<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; Great Firewall of Australia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/great-firewall-of-australia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:39:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The regulator and the regulated: sorry, but the internet won&#8217;t play that game</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/27/the-regulator-and-the-regulated-sorry-but-the-internet-wont-play-that-game/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/27/the-regulator-and-the-regulated-sorry-but-the-internet-wont-play-that-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 03:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=141733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy rants at Google and Facebook. But he hasn't worked out that they don't play that game, and aren't that interested in what governments think.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/27/the-regulator-and-the-regulated-sorry-but-the-internet-wont-play-that-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google vs. Stephen Conroy</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/26/google-vs-stephen-conroy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/26/google-vs-stephen-conroy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 23:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark zuckerberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media wrap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=141239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy is taking on internet giants Google and Facebook over their recent privacy breaches. But is he just capitalising on the public sentiment against the two companies to take the heat off his widely-panned internet filter plans?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/26/google-vs-stephen-conroy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conroy: We&#8217;ll block 50,000 sites</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2010/05/25/conroy-well-block-50000-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2010/05/25/conroy-well-block-50000-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 04:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=141195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy last night warned the Government would consider blocking up to 50,000 websites, before launching an attack on euthanasia websites and Facebook, reports <b>Bernard Keane</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/thestump/2010/05/25/conroy-well-block-50000-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No sex, no YouTube, no Facebook &#8212; Conroy&#8217;s still watching you</title>
		<link>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/internet-censorship-remains-part-of-conroys-agenda/story-e6frg6zo-1225863648749</link>
		<comments>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/internet-censorship-remains-part-of-conroys-agenda/story-e6frg6zo-1225863648749#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 23:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clive hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Election 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=136804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy's <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/great-firewall-of-australia/">controversial</a> internet filter has been placed on the backburner in the hope that it won't become a major election issue. But stay alert, writes <b>Ross Fitzgerald</b>, the internet filter will come back even more draconian than ever.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/internet-censorship-remains-part-of-conroys-agenda/story-e6frg6zo-1225863648749/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The filter smackdown continues &#8212; now with added Google controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/15/the-filter-smackdown-continues-now-with-added-google-controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/15/the-filter-smackdown-continues-now-with-added-google-controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=116669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy's response on the internet filter didn't end the debate -- in fact, he appears to have opened up some new issues, including one with Google.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/15/the-filter-smackdown-continues-now-with-added-google-controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conroy: We didn&#8217;t claim filtering was a silver-bullet solution</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/03/conroy-weve-didnt-claim-filtering-was-a-silver-bullet-solution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/03/conroy-weve-didnt-claim-filtering-was-a-silver-bullet-solution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=113833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ISP filtering is just <em>one</em> component of the government's cyber-safety policy, writes <b>Senator Stephen Conroy</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/03/conroy-weve-didnt-claim-filtering-was-a-silver-bullet-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Day: In defence of Conroy&#8217;s filter</title>
		<link>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/internet-villain-stephen-conroy-comes-up-with-top-spin/story-e6frg996-1225825248885</link>
		<comments>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/internet-villain-stephen-conroy-comes-up-with-top-spin/story-e6frg996-1225825248885#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 01:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=113132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Mark Day</b> defends the Minister Stephen Conroy's plan to filter Australia's web content with a challenge to its critics: if you don't like it, make a plausible case for why we need access to "online bestiality or child sex abuse". Them's fightin' words.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/internet-villain-stephen-conroy-comes-up-with-top-spin/story-e6frg996-1225825248885/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conroy frantically spins Clinton speech</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/25/conroy-frantically-spins-clinton-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/25/conroy-frantically-spins-clinton-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 02:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Broadband Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=111839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The debate over internet censorship has moved to the global centre stage, with Hillary Clinton declaring free access to information online as critical a human right. Will Rudd get on board? asks <b>Colin Jacobs</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/25/conroy-frantically-spins-clinton-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The copyright outrage the geeks forgot to