<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; government funding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/government-funding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A single national insurer? Sounds like healthy policy</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/04/a-single-national-insurer-sounds-like-healthy-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/04/a-single-national-insurer-sounds-like-healthy-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should we be moving away from private health insurance? <b>Ian McAuley</b> makes the case for a single national insurer.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/07/04/a-single-national-insurer-sounds-like-healthy-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rural doctors sprung on push for more cash</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/29/rural-doctors-sprung-on-push-for-more-cash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/29/rural-doctors-sprung-on-push-for-more-cash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rural doctors are arguing for yet more financial incentives to work in the bush. But the report they rely on doesn't exactly back them up, writes <b>Dr Sue Page</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/29/rural-doctors-sprung-on-push-for-more-cash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the private health insurance changes won’t break the system</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/23/why-the-private-health-insurance-changes-wont-break-the-system/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/23/why-the-private-health-insurance-changes-wont-break-the-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The evidence does not support claims that the budget’s private health insurance changes will break the public health system, writes <b>Jennifer Doggett</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/23/why-the-private-health-insurance-changes-wont-break-the-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What will drive change in health?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/22/what-will-drive-change-in-health/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/22/what-will-drive-change-in-health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two forces are visible that will drive change in the health system and in the health debate even though both, to a fair extent, have to do with money, writes <b>Stephen Leeder</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/22/what-will-drive-change-in-health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eva Cox: How the Budget demonises rich women</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/16/eva-cox-how-the-budget-demonises-rich-women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/16/eva-cox-how-the-budget-demonises-rich-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Baby Bonus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 08]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The two minor income tests to Family Tax Benefit B and the Baby Bonus have been puffed and discussed as though the recipient were Cruella de Ville, writes <b>Eva Cox</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/16/eva-cox-how-the-budget-demonises-rich-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family tax benefits still a mass of contradictions</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/15/family-tax-benefits-still-a-mass-of-contradictions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/15/family-tax-benefits-still-a-mass-of-contradictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Baby Bonus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 08]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tinkering around the edges of the existing layer cake system of family benefits will not fix the problem of middle class welfare, writes <b>Jessica Brown</b> of the CIS.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/15/family-tax-benefits-still-a-mass-of-contradictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budget boredom for schools but watch this space</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/15/budget-boredom-for-schools-but-watch-this-space/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/15/budget-boredom-for-schools-but-watch-this-space/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Budget 08]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The budget may have held only boring news for schools, but the new quadrennial funding agreement due later this year will have a far greater impact, writes <b>Jennifer Buckingham</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/05/15/budget-boredom-for-schools-but-watch-this-space/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adler: Quality arts require government protection</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/10/adler-quality-arts-require-government-protection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/10/adler-quality-arts-require-government-protection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the arts sector needed reminding of its lowly status in the free market arcadia the response to my suggestion that the arts need more secure funding should confirm it, writes <b>Louise Adler</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/10/adler-quality-arts-require-government-protection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IPA&#8217;s WiMax report is a double edged political sword</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/31/ipas-wimax-report-is-a-double-edged-political-sword/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/31/ipas-wimax-report-is-a-double-edged-political-sword/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senator stephen conroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telstra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wimax technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Labor is trying to make political capital out of an IPA paper that bags the Government’s plans for using WiMax technology for rural broadband. But they will be hoping said that no one reads the whole report, because there is plenty there to give Labor grief as well, writes Margaret Simons.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/31/ipas-wimax-report-is-a-double-edged-political-sword/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
