<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; health screening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/health-screening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are breast cancer screening benefits being oversold?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/02/20/are-breast-cancer-screening-benefits-being-oversold/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/02/20/are-breast-cancer-screening-benefits-being-oversold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many leading cancer epidemiologists are now calling for women to be given more complete information about the probabilities, risks and benefits of screening, writes <b>Simon Chapman</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/02/20/are-breast-cancer-screening-benefits-being-oversold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Brough draft of the Intervention, from 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/06/the-brough-draught-of-the-intervention-from-2006/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/06/the-brough-draught-of-the-intervention-from-2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sophie Black</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crikey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mal brough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national indigenous times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NT Intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office of indigenous policy coordination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following leaked document reveals that Indigenous Affairs Minister Mal Brough floated the idea of medical checks for children for signs of s-xual abuse over a year ago. And as the exchange of correspondence shows, his advisers dismissed it as a bad idea, writes Sophie Black. 

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/06/the-brough-draught-of-the-intervention-from-2006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 489/526 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 07:49:20 -->
