<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; High Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/high-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s the vibe: interpreting s198A of the 1958 Migration Act</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/02/its-the-vibe-interpreting-s198a-of-the-1958-migration-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/02/its-the-vibe-interpreting-s198a-of-the-1958-migration-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 02:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High court decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration minister chris bowen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia Solution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=244859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ironically, a government whose members have in the past described the Pacific Solution as inhumane relied on and failed using the same legislation because it could not guarantee basic human rights protections, says <b>freelance writer Luke Williams</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/02/its-the-vibe-interpreting-s198a-of-the-1958-migration-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court skewers Howard, but Labor takes the blame</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/02/high-court-malaysia-solution-off-shore-labor-coalition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/02/high-court-malaysia-solution-off-shore-labor-coalition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 02:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Richardson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum seekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court malaysia solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia Solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=244856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What the High Court has invalidated is fundamentally the Coalition's policy: the obsession with offshore processing was entirely a creation of the Howard government ...  to Labor's  eternal shame, has allowed itself to be dragged along with it.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/02/high-court-malaysia-solution-off-shore-labor-coalition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gillard&#8217;s &#8216;lashing&#8217; of the High Court</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/02/wont-someone-think-of-their-honours-lashing-the-high-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/02/wont-someone-think-of-their-honours-lashing-the-high-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 02:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Brandis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia Solution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=244827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Criticism of the prime minister for attacking the High Court is rather precious, for a number of reasons. For a country that allegedly likes its politics "rough and tumble", we're suddenly all very precious.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/02/wont-someone-think-of-their-honours-lashing-the-high-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>135</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asylum seekers &#8230; just two long-term options available</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/02/asylum-seekers-just-two-long-term-options-available/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/02/asylum-seekers-just-two-long-term-options-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 02:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum seekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court malaysia solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia Solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nauru solution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=244763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Predictably all the media pundits are viewing the High Court decision through the prism of "politics of sport" and not taking pause to consider how the matter of continuing boat arrivals should be handled, writes <b>Jenny Norvick</b>, a former DIAC staffer and voluntary refugee settlement worker.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/02/asylum-seekers-just-two-long-term-options-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gillard wanted to be judged on asylum seekers</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/01/julia-gillard-malaysia-solution-high-court-failur/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/01/julia-gillard-malaysia-solution-high-court-failur/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 03:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum seekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boat people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysian Solution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=244472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Julia Gillard identified asylum seekers as a key issue for her. Now she deserves to be judged over the debacle.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/01/julia-gillard-malaysia-solution-high-court-failur/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>142</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malaysia Solution lost at sea</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/01/malaysia-solution-lost-at-sea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/01/malaysia-solution-lost-at-sea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 23:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amber Jamieson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum seekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boat people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia Solution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refugees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=244410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Crikey media wrap</b>: The federal government's refugee swap deal with Malaysia is in tatters after the High Court yesterday ruled the scheme unlawful.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/01/malaysia-solution-lost-at-sea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malaysia deal off: High Court rules against government</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2011/08/31/malaysia-deal-off-high-court-rules-against-government/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2011/08/31/malaysia-deal-off-high-court-rules-against-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 04:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysian Solution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=244398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal government's refugee swap deal with Malaysia is in tatters after the High Court ruled the scheme unlawful.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2011/08/31/malaysia-deal-off-high-court-rules-against-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malaysia deal in disarray</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/09/malaysia-deal-in-disarray/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/09/malaysia-deal-in-disarray/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 23:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amber Jamieson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum seekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysia deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malaysian Solution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=239968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government's much-hyped Malaysian Solution is in turmoil after the High Court ordered for a full hearing to be heard on the policy in a fortnight after a legal challenge by asylum seekers. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/09/malaysia-deal-in-disarray/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government can&#8217;t have a bob each way on boat people</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/15/mungo-government-cant-have-a-bob-each-way-on-boat-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/15/mungo-government-cant-have-a-bob-each-way-on-boat-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 02:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mungo MacCallum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mungo MacCallum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum seekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phillip Ruddock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refugees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=185945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Liberal Party's cadaver in waiting, Phillip Ruddock, described last week’s High Court decision on the rights of asylum seekers as "diabolical." The misuse of the word was so grotesque as to suggest that the former Immigration Minister and Attorney-General’s use of it might have itself been satanic inspiration.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/15/mungo-government-cant-have-a-bob-each-way-on-boat-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A win for asylum seekers: but how big?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/12/a-win-for-asylum-seekers-but-how-big/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/12/a-win-for-asylum-seekers-but-how-big/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum seekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Bowen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refugees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=185139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Crikey Media Wrap</b>: The High Court ruled yesterday that two Sri Lankan asylum seekers were denied "procedural fairness" by the Migration Act, as they were processed offshore. Will it end offshore processing or instead lengthen the time it takes to process claims?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/12/a-win-for-asylum-seekers-but-how-big/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court rules in favour of asylum seekers</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/11/high-court-rules-asylum-seekers-denied-procedural-fairness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/11/high-court-rules-asylum-seekers-denied-procedural-fairness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Cowie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum seekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refugees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=184942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A High Court ruling that two Sri Lankan asylum seekers were denied "procedural fairness" under the Migration Act will allow offshore arrivals to challenge their decision in Australian courts, says the instructing solicitor behind the case. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/11/high-court-rules-asylum-seekers-denied-procedural-fairness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court tells Rann &#8216;on ya bike&#8217;: anti-bikie laws unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/11/high-court-tells-rann-on-ya-bike-anti-bikie-laws-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/11/high-court-tells-rann-on-ya-bike-anti-bikie-laws-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Barns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bikie gangs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Australian Premier Mike Rann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=184935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The High Court this morning ruled unconstitutional a provision in Mike Rann’s anti-bikie laws that allows the Attorney-General to make a declaration, on the basis of secret evidence and without giving anyone a hearing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/11/high-court-tells-rann-on-ya-bike-anti-bikie-laws-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abbott&#8217;s judiciary thought bubble</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/11/crikey-says-abbotts-judiciary-thought-bubble/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/11/crikey-says-abbotts-judiciary-thought-bubble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 02:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum seekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bikie laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Rann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=184830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A big day in the High Court today, with two decisions set to cause waves. Both are potentially politically unpalatable decisions for Prime Minister Julia Gillard and South Australian Premier Mike Rann.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/11/11/crikey-says-abbotts-judiciary-thought-bubble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marr: Should ministers make life or death decisions?</title>
		<link>http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/detention-system-hinges-on-high-courts-decision-on-boat-people-20101110-17nmo.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/detention-system-hinges-on-high-courts-decision-on-boat-people-20101110-17nmo.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum seekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refugees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sri Lanka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamils]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=184865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canberra waits nervously for today's result to the High Court case involving the processing of two Sri Lankan asylum seekers. It could fundamentally affect how refugees are processed in Australia, explains <b>David Marr</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/detention-system-hinges-on-high-courts-decision-on-boat-people-20101110-17nmo.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court challenge could bring legal equity to offshore asylum-seekers</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/26/high-court-challenge-could-bring-legal-equity-to-offshore-asylum-seekers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/26/high-court-challenge-could-bring-legal-equity-to-offshore-asylum-seekers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 03:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Cowie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum seekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamils]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=167757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A High Court challenge to the detention of two Tamil refugees is about trying to bring legal equity to refugees who are processed offshore, says the instructing solicitor behind the case.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/08/26/high-court-challenge-could-bring-legal-equity-to-offshore-asylum-seekers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DNA doesn&#8217;t guarantee guilt</title>
		<link>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/dna-under-legal-microscope/story-e6frg97x-1225847156023</link>
