<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; gawker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/gawker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Blogger bribes: new dodgy advertising methods</title>
		<link>http://gawker.com/5853502/the-shady-marketing-scheme-thats-buying-off-your-favorite-bloggers</link>
		<comments>http://gawker.com/5853502/the-shady-marketing-scheme-thats-buying-off-your-favorite-bloggers#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=255408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An US marketing company pays bloggers on major US websites to insert links to company's websites in the middle of an article -- and its clients include Dell and T-Mobile, says <b>Hamilton Noltan</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/5853502/the-shady-marketing-scheme-thats-buying-off-your-favorite-bloggers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to succeed in new media</title>
		<link>http://tjd.posterous.com/a-masterclass-in-new-media</link>
		<comments>http://tjd.posterous.com/a-masterclass-in-new-media#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traditional blogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=189919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Gawker</em> founder Nick Denton is currently in the process of redesigning his websites, ditching the traditional basic blog structure in favour of formats more conducive to images and video. <b>Tim Dunlop</b> presents his mini masterclass in new media tools and tips.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tjd.posterous.com/a-masterclass-in-new-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gawking at his blog empire</title>
		<link>http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/18/101018fa_fact_mcgrath?currentPage=all</link>
		<comments>http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/18/101018fa_fact_mcgrath?currentPage=all#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 01:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[must read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=177767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A <em>New Yorker</em> profile on Nick Denton, founder of Gawker Media: think <a href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/">Gizmodo</a>, <a href="http://gawker.com/">Gawker</a> and <a href="http://jezebel.com/">Jezebel</a>. Is Denton the ruthless evil wizard of the blog world, or just a very clever businessman?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/18/101018fa_fact_mcgrath?currentPage=all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blog bullies: Gawker picks fights with the big boys</title>
		<link>http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=144679</link>
		<comments>http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=144679#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 07:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Apparel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perez Hilton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=149376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blogging can be big business and Gawker Media is now such a powerful media organisation that it's not afraid to publicly slaughter companies like American Apparel and Apple.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=144679/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Jobs&#8217; most hated website</title>
		<link>http://www.theatlanticwire.com/features/view/feature/How-Much-Does-Steve-Jobs-Hate-Gawker-Now-1403</link>
		<comments>http://www.theatlanticwire.com/features/view/feature/How-Much-Does-Steve-Jobs-Hate-Gawker-Now-1403#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=145463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Gawker</em> has been brutal with its Apple coverage of late, from the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5520471/the-tale-of-apples-next-iphone?skyline=true&#038;s=i">leaked iPhone 4</a>, to the <a href="http://gawker.com/5539717/">email spat with Steve Jobs</a> and now the iPad <a href="http://gawker.com/5559346/apples-worst-security-breach-114000-ipad-owners-exposed">exposed emails story</a>. Steve Jobs must be getting hot under his skivvy collar.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theatlanticwire.com/features/view/feature/How-Much-Does-Steve-Jobs-Hate-Gawker-Now-1403/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Jobs vs. Gawker: the porn email war</title>
		<link>http://gawker.com/5539717/</link>
		<comments>http://gawker.com/5539717/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 23:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple vs. Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=138886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Gawker's</em> <b>Ryan Tate</b> picked an email fight with Apple boss CEO over the idea of the iPad as revolutionary, Adobe vs. Apple, the leaked iPhone 4 saga and whether Apple should censor porn. Surprisingly, Jobs wrote back. Again and again. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/5539717/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Gizmodo have paid for the leaked iPhone?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2010/04/gawkers_iphone.php</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2010/04/gawkers_iphone.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 08:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gizmodo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=132147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Gizmodo</em> got a major <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5520164/this-is-apples-next-iphone">scoop</a> with the leaking of the new iPhone. <b>Foster Kamer</b> talks to Gawker Media head honcho Nick Denton about Steve Jobs' angry phone call, the ethics of publishing the scoop and whether they're on Apple's black list now.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2010/04/gawkers_iphone.php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2000s: the decade of Gawker</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-gawker-decade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-gawker-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=106530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gawker Media has defined blogging in the 2000s, says <em>Mediaite</em> (which is pretty generous, as they're basically direct competitors): its stable of snarky sites -- including <a href="http://gizmodo.com/">Gizmodo</a>, <a href="http://www.deadspin.com">Deadspin</a> and flagship <a href="http://www.gawker.com">Gawker</a> -- setting the benchmark to which every other site aspires.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/the-gawker-decade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I quit my job as a national newspaper editor to be a blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlLA/journos/fbla_exclusive_trendsetter_richard_rushfield_wants_us_not_to_follow_him_142273.asp</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlLA/journos/fbla_exclusive_trendsetter_richard_rushfield_wants_us_not_to_follow_him_142273.asp#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[la times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=97742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why would any self-respecting journo leave their job as an editor at one of the US's largest national newspapers, the <em>LA Times</em> to work for media gossip site <em>Gawker</em>? To be part of the nation's "cultural conversation".]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlLA/journos/fbla_exclusive_trendsetter_richard_rushfield_wants_us_not_to_follow_him_142273.asp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How much did Gawker pay for its Balloon Boy exclusive?</title>