mention</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/20/the-copyright-outrage-the-geeks-forgot-to-mention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/20/the-copyright-outrage-the-geeks-forgot-to-mention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer geeks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=110812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tech community hasn't done much of a job of persuading mainstream Australia that proposed internet censorship laws are a bad idea, despite their potentially crippling effect on freedom of speech, writes <b>Angus Kidman</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/20/the-copyright-outrage-the-geeks-forgot-to-mention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The AfPak conundrum</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/14/the-afpak-conundrum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/14/the-afpak-conundrum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 02:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Your Say: Daily Mail readers' feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=109566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Crikey</em> readers are up on their soapbox on Afghanistan, Rupert's paywall and Conroy's filter.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/14/the-afpak-conundrum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips and rumours: The Age staffers drop their pens and walk out</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/14/tips-and-rumours-161/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/14/tips-and-rumours-161/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 02:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips and rumours]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Drum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=109574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What's caused staffers at <em>The Age</em> to protest in front of their fancy new building? Plus, the sneaky relationship between Stephen Conroy, his religious right constituents and the internet filter.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/14/tips-and-rumours-161/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labor Senator Kate Lundy speaks out against mandatory internet censorship</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/13/labor-senator-kate-lundy-speaks-out-against-mandatory-internet-censorship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/13/labor-senator-kate-lundy-speaks-out-against-mandatory-internet-censorship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason Whittaker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Frontiers Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Lundy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=109276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least one member of the federal government stands opposed to mandatory internet censorship -- and she's prepared to fight for it.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/01/13/labor-senator-kate-lundy-speaks-out-against-mandatory-internet-censorship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cunning Conroy makes a weasel move</title>
		<link>http://www.inquisitr.com/55109/australian-government-to-delay-internet-censorship-until-after-next-election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inquisitr.com/55109/australian-government-to-delay-internet-censorship-until-after-next-election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=108384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The feared <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/great-firewall-of-australia/">Great Firewall of Australia</a>, Stephen Conroy's planned internet filter, will not be implemented until after the next federal election. A cynical move by a government fearing public uproar, writes <b>Duncan Riley.</b>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inquisitr.com/55109/australian-government-to-delay-internet-censorship-until-after-next-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen Conroy: Dear Crikey, here&#8217;s why you&#8217;re wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/23/stephen-conroy-dear-crikey-heres-why-youre-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/23/stephen-conroy-dear-crikey-heres-why-youre-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=107979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's fighting words from <b>Senator Stephen Conroy</b> as he rebuts the "disingenuous" coverage of his Great Firewall of Australia. You can't access RC-rated content in newsagencies, libraries, DVDs, cinemas or on TV, so why should it be allowed on the internet? asks <b>Conroy</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/23/stephen-conroy-dear-crikey-heres-why-youre-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>128</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A poetic view of Copenhagen</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/22/a-poetic-view-of-copenhagen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/22/a-poetic-view-of-copenhagen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 02:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Your Say: Daily Mail readers' feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=107567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One <em>Crikey</em> reader pens a lovely piece of poetry on Copenhagen, Imre Salusinszky weighs in Rundle and Windschuttle, while others argue over internet censorship and government Chritsmas propaganda.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/22/a-poetic-view-of-copenhagen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Send Conroy a lump of coal for Christmas</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/12/anti-censorship-group-wants-to-send-conroy-coal-for-xmas/#more-373073</link>
		<comments>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/12/anti-censorship-group-wants-to-send-conroy-coal-for-xmas/#more-373073#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=107557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new website called <a href="http://www.thegiftofcensorship.com/">The Gift Of Censorship</a> is promising to deliver a bag of coal in a large red sack to Stephen Conroy and for every 1000 complaint letters sent to him through the site.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2009/12/anti-censorship-group-wants-to-send-conroy-coal-for-xmas/#more-373073/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The swift takedown of stephenconroy.com.au</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/21/the-swift-takedown-of-stephenconroy-com-au/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/21/the-swift-takedown-of-stephenconroy-com-au/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Frontiers Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sapia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=107304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just hours after a bit of media publicity, an anti-Stephen Conroy website was pulled down by authorities. Was this a routine domain deregistration or something more sinister?