<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; global warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond the carbon price, a Faustian bargain</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/02/06/beyond-the-carbon-price-a-faustian-bargain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/02/06/beyond-the-carbon-price-a-faustian-bargain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 02:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Combet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=272413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Decarbonising the economy quickly is absolutely necessary, writes <b>David Spratt</b>, an author and researcher in climate change.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/02/06/beyond-the-carbon-price-a-faustian-bargain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep reading this, even if it is about Durban</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/12/crikey-says-keep-reading-this-even-if-it-is-about-durban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/12/crikey-says-keep-reading-this-even-if-it-is-about-durban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 02:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Durban climate talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Durban global treaty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Durban treaty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN climate talks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=264516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here it is: all countries have agreed to negotiate by 2015 a single, legally-binding global agreement that will cover all major carbon pollution emitters including the big guns -- China, India and the United States.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/12/crikey-says-keep-reading-this-even-if-it-is-about-durban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A nasty set of numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/05/crikey-says-a-nasty-set-of-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/05/crikey-says-a-nasty-set-of-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 01:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[durban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global carbon project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=263219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A collection of sobering take home points from a consortium of climate scientists and economists from around the world -- the Global Carbon Project -- and their findings for 2010, published today in the journal Nature Climate Change.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/05/crikey-says-a-nasty-set-of-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coba Point residents back Flannery in 2GB spat</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/25/residents-of-coba-point-back-flannerys-story-in-2gb-spat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/25/residents-of-coba-point-back-flannerys-story-in-2gb-spat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 02:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2GB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coba Point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Hadley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Flannery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=261515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Residents of the Sydney riverside retreat of Coba Point have backed environmentalist Tim Flannery in his bitter climate spat with 2GB presenter Ray Hadley and a dissenting neighbour David.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/25/residents-of-coba-point-back-flannerys-story-in-2gb-spat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crikey says: our energy future</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/11/crikey-says-our-energy-future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/11/crikey-says-our-energy-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 02:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine Milne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the greens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=258599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The door is closing...I am very worried – if we don't change direction now on how we use energy, we will end up beyond what scientists tell us is the minimum [for safety]. The door will be closed forever."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/11/11/crikey-says-our-energy-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate scientists slam George Pell&#8217;s &#8216;utter rubbish&#8217; claims</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/28/climate-scientists-slam-george-pells-utter-rubbish-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/28/climate-scientists-slam-george-pells-utter-rubbish-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardinal pell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate deniers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george pell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=255714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leading climate change researchers have launched a scathing attack on a speech delivered this week by Cardinal George Pell, describing it as "dreadful", "utter rubbish" and "flawed"., writes <b>Graham Readfearn</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/10/28/climate-scientists-slam-george-pells-utter-rubbish-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>190</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oz to push for more ambitious emissions targets on international stage</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/21/oz-to-push-for-more-ambitious-emissions-targets-on-international-stage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/21/oz-to-push-for-more-ambitious-emissions-targets-on-international-stage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 02:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancun UN climate change conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reducing carbon emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=248243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia is using the anticipated passage of its carbon pricing scheme to make a renewed push for more ambitious targets on the international stage, writes <b>Giles Parkinson</b>, of Climate Spectator.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/09/21/oz-to-push-for-more-ambitious-emissions-targets-on-international-stage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The science isn&#8217;t in on thermodynamics</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/11/video-colbert-global-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/11/video-colbert-global-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 03:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video of the Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Colbert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=240424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Colbert agrees with Rush Limbaugh on the global warming agenda being pushed by SpongeBob SquarePants.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/08/11/video-colbert-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rundle: pen-pinching Klaus a prized Righter, not a freedom fighter</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/29/rundle-pen-pinching-klaus-a-prized-righter-not-a-freedom-fighter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/29/rundle-pen-pinching-klaus-a-prized-righter-not-a-freedom-fighter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 02:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy Rundle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guy Rundle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thilo sarrazin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaclav Klaus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=238490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Poetic really, that the Czechs should present us with two examples of humanity, under the name Vaclav.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/29/rundle-pen-pinching-klaus-a-prized-righter-not-a-freedom-fighter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CSIRO says sea level claims from Oz expert are dead in the water</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/27/csiro-says-sea-level-claims-from-oz-expert-are-dead-in-the-water/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/27/csiro-says-sea-level-claims-from-oz-expert-are-dead-in-the-water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 03:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSIRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Australian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=237897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CSIRO is crying foul over a front page article in The Australian last week which "misinterpreted" a report on rising sea levels and claimed the national research body's model for global warming was "already dead in the water as having no sound basis in probability".]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/27/csiro-says-sea-level-claims-from-oz-expert-are-dead-in-the-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon tax pitch misses the mark: it’s the climate, stupid.</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/18/carbon-tax-pitch-misses-the-mark-it%e2%80%99s-the-climate-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/18/carbon-tax-pitch-misses-the-mark-it%e2%80%99s-the-climate-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 03:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=236012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem is that barely half the population believes climate change is real and human caused; fewer support the tax. And much of that opinion is soft: it’s one of many concerns, writes <b>David Spratt</b>, climate change analyst and author of <i>Climate Code Red</i>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/18/carbon-tax-pitch-misses-the-mark-it%e2%80%99s-the-climate-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time travel</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/18/crikey-says-time-travel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/18/crikey-says-time-travel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 03:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=235981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A report from <em>The Age</em> on government advertising to educate the public about climate change ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/18/crikey-says-time-travel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Most of Australia&#8217; can expect more than 50 degrees by end of century</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/15/most-of-australia-can-expect-more-than-50-degrees-by-end-of-century/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/15/most-of-australia-can-expect-more-than-50-degrees-by-end-of-century/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 03:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consequences of global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=235760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If all the commitments made by governments around the world to reduce greenhouse gas were honoured, and that is all, then temperatures by 2100 would likely be about four degrees warmer than 1900, writes <b>David Spratt</b>, climate change analyst and author of Climate Code Red.