		<link>http://www.mediaite.com/online/how-much-did-gawker-pay-for-proof-balloon-boy-was-a-hoax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediaite.com/online/how-much-did-gawker-pay-for-proof-balloon-boy-was-a-hoax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balloon boy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chequebook journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistic standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=93859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Media gossip site and <a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/07/with-ad-revenue-up-35-gawker-media-returns-to-pageview-bonuses-and-plans-checkbook-journalism/">unapologetic fans</a> of chequebook journalism <em>Gawker</em> beat the mainstream media to the weekend's big scoop with its exclusive "<a href="http://gawker.com/5383858/exclusive-i-helped-richard-heene-plan-a-balloon-hoax">I Helped Richard Heene Plan a Balloon Hoax</a>" -- but how much did they pay for the privilege?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediaite.com/online/how-much-did-gawker-pay-for-proof-balloon-boy-was-a-hoax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gawker translate censored story into Russian</title>
		<link>http://gawker.com/5352827/------gq---</link>
		<comments>http://gawker.com/5352827/------gq---#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 16:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KGB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=84431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outraged at <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112530364">revelations</a> that <em>GQ</em> buried a story linking Vladimir Putin to a series of 1999 bombings to keep it out of Russia, <em>Gawker</em> has rallied its readership to translate the article into Russian and spread it online.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/5352827/------gq---/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Gawker prompt a State Department investigation?</title>
		<link>http://gawker.com/5351138/how-gawker-launched-a-state-department-investigation</link>
		<comments>http://gawker.com/5351138/how-gawker-launched-a-state-department-investigation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 05:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war in Afghanistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=84049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US secretary of state Hillary Clinton has <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/sep/02/afghanistan-embassy-guards">ordered an investigation</a> into <a href="http://www.pogo.org/pogo-files/letters/contract-oversight/co-gp-20090901.html">allegations</a> that private security contractors guarding the US embassy in Kabul are having wild, drunken parties involving prostitutes, violence and hazing. Can snarky media gossip site <em>Gawker</em> take credit? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/5351138/how-gawker-launched-a-state-department-investigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gawker bring back chequebook journalism</title>
		<link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/07/with-ad-revenue-up-35-gawker-media-returns-to-pageview-bonuses-and-plans-checkbook-journalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/07/with-ad-revenue-up-35-gawker-media-returns-to-pageview-bonuses-and-plans-checkbook-journalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 04:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chequebook journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=73152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gawker Media -- the stable housing <em>Defamer</em>, <em>Lifehacker</em>, <em>Gizmodo</em> et al -- will once again offer payment to tipsters based on the amount of pageviews generated by posts based on their tips.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/07/with-ad-revenue-up-35-gawker-media-returns-to-pageview-bonuses-and-plans-checkbook-journalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gawker founder: &#8220;We may inadvertently commit journalism&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/21/AR2009062101822.html?hpid=topnews</link>
		<comments>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/21/AR2009062101822.html?hpid=topnews#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=68709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Try as he might, <em><a href="http://www.gawker.com">Gawker</a></em> founder Nick Denton's attempts to run a snarky media gossip site often results in real journalism.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/21/AR2009062101822.html?hpid=topnews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gawker chief rejects old media hacks</title>
		<link>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/i-want-media</link>
		<comments>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/i-want-media#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 02:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=64640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes there's a lot of experienced print journos desperate for work at the moment, but the head of the <em>Gawker</em> blog empire, Nick Denton, says he doesn't want them. "They don't adjust well to working online." Ouch.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.observer.com/2009/media/i-want-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pay-per-view not a blogger&#8217;s friend</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/17/pay-per-view-not-a-bloggers-friend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/17/pay-per-view-not-a-bloggers-friend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Nethercote</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What's more important for a website's longevity? Who's reading? Or how many people are reading? <b>Jane Nethercote</b> poses some questions. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/04/17/pay-per-view-not-a-bloggers-friend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Kevin Rudd&#8217;s strip shame&#8221; girdles the globe</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/21/kevin-rudds-strip-shame-girdles-the-globe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/21/kevin-rudds-strip-shame-girdles-the-globe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ny daily news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[page six]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The world's newspapers are revelling in the fact that finally there's something interesting to report about Australia (that isn't Pauline Hanson).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/21/kevin-rudds-strip-shame-girdles-the-globe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rupert Street Journal looks a done deal</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/06/27/rupert-street-journal-looks-a-done-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/06/27/rupert-street-journal-looks-a-done-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media-Arts-and-Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnnmoney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dow jones newswires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The skinny is that Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation has reached an "in principle" deal with negotiators from Dow Jones that would ensure the editorial independence of <i>The Wall Street Journal</i>. And then there's China, Wendi and the Grim Reaper.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/06/27/rupert-street-journal-looks-a-done-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1280/1473 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-11 17:27:39 -->
