-for-afact-movie-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/05/iinet-decision-a-slapdown-for-afact-movie-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright act 1968]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=114581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After yesterday’s Federal Court decision clearing iiNet of responsibility for copyright infringement by their customers, the Australian Federation Against Copyright theft is considering its next steps.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/05/iinet-decision-a-slapdown-for-afact-movie-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iiNet decision: time for film industry to face the music</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/05/iinet-decision-time-for-film-industry-to-face-the-music/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/05/iinet-decision-time-for-film-industry-to-face-the-music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Barns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film & TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naxos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=114502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The film industry has not woken up to the fact that their business model is no longer valid, despite the latest iiNet legal win.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/05/iinet-decision-time-for-film-industry-to-face-the-music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iiNet and why ISPs can&#8217;t be content cops</title>
		<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100204/0103238038.shtml</link>
		<comments>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100204/0103238038.shtml#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=114442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday's big win by internet service provider iiNet -- clearing the company of responsibility for its users' illegal online downloading -- outlined exactly why ISPs can't easily or effectively police their customers' activities, explains <em>Techdirt</em>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100204/0103238038.shtml/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iiTrial: ISPs not responsible for users&#8217; copyright infringement</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/04/iitrial-isps-not-responsible-for-users-copyright-infringement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/04/iitrial-isps-not-responsible-for-users-copyright-infringement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet service providers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=114232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A landmark ruling in Australia's Federal Court today has cleared internet service provider iiNet from responsibility for its users' illegal file sharing. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/04/iitrial-isps-not-responsible-for-users-copyright-infringement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why AFACT v iiNet is important</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/08/why-afact-v-iinet-is-important/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/08/why-afact-v-iinet-is-important/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 02:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bittorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peer-to-peer file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/07/why-afact-v-iinet-is-important/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iiNet is battling AFACT over illegal sharing of copyright films, tv and music via peer-to-peer networks, and the implications will be wide reaching. Who <em>is</em> responsible for the content of internet traffic?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/08/why-afact-v-iinet-is-important/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Razer: Conroy should not be surprised at blacklist leak</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/23/razer-conroy-should-not-be-surprised-at-blacklist-leak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/23/razer-conroy-should-not-be-surprised-at-blacklist-leak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filtered internet connection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The emergence of the ACMA blacklist should have been as shocking to Stephen Conroy as, say, another tabloid sashay from Lindsay Lohan, writes <b>Helen Razer</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/23/razer-conroy-should-not-be-surprised-at-blacklist-leak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will ABC Online charge taxpayers to download Question Time?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/12/04/will-abc-online-charge-taxpayers-to-download-question-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/12/04/will-abc-online-charge-taxpayers-to-download-question-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn't it extraordinary that despite taxpayers paying for ABC content, licenses and ABC's development and web-hosting costs, they have to pay again because for all other ISPs, ABC content is metered? asks <b>Joshua Gans</b>.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/12/04/will-abc-online-charge-taxpayers-to-download-question-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crikey&#8217;s national broadband test: the results are in</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/06/28/crikeys-national-broadband-test-the-results-are-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/06/28/crikeys-national-broadband-test-the-results-are-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crikey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[download speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iinet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optusnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speedtest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From across Australia and the world, results have poured in from readers in response to Crikey's national broadband test. The results are illuminating in that they tell us ... well, not a lot actually. 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/06/28/crikeys-national-broadband-test-the-results-are-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1190/1354 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-11 19:37:10 -->
