<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; emissions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Back to the future on a carbon trade-off</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/24/back-to-the-future-on-a-carbon-trade-off/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/24/back-to-the-future-on-a-carbon-trade-off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 03:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=174217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The debate has been returned to its starting point of more than a decade ago -- a trading scheme versus a carbon tax, writes <b>Giles Parkinson</b>. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/09/24/back-to-the-future-on-a-carbon-trade-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do we really need to work 5 days a week?</title>
		<link>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/08/24/guest-post-should-we-change-the-way-we-work/#more-9425</link>
		<comments>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/08/24/guest-post-should-we-change-the-way-we-work/#more-9425#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[four day working week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working hours]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=81400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What effect would a four day working week have on Australians? For starters: reduced emissions, better quality of life and increased efficiency, writes <b>John Davidson</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://larvatusprodeo.net/2009/08/24/guest-post-should-we-change-the-way-we-work/#more-9425/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama ushers in new era of fuel efficiency</title>
		<link>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/19/business/19emissions.html?hp</link>
		<comments>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/19/business/19emissions.html?hp#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 06:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel efficiencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel efficiency standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=59593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama announces tough new nationwide rules for automobile emissions and mileage standards, embracing standards that California has sought to enact for years over the objections of the auto industry and the Bush administration.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/19/business/19emissions.html?hp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes, Malcolm, we do lead the world in changing the climate</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/31/yes-malcolm-we-do-lead-the-world-in-changing-the-climate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/31/yes-malcolm-we-do-lead-the-world-in-changing-the-climate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel efficiency standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If admitting you have a problem is the first step in overcoming it, we should be offering Federal Environment Malcolm Turnbull generous praise today for admitting Australia leads the world in climate change, writes Thomas Hunter.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/31/yes-malcolm-we-do-lead-the-world-in-changing-the-climate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crikey Cabbie Panel: Should Australia ratify a post-2012 Kyoto?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/30/crikey-cabbie-panel-should-australia-ratify-a-post-2012-kyoto/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/30/crikey-cabbie-panel-should-australia-ratify-a-post-2012-kyoto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kyoto agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Garrett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symbolic gesture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After labor environment spokesman Peter Garrett put himself in a policy pickle yesterday, we asked the Crikey Cabbie Panel if Australia should sign a post-2012 emissions agreement, regardless of what the US and China do?

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/30/crikey-cabbie-panel-should-australia-ratify-a-post-2012-kyoto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why should green groups take the leap of faith for Rudd?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/13/why-should-green-groups-take-the-leap-of-faith-for-rudd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/13/why-should-green-groups-take-the-leap-of-faith-for-rudd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia's peak greens are in a hot spot. Labor's climate policy is 
vague and lacking urgency, short-term emissions and renewable energy targets. And it is committed to new coal mines and increasing coal exports. Anxious for a Labor victory, what does a good green do? writes David Spratt.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/08/13/why-should-green-groups-take-the-leap-of-faith-for-rudd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 681/752 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-11 22:07:45 -->