		<comments>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/dna-under-legal-microscope/story-e6frg97x-1225847156023#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dna samples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=127176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the High Court to hear an appeal for a case reliant completely on DNA evidence, the value of DNA in legal proceedings is being questioned. It's not clear-cut scientific evidence but simply a statistical probability. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/dna-under-legal-microscope/story-e6frg97x-1225847156023/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Howard&#8217;s Military Court stuff-up</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/27/john-howards-five-star-military-court-stuff-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/27/john-howards-five-star-military-court-stuff-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Military Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Howard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/27/john-howards-five-star-military-court-stuff-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The High Court has, 7-zip, overturned an entire Federal Government judicial structure. But it's not as if the Howard Government wasn't warned, repeatedly, that this might happen.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/27/john-howards-five-star-military-court-stuff-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judgment needed for High Court</title>
		<link>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/a-better-way-to-choose-judges-20090713-dir2.html?page=-1</link>
		<comments>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/a-better-way-to-choose-judges-20090713-dir2.html?page=-1#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey Intern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=73255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How does Australia appoint High Court judges? The process needs to be examined, argues <b>George Williams</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/a-better-way-to-choose-judges-20090713-dir2.html?page=-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Note to Parliament: truth is not the words you use</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/08/note-to-parliament-truth-is-not-the-words-you-use/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/08/note-to-parliament-truth-is-not-the-words-you-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Barns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudd government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudd money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/08/note-to-parliament-truth-is-not-the-words-you-use/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politicians and media hype about emergencies do not pass muster with the High Court when it comes to Canberra justifying the constitutional validity of its actions.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/08/note-to-parliament-truth-is-not-the-words-you-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Questions for the legal system following Gassy case</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/11/some-questions-for-the-legal-system-arising-from-the-gassy-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/11/some-questions-for-the-legal-system-arising-from-the-gassy-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 03:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Sweet</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delusional disorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Eric Gassy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Kirby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=57041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something is surely amiss when a defendant, whom many experts believe to have a serious psychiatric disorder, is allowed to appear and represent himself before the country’s highest court.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/11/some-questions-for-the-legal-system-arising-from-the-gassy-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today Tonight indicted in get-rich-quick deal</title>
		<link>http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/story/0,28383,25408431-10229,00.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/story/0,28383,25408431-10229,00.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 00:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV & Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Today Tonight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade Practices Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildly Wealthy Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=54555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<i>Today Tonight</i> has been found guilty of breaching the Trade Practices Act for making deceptive claims about an investment mentoring program called Wildly Wealthy Women.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/story/0,28383,25408431-10229,00.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court rejects challenge to $900 bonus payment</title>
		<link>http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/High-Court-rejects-challenge-to-900-bonus-payment-pd20090403-QQVHU?OpenDocument</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/High-Court-rejects-challenge-to-900-bonus-payment-pd20090403-QQVHU?OpenDocument#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 04:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=50267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia's $42 billion recession-fighting stimulus package has survived a court challenge. Cue rejoicing on the streets.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/High-Court-rejects-challenge-to-900-bonus-payment-pd20090403-QQVHU?OpenDocument/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ice TV v Nine Network = landmark copyright case</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/17/ice-tv-v-nine-network-landmark-copyright-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/17/ice-tv-v-nine-network-landmark-copyright-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Are you entitled to own what you produce just because you put time and labour into producing it, ask <b>Brian Fitzgerald and Ben Atkinson</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/17/ice-tv-v-nine-network-landmark-copyright-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice French II: continuing Rudd&#8217;s Liberal penchant</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/31/justice-french-ii-continuing-rudds-liberal-penchant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/31/justice-french-ii-continuing-rudds-liberal-penchant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert french]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that Kevin Rudd is developing a penchant for appointing former Liberal and National Party members, writes <b>Noel Crichton-Browne</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/31/justice-french-ii-continuing-rudds-liberal-penchant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court concedes influence of stolen generations apology</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/31/high-court-concedes-influence-of-stolen-generations-apology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/31/high-court-concedes-influence-of-stolen-generations-apology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday’s High Court decision in Northern Territory of Australia v Arnhem Land Aboriginal Land Trust is one of those left-field events that can disrupt the entire political narrative of the nation, writes <b>Bernard Keane</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/31/high-court-concedes-influence-of-stolen-generations-apology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1567/1858 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-11 21:35:29 -->
