<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; Emissions Trading Scheme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/emissions-trading-scheme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:03:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Turnbull&#8217;s climate crunch is coming</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/20/liberals-need-a-climate-deal-anything-else-rains-havoc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/20/liberals-need-a-climate-deal-anything-else-rains-havoc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Minchin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/20/liberals-need-a-climate-deal-anything-else-rains-havoc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull's only real option is to reject Rudd's CPRS and hand victory to Minchin and his colleagues.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/20/liberals-need-a-climate-deal-anything-else-rains-havoc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How will the CPRS Carnival end?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/19/how-will-the-cprs-carnival-end/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/19/how-will-the-cprs-carnival-end/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/19/how-will-the-cprs-carnival-end/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the next week or so, the carnival of climate carpetbaggers is about to fold its tents on the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme. How it will all end up is still anyone's guess, writes <b>John Connor</b>. 

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/19/how-will-the-cprs-carnival-end/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Either way, Turnbull&#8217;s on eggshells</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/18/if-the-cprs-doesnt-get-turnbull-his-party-will/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/18/if-the-cprs-doesnt-get-turnbull-his-party-will/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/18/if-the-cprs-doesnt-get-turnbull-his-party-will/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull is caught in a pincer movement between Liberal conservatives and Kevin Rudd -- and both appear determined to destroy him.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/18/if-the-cprs-doesnt-get-turnbull-his-party-will/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A radioactive issue for the Coalition?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/17/a-radioactive-issue-for-the-coalition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/17/a-radioactive-issue-for-the-coalition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Macfarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Minchin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/17/a-radioactive-issue-for-the-coalition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why has Ian Macfarlane completely reversed his opinion on Carbon Capture and Storage -- from such a strong advocate of the when in government to his recent denunciation on <em>Four Corners</em>? asks <b>Michael James</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/17/a-radioactive-issue-for-the-coalition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Take your CPRS and shove it</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/16/keane-im-sick-of-the-cprs-to-hell-with-you-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/16/keane-im-sick-of-the-cprs-to-hell-with-you-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ETS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/16/keane-im-sick-of-the-cprs-to-hell-with-you-all/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Bernard Keane</b> is sick of Penny Wong's tedious droning, Kevin Rudd's sanctimony, Coalition climate denialists, Barnaby Joyce, rentseekers and everything else tied up in the never-ending CPRS debate.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/16/keane-im-sick-of-the-cprs-to-hell-with-you-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>118</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Australian climate movement needs to take a good, hard look at itself</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/16/the-australian-climate-movement-needs-to-take-a-good-hard-look-at-itself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/16/the-australian-climate-movement-needs-to-take-a-good-hard-look-at-itself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Kevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ETS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/16/the-australian-climate-movement-needs-to-take-a-good-hard-look-at-itself/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following Copenhagen, the Australian climate movement needs to take a hard collective look at itself, with the aim of achieving unity around the crucial goal of reducing Australia's greenhouse house gas emissions to zero by 2030.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/16/the-australian-climate-movement-needs-to-take-a-good-hard-look-at-itself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fake Stephen Fielding: PMS and a One World Government</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/11/ets-fielding-and-a-one-world-government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/11/ets-fielding-and-a-one-world-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fake Stephen Fielding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penny Wong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Fielding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/11/ets-fielding-and-a-one-world-government/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<b>Fake Stephen Fielding</b> has been following the climate change and Emissions Trading Scheme debate very closely, and is very excited at the prospect of a One World Government.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/11/ets-fielding-and-a-one-world-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rudd and the rentseekers: climate for sale</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/09/rudd-could-be-a-great-leader-on-climate-change-if-he-actually-tried/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/09/rudd-could-be-a-great-leader-on-climate-change-if-he-actually-tried/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/09/rudd-could-be-a-great-leader-on-climate-change-if-he-actually-tried/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Prime Minister is so angry about the efforts of denialists to derail action on climate change, here's a suggestion: stop giving them taxpayers' money.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/09/rudd-could-be-a-great-leader-on-climate-change-if-he-actually-tried/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real costs of Rudd&#8217;s CPRS are just starting to surface</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/09/the-real-costs-of-rudds-cprs-are-just-starting-to-surface/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/09/the-real-costs-of-rudds-cprs-are-just-starting-to-surface/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen Climate Change Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ETS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/09/the-real-costs-of-rudds-cprs-are-just-starting-to-surface/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government's climate change policy is incoherent and becoming ever more expensive, writes <b>Sinclair Davidson</b>. No amount of name-calling is going to change the fact that this policy is a lemon and needs to be radically reconsidered. