<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; forestry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/forestry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ALP conference: construction industry proposal a hot topic</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/02/alp-conference-construction-industry-proposal-a-hot-topic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/02/alp-conference-construction-industry-proposal-a-hot-topic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 06:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Crook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALP national conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Building and Construction Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Work Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mining and Energy Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=263158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An urgent ALP conference amendment proposed by construction union chief Dave Noonan to amend Labor's national platform to outlaw special inspectors has been withdrawn at the 11th hour.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/12/02/alp-conference-construction-industry-proposal-a-hot-topic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One of the planet’s “most destructive companies” stresses about Aussie image</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2011/10/18/one-of-the-planets-most-destructive-companies-stresses-about-aussie-image/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2011/10/18/one-of-the-planets-most-destructive-companies-stresses-about-aussie-image/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 01:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Pulp and Paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deforestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=253447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent event hosted by the Indonesian Ambassador revealed just how concerned the large Indonesian forestry companies are about recent public debates in Australia focussing on rainforest destruction in Indonesia, writes <b>Reece Turner</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/rooted/2011/10/18/one-of-the-planets-most-destructive-companies-stresses-about-aussie-image/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With Tassie logging deal done, what about our other forests?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/26/with-tassie-logging-deal-done-what-about-our-other-forests/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/26/with-tassie-logging-deal-done-what-about-our-other-forests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 03:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey Intern</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[native forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old growth forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Burke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=237703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Environmentalists are crying out for federal government intervention and regulation on environmental policies nationwide following the government’s payout deal struck with Tasmania’s lumber industry over the weekend.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/26/with-tassie-logging-deal-done-what-about-our-other-forests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wood, entrepreneur and activist, won&#8217;t die wandering in forest</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/14/wood-entrepreneur-and-activist-wont-die-wandering-in-forest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/14/wood-entrepreneur-and-activist-wont-die-wandering-in-forest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 03:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Thomson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graeme wood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the global mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Triabunna forest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=235536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rich list members Jan Cameron and Graeme Wood find themselves in the middle of the biggest story in Tasmania after the pair yesterday announced they had paid $10 million to buy the Triabunna native forest woodchip mill. Wood won't die wondering.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2011/07/14/wood-entrepreneur-and-activist-wont-die-wandering-in-forest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tiwi forestry: 30,000 hectares of &#8220;bankrupt monoculture&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/northern/2009/10/28/australias-shame-part-2-tiwi-forestry-30000-hectares-of-bankrupt-monoculture/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/northern/2009/10/28/australias-shame-part-2-tiwi-forestry-30000-hectares-of-bankrupt-monoculture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Southern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tiwi islands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=95669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The collapse of the forestry operations on the Tiwi islands represents not just a failure of an ambitious agricultural scheme but also a failure of good corporate governance, says <b>Bob Gosford</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/northern/2009/10/28/australias-shame-part-2-tiwi-forestry-30000-hectares-of-bankrupt-monoculture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tasmania&#8217;s burnoff greenhouse effect a mystery</title>
		<link>http://www.themercury.com.au/article/2009/04/24/68781_tasmania-news.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.themercury.com.au/article/2009/04/24/68781_tasmania-news.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burn-off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forestry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=53205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forestry Tasmania has admitted it does not know how much greenhouse gas is produced by its regeneration burns.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.themercury.com.au/article/2009/04/24/68781_tasmania-news.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ETS sleeper: the government&#8217;s deforestation scam</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/19/ets-sleeper-the-governments-deforestation-scam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/19/ets-sleeper-the-governments-deforestation-scam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Rudd Government’s Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) is riddled with rorts, writes <b>Andrew Macintosh</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/03/19/ets-sleeper-the-governments-deforestation-scam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fuel reduction burns not included in Australia&#8217;s C02 accounting</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/28/fuel-reduction-burns-not-included-in-australias-c02-accounting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/28/fuel-reduction-burns-not-included-in-australias-c02-accounting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forestry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With huge fuel reduction burns planned for this fire season, <b>Crikey naturalist Lionel Elmore</b> asks why the carbon they create is being ignored by foresters and others.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/10/28/fuel-reduction-burns-not-included-in-australias-c02-accounting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Greens simply don’t want any forestry in Tasmania</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/05/the-greens-simply-dont-want-any-forestry-in-tasmania/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/05/the-greens-simply-dont-want-any-forestry-in-tasmania/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dioxin emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulp mill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Greens are entitled to their view, but with no more than 20 percent of the vote in Tasmania and 9 percent nationally, they are not entitled to force it on the rest of the community, writes senior consultant at ITS Global Khalil Hegarty.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/05/the-greens-simply-dont-want-any-forestry-in-tasmania/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 823/934 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-11 20:25:41 -->