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/21/the-swift-takedown-of-stephenconroy-com-au/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reporters Without Borders: Don&#8217;t do it, Rudd!</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/21/reporters-without-borders-dont-do-it-rudd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/21/reporters-without-borders-dont-do-it-rudd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reporters without Borders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=107396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reporters without Borders is so furious with Stephen Conroy's planned internet filter that it has penned an open letter to the PM, reports <b>Colin Jacobs</b> -- a development which should be alarming to anyone concerned with our image as an open democracy in the world.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/21/reporters-without-borders-dont-do-it-rudd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conroy&#8217;s plan has nothing to do with kiddie porn</title>
		<link>http://www.itnews.com.au/News/163063,commentary-why-we-dont-need-a-filter.aspx</link>
		<comments>http://www.itnews.com.au/News/163063,commentary-why-we-dont-need-a-filter.aspx#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACMA blacklist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=107132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "Refused Classification" content that will be blocked by Conroy's internet filter is <em>not</em> the same as "illegal" content, explains <b>Mark Newton</b>: much of it is perfectly legal content that someone, somewhere found a bit offensive.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.itnews.com.au/News/163063,commentary-why-we-dont-need-a-filter.aspx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009: the internet&#8217;s watershed year</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/18/2009-the-internets-watershed-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/18/2009-the-internets-watershed-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Broadband Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=106951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Between the National Broadband Network, mandatory ISP filtering, and the strange and wonderful world of Twitter, 2009 was the year that the internet truly moved to the centre stage of Australian politics. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/18/2009-the-internets-watershed-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ATO uses Wikipedia &#8230; Our Great Firewall &#8230; Fairfax Christmas bonanza &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/18/media-briefs-ato-uses-wikipedia-our-great-firewall-fairfax-christmas-bonanza/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/18/media-briefs-ato-uses-wikipedia-our-great-firewall-fairfax-christmas-bonanza/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Saturday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Age]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=106869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[International reports on our Great Firewall, the <em>Herald Sun</em> follows <em>Crikey's</em> lead, Facebook in factories, and more briefs on media from around the world. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/18/media-briefs-ato-uses-wikipedia-our-great-firewall-fairfax-christmas-bonanza/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where do Australia&#8217;s ISPs stand on the filter?</title>
		<link>http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/ISPs-on-the-filter-Who-s-for-who-s-against/0,130061791,339300109,00.htm?omnRef=1337</link>
		<comments>http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/ISPs-on-the-filter-Who-s-for-who-s-against/0,130061791,339300109,00.htm?omnRef=1337#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet service providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=106905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>ZDNet</em> has quizzed the big Aussie Internet Service Providers over their positions on mandatory internet filtering, compiling a list on who stands where. Does <em>your ISP</em> hate freedom? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/communications/soa/ISPs-on-the-filter-Who-s-for-who-s-against/0,130061791,339300109,00.htm?omnRef=1337/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conroy&#8217;s filter is bound to fail</title>
		<link>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/conroy-will-be-censoring-people-not-the-internet-20091217-kzxl.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/conroy-will-be-censoring-people-not-the-internet-20091217-kzxl.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australian christian lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet filter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=106833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new internet filter will censor those that don't understand the net. The irony being that young people -- whose delicate minds the filter is to protect -- get the internet better than most, writes <b>Nina Funnell</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/conroy-will-be-censoring-people-not-the-internet-20091217-kzxl.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To filter or not to filter, that is the Conroy</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/17/to-filter-or-not-to-filter-that-is-the-conroy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/17/to-filter-or-not-to-filter-that-is-the-conroy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Your Say: Daily Mail readers' feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=106493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good old internet filtering. The only subject that fires Crikey readers up more than climate change.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/17/to-filter-or-not-to-filter-that-is-the-conroy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet filtering: first step on the path to Burma?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/17/internet-filtering-first-step-on-the-path-to-burma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/17/internet-filtering-first-step-on-the-path-to-burma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Firewall of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Kirby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Conroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=106568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's a strange day indeed when retired Justice Michael Kirby and Fox News sing from the same hymn sheet. But Senator Stephen Conroy’s internet censorship plans have created that day.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/12/17/internet-filtering-first-step-on-the-path-to-burma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1575/1843 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-09 22:04:31 -->