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/15/most-of-australia-can-expect-more-than-50-degrees-by-end-of-century/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/15/crikey-says-perspective/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/15/crikey-says-perspective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 03:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Four degrees or more]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=235675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of talk about carbon this week. Not much about global warming, though.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/15/crikey-says-perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The international response to our carbon tax</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/12/crikey-says-the-international-response-to-our-carbon-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/12/crikey-says-the-international-response-to-our-carbon-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 02:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gillard government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=234863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is, ultimately, the most important aspect of the Government's carbon pricing scheme -- showing the rest of the world that Australia takes climate change seriously enough to warrant major economic reform.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/12/crikey-says-the-international-response-to-our-carbon-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crikey says: Climate Change Authority key to carbon future</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/11/crikey-says-climate-change-authority-key-to-carbon-future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/11/crikey-says-climate-change-authority-key-to-carbon-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 03:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct action plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Abbott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=234536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the better aspects of the carbon price package revealed yesterday is its governance arrangements. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/11/crikey-says-climate-change-authority-key-to-carbon-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon tax: the policy and the politics</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/10/carbon-tax-the-policy-and-the-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/10/carbon-tax-the-policy-and-the-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 02:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multi Party Climate Change Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price on pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=234478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a better package than the CPRS it is so closely modelled on, but not by a lot. It's certainly as voter-friendly a policy as pricing carbon was ever going to be.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/10/carbon-tax-the-policy-and-the-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>151</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon tax: Gillard&#8217;s &#8216;Clean Energy Future&#8217; at a glance</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/10/carbon-tax-gillards-clean-energy-future-at-a-glance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/10/carbon-tax-gillards-clean-energy-future-at-a-glance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 02:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Gillard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multi Party Climate Change Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price on pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=234476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government has announced its "Clean Energy Future" package to commence from July 1, 2012. These are the details at a glance.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/10/carbon-tax-gillards-clean-energy-future-at-a-glance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon pricing: the big picture</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/05/carbon-pricing-the-big-picture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/05/carbon-pricing-the-big-picture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 03:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=232791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can have the most well-designed, democratic, efficient, no-loser everyone-gets-a-pony policies in place -- if the climate goes to pot, we’ve lost, writes <b>Martin C. Jones</b>, an environmental economist and researcher.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/05/carbon-pricing-the-big-picture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Dog: scientific proof it was Hug a Climate Scientist Day!</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/17/first-dog-scientific-proof-it-was-hug-a-climate-scientist-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/17/first-dog-scientific-proof-it-was-hug-a-climate-scientist-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 03:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Firstdog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hug a Climate Scientist Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=229952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We asked you the reader to send scientific proof of actual hugging of Climate Scientists/Warmenists/and/or/Pets and the best ones would win Cooty Notes and some of you did. Here they are. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/17/first-dog-scientific-proof-it-was-hug-a-climate-scientist-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Risky business in planning for rising sea levels</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/08/risky-business-in-planning-for-rising-sea-levels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/08/risky-business-in-planning-for-rising-sea-levels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 02:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melting glaciers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melting ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penny Wong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rising sea levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Boswell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=227731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New government reports found a "worst-case scenario sea level rise of 1.1 metres" within 90 years would have a devastating impact, with as much as $266 billion worth of potential damage, writes <b>David Spratt</b>, climate change analyst and author of Climate Code Red.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/08/risky-business-in-planning-for-rising-sea-levels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global warming above 2° so far mitigated by accidental geo-engineering</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/06/global-warming-above-2%c2%b0-so-far-mitigated-by-accidental-geo-engineering/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/06/global-warming-above-2%c2%b0-so-far-mitigated-by-accidental-geo-engineering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 03:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arctic sea ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melting glaciers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=226538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Science climate reports, global warming is already committed to a rise above two degrees, writes <b>Dr Andrew Glikson</b>, Earth and paleoclimate science, Australian National University]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/06/global-warming-above-2%c2%b0-so-far-mitigated-by-accidental-geo-engineering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crikey says: a healthy scepticism</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/02/crikey-says-a-healthy-scepticism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/02/crikey-says-a-healthy-scepticism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 03:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate sceptic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=226745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meanwhile ... from the Hansard of the Legislative Council, NSW Parliament, dated May 30:]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/06/02/crikey-says-a-healthy-scepticism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rundle: the celebrities won&#8217;t save us</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/31/rundle-the-celebrities-wont-save-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/31/rundle-the-celebrities-wont-save-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 03:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy Rundle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guy Rundle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cate Blanchett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=226339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The spectacle of the debate centring around the presence of one celeb in one ad, should be something more than merely wearying in the manner of beat-ups. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/31/rundle-the-celebrities-wont-save-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commission&#8217;s call for carbon budget beyond political belief</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/23/commissions-call-for-carbon-budget-beyond-political-belief/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/23/commissions-call-for-carbon-budget-beyond-political-belief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 03:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming climate change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=224725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Critical Decade report released today by the Climate Commission calls for a "fresh approach" to setting emission reduction targets, in particular by using a global "carbon budget". But what does that mean for Australia?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/05/23/commissions-call-for-carbon-budget-beyond-political-belief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1660/1936 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 02:53:22 -->
