<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; emissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:18:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Yes, Malcolm, we do lead the world in changing the climate</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/31/yes-malcolm-we-do-lead-the-world-in-changing-the-climate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/31/yes-malcolm-we-do-lead-the-world-in-changing-the-climate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel efficiency standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If admitting you have a problem is the first step in overcoming it, we should be offering Federal Environment Malcolm Turnbull generous praise today for admitting Australia leads the world in climate change, writes Thomas Hunter.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/31/yes-malcolm-we-do-lead-the-world-in-changing-the-climate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crikey Cabbie Panel: Should Australia ratify a post-2012 Kyoto?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/30/crikey-cabbie-panel-should-australia-ratify-a-post-2012-kyoto/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/30/crikey-cabbie-panel-should-australia-ratify-a-post-2012-kyoto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kyoto agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Garrett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symbolic gesture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After labor environment spokesman Peter Garrett put himself in a policy pickle yesterday, we asked the Crikey Cabbie Panel if Australia should sign a post-2012 emissions agreement, regardless of what the US and China do?

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/30/crikey-cabbie-panel-should-australia-ratify-a-post-2012-kyoto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why should green groups take the leap of faith for Rudd?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/13/why-should-green-groups-take-the-leap-of-faith-for-rudd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/13/why-should-green-groups-take-the-leap-of-faith-for-rudd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia's peak greens are in a hot spot. Labor's climate policy is 
vague and lacking urgency, short-term emissions and renewable energy targets. And it is committed to new coal mines and increasing coal exports. Anxious for a Labor victory, what does a good green do? writes David Spratt.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/13/why-should-green-groups-take-the-leap-of-faith-for-rudd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