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/09/the-real-costs-of-rudds-cprs-are-just-starting-to-surface/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revealed: The high cost of the CPRS</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/03/myefo-figures-reveal-policy-disaster-that-is-cprs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/03/myefo-figures-reveal-policy-disaster-that-is-cprs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget forecasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MYEFO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/03/myefo-figures-reveal-policy-disaster-that-is-cprs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday’s MYEFO figures reveal in clear terms just what a policy disaster the current version of the CPRS is. It also gives the lie to the absurd line from ETS opponents that the CPRS is a giant tax.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/03/myefo-figures-reveal-policy-disaster-that-is-cprs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reform the food industry &#8212; for the sake of the planet</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/03/reform-the-food-industry-for-the-sake-of-the-planet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/03/reform-the-food-industry-for-the-sake-of-the-planet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food & Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Food and Grocery Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch Hooke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/03/reform-the-food-industry-for-the-sake-of-the-planet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The food industry’s solution of more choice increases profits, but does nothing for obesity. The more on offer, the more we buy, the more we waist and the more we waste, writes <b>Dr Rosemary Stanton</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/03/reform-the-food-industry-for-the-sake-of-the-planet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How much cash will the states get under the CPRS? Zero.</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/28/how-much-cash-will-the-states-get-under-the-cprs-zero/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/28/how-much-cash-will-the-states-get-under-the-cprs-zero/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospitals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brumby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public transport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/28/how-much-cash-will-the-states-get-under-the-cprs-zero/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately for those of us who ever rely on the public health, education or transport systems, the CPRS is estimated to cost state budgets more than $2.1 billion in 2013, writes executive director of the Australia Institute, <b>Dr Richard Denniss</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/28/how-much-cash-will-the-states-get-under-the-cprs-zero/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calm down, no rush on CPRS</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/26/crikey-says-115/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/26/crikey-says-115/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen Climate Change Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Combet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/26/crikey-says-115/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently the CPRS isn't <em>that</em> urgent. Otherwise, why would debate keep getting delayed by both the Coalition and the government?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/26/crikey-says-115/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The $20b CPRS amendments with no budget impact</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/21/the-20b-cprs-amendments-with-no-budget-impact/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/21/the-20b-cprs-amendments-with-no-budget-impact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Conservation Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Opposition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/21/the-20b-cprs-amendments-with-no-budget-impact/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Opposition believes its proposed CPRS amendments will have little or no fiscal impact, despite a suggested significant increase in compensation for trade-exposed polluters and the removal of coal emissions from the scheme.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/21/the-20b-cprs-amendments-with-no-budget-impact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rudd might as well flick the dissolution switch</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/20/rudd-may-as-well-flick-the-dissolution-switch-no-reason-not-to/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/20/rudd-may-as-well-flick-the-dissolution-switch-no-reason-not-to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double dissolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/20/rudd-may-as-well-flick-the-dissolution-switch-no-reason-not-to/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government is now in such a strong position, they may figure they’ll get their CPRS through after a double dissolution with minimal risk. Why bother negotiating with an Opposition so patently out of favour with voters?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/20/rudd-may-as-well-flick-the-dissolution-switch-no-reason-not-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate change, CPRS and politics</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/20/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups-105/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/20/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups-105/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Your Say: Daily Mail readers' feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asylum seekers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/20/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups-105/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Climate change and the ETS were the biggest topics for <em>Crikey</em> readers today, with readers lamenting the politicisation of an global environmental issue.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/20/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups-105/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The parallel universe of Canberra</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/19/crikey-says-110/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/19/crikey-says-110/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crikey Says]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/19/crikey-says-110/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull's finally got the green light from the Coalition to negotiate on the ETS. Too bad all the party politics means the key issue gets ignored.