<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; energy efficiency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/energy-efficiency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 04:32:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cleaning up the Oz’s cleantech mess</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/04/cleaning-up-the-ozs-cleantech-mess/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/04/cleaning-up-the-ozs-cleantech-mess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Australian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Australian's Matthew Warren failed to compare apples with apples when writing about the clean technology sector yesterday, writes <b>Garth Lamb</b>, journalist at WME Environmental Management News.net.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/09/04/cleaning-up-the-ozs-cleantech-mess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Sydney Declaration environmentally harmful?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/14/is-the-sydney-declaration-environmentally-harmful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/14/is-the-sydney-declaration-environmentally-harmful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crikey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy conservation systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy intensity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[target]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the dust settles on APEC 2007, details are starting to emerge on the deals and agreements struck by the 21 nations in attendance. In particular, the energy intensity targets in the Sydney Declaration on climate change have come under scrutiny, with some experts suggesting they are actually worse than doing nothing, reports Thomas Hunter.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/14/is-the-sydney-declaration-environmentally-harmful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sydney Declaration: weasels with words</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/10/sydney-declaration-weasels-with-words/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/10/sydney-declaration-weasels-with-words/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apec economies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apec nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are two Sydney Declarations: the aspirational one, compiled before the negotiators of the 21 APEC nations uncapped their red pens, and the actual one, the refined and re-refined final document that everyone agreed to sign. Call it an exercise in decoding international diplomacy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/09/10/sydney-declaration-weasels-with-words/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How are you going to make millions from climate change?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/19/how-are-you-going-to-make-millions-from-climate-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/19/how-are-you-going-to-make-millions-from-climate-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative technology association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crikey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public transport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With climate change rewiring everything from global politics to our choice of light globes, there is an emerging market for energy efficient, eco-friendly, green-tinged good and services. Here, Crikey identifies gaps in the marketplace.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/07/19/how-are-you-going-to-make-millions-from-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
