<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; High Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/high-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>John Howard&#8217;s Military Court stuff-up</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/27/john-howards-five-star-military-court-stuff-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/27/john-howards-five-star-military-court-stuff-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Military Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Howard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/27/john-howards-five-star-military-court-stuff-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The High Court has, 7-zip, overturned an entire Federal Government judicial structure. But it's not as if the Howard Government wasn't warned, repeatedly, that this might happen.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/08/27/john-howards-five-star-military-court-stuff-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Note to Parliament: truth is not the words you use</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/08/note-to-parliament-truth-is-not-the-words-you-use/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/08/note-to-parliament-truth-is-not-the-words-you-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 03:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Barns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudd government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudd money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus package]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/08/note-to-parliament-truth-is-not-the-words-you-use/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politicians and media hype about emergencies do not pass muster with the High Court when it comes to Canberra justifying the constitutional validity of its actions.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/07/08/note-to-parliament-truth-is-not-the-words-you-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Questions for the legal system following Gassy case</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/11/some-questions-for-the-legal-system-arising-from-the-gassy-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/11/some-questions-for-the-legal-system-arising-from-the-gassy-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 03:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Croakey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delusional disorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jean Eric Gassy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Kirby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=57041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something is surely amiss when a defendant, whom many experts believe to have a serious psychiatric disorder, is allowed to appear and represent himself before the country’s highest court.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/05/11/some-questions-for-the-legal-system-arising-from-the-gassy-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ice TV v Nine Network = landmark copyright case</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/17/ice-tv-v-nine-network-landmark-copyright-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/17/ice-tv-v-nine-network-landmark-copyright-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Are you entitled to own what you produce just because you put time and labour into producing it, ask <b>Brian Fitzgerald and Ben Atkinson</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/17/ice-tv-v-nine-network-landmark-copyright-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice French II: continuing Rudd&#8217;s Liberal penchant</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/31/justice-french-ii-continuing-rudds-liberal-penchant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/31/justice-french-ii-continuing-rudds-liberal-penchant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert french]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that Kevin Rudd is developing a penchant for appointing former Liberal and National Party members, writes <b>Noel Crichton-Browne</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/31/justice-french-ii-continuing-rudds-liberal-penchant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court concedes influence of stolen generations apology</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/31/high-court-concedes-influence-of-stolen-generations-apology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/31/high-court-concedes-influence-of-stolen-generations-apology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday’s High Court decision in Northern Territory of Australia v Arnhem Land Aboriginal Land Trust is one of those left-field events that can disrupt the entire political narrative of the nation, writes <b>Bernard Keane</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/31/high-court-concedes-influence-of-stolen-generations-apology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice French I: wresting back the High Court</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/31/justice-french-i-wresting-back-the-high-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/31/justice-french-i-wresting-back-the-high-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert french]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Rudd government has at last begun the task of wresting the High Court back from the conservatives who have dominated the bench for the last decade, writes <b>Greg Barns</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/31/justice-french-i-wresting-back-the-high-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gassy retrial decision corrects judge&#8217;s &#8216;glaring error&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/15/gassy-retrial-decision-corrects-judges-glaring-error/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/15/gassy-retrial-decision-corrects-judges-glaring-error/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The High Court decision to grant a retrial to Jean Gassy rights a legal wrong and ensures he faces a fair murder trial, writes <b>Greg Barns</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/15/gassy-retrial-decision-corrects-judges-glaring-error/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High Court announces retrial of Jean Eric Gassy</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/14/high-court-announces-retrial-of-jean-eric-gassy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/14/high-court-announces-retrial-of-jean-eric-gassy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal affairs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The High Court of Australia has ordered a retrial of deregistered psychiatrist Jean Eric Gassy, who was convicted in 2004 for the murder of former SA mental health chief Dr Margaret Tobin, writes <b>Melissa Sweet</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/14/high-court-announces-retrial-of-jean-eric-gassy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips and rumours</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/28/tips-and-rumours/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/28/tips-and-rumours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020 Summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nine Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympic torch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is understood that the Federal Government has included on its list of potential candidates for the appointment as Judge to the High Court, solicitor and Managing Partner of the Melbourne office of law firm Mallesons Stephen Jacques, Ros Grady. With Chief Justice Gleeson about to retire as he reaches the age of 70, one [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/28/tips-and-rumours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sons of Gwalia case haunting lenders</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/31/sons-of-gwalia-case-haunting-lenders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/31/sons-of-gwalia-case-haunting-lenders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insolvency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sons of gwalia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The High Court of Australia’s ruling in the Sons of Gwalia case was always an unpopular decision, and we are now seeing why, writes finance journalist <b>Ian Rogers</b>.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/03/31/sons-of-gwalia-case-haunting-lenders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