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/19/crikey-says-110/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turnbull&#8217;s execution was all in the mind</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/19/turnbulls-execution-was-all-in-the-mind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/19/turnbulls-execution-was-all-in-the-mind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penny Wong]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/19/turnbulls-execution-was-all-in-the-mind/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday's special coalition party room meeting about whether or not Malcolm Turnbull could get the Coalition to agree to make ETS amendments wasn’t so much a damp squib as sopping wet.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/19/turnbulls-execution-was-all-in-the-mind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coalition CPRS plan will cost $20 billion</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/19/coalition-cprs-plan-will-cost-20billion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/19/coalition-cprs-plan-will-cost-20billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Macfarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penny Wong]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/19/coalition-cprs-plan-will-cost-20billion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The sheer cost of the Coalition’s CPRS demands -- $1.6b in the first full year and over $20b between now and 2020 -- will be the biggest problem as Penny Wong and Ian Macfarlane sit down to negotiate this afternoon.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/19/coalition-cprs-plan-will-cost-20billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The CPRS: what the Liberals want</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/19/the-cprs-what-the-liberals-want/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/19/the-cprs-what-the-liberals-want/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudd government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/19/the-cprs-what-the-liberals-want/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Malcolm Turnbull has convinced the Coalition to push amendments on the  Government’s CPRS. But what is it that the Liberals want?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/19/the-cprs-what-the-liberals-want/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Like a parrot on ritalin: Turnbull&#8217;s weird return to Jonestown</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/16/like-a-parrot-on-ritalin-turnbulls-weird-return-to-jonestown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/16/like-a-parrot-on-ritalin-turnbulls-weird-return-to-jonestown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alan jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barnaby Joyce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/16/like-a-parrot-on-ritalin-turnbulls-weird-return-to-jonestown/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When is a tax not a tax? When it’s a rhetorical device for people opposed to emissions trading schemes. Malcolm Turnbull went to battle with Alan Jones over the ETS.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/16/like-a-parrot-on-ritalin-turnbulls-weird-return-to-jonestown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swan&#8217;s Frontier moment shows just what Turnbull is up against</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/14/swans-frontier-moment-shows-just-what-turnbull-is-up-against/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/14/swans-frontier-moment-shows-just-what-turnbull-is-up-against/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Joye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frontier economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Turnbull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Xenophon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penny Wong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne Swan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/14/swans-frontier-moment-shows-just-what-turnbull-is-up-against/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing is left to chance with the Rudd government. No detail is too small that it can’t be deployed in the remorseless bombardment of the Opposition. Like Wayne Swan picking holes in their CPRS proposal.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/14/swans-frontier-moment-shows-just-what-turnbull-is-up-against/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wong boring everyone to tears with details of flawed CPRS</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/14/wong-boring-everyone-to-tears-with-detail-of-flawed-cprs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/14/wong-boring-everyone-to-tears-with-detail-of-flawed-cprs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change sceptics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penny Wong]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/14/wong-boring-everyone-to-tears-with-detail-of-flawed-cprs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Penny Wong is a climate sceptic. She may use the term to describe those who ignore the overwhelming science about the causes of climate change,  yet she ignores those same scientists when it comes to actual policy, writes <b>Dr Richard Denniss</b>.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/14/wong-boring-everyone-to-tears-with-detail-of-flawed-cprs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greens talk common sense on climate bill</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/12/greens-the-most-economically-rational-party-on-emissions-trading/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/12/greens-the-most-economically-rational-party-on-emissions-trading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/12/greens-the-most-economically-rational-party-on-emissions-trading/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning the Greens launched a raft of amendments to improve the Government’s CPRS bill -- and they're the most sensible suggestions any party has made on the issue in some time.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/12/greens-the-most-economically-rational-party-on-emissions-trading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>102</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australia, you have 3 days to get your act together on climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/07/bangkok-climate-talks-australia-you-have-3-days-to-get-your-act-together/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/07/bangkok-climate-talks-australia-you-have-3-days-to-get-your-act-together/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangkok climate talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen Climate Change Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/07/bangkok-climate-talks-australia-you-have-3-days-to-get-your-act-together/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bangkok's climate talks have shown that the issue of climate aid is one of the main hurdles for producing a better global deal on climate change, -- and Australia is lagging behind the pack, writes <b>Will McGoldrick</b>.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/10/07/bangkok-climate-talks-australia-you-have-3-days-to-get-your-act-together/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
