<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crikey &#187; editors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/topic/editors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why editors rarely sue for defamation</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/03/why-editors-rarely-sue-for-defamation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/03/why-editors-rarely-sue-for-defamation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 02:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalistsic standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=190472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editors rarely sue for defamation in the modern era, for many good reasons, writes <b>Mark Pearson</b>,  professor of journalism at Bond University.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/12/03/why-editors-rarely-sue-for-defamation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The difference between men and women freelancers</title>
		<link>http://www.theawl.com/2010/06/how-men-and-women-pitch-stories-a-disturbing-sampling</link>
		<comments>http://www.theawl.com/2010/06/how-men-and-women-pitch-stories-a-disturbing-sampling#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 02:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freelance journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freelancers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=150249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 'women undersell themselves, men oversell themselves' issue continues, with <em>The Awl</em> comparing how different men and women freelancers pitch stories to them. Men are direct, women are apologetic.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theawl.com/2010/06/how-men-and-women-pitch-stories-a-disturbing-sampling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The secret to being an editor</title>
		<link>http://alienonion.blogspot.com/2010/05/google-say-goohguhl-googled-googling-1.html</link>
		<comments>http://alienonion.blogspot.com/2010/05/google-say-goohguhl-googled-googling-1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 06:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subediting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=144007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editors pen a note of appreciation to the editor's saviour: Google. Where else but Google can give the answer to questions like "do Burgher Sri Lankans have blue eyes?" and "is there a hyphen in 'strong, silent type'?".]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://alienonion.blogspot.com/2010/05/google-say-goohguhl-googled-googling-1.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want to write a book? Become an editor</title>
		<link>http://meanjin.com.au/spike-the-meanjin-blog/post/the-two-headed-beast-writers-working-as-editors-working-as/</link>
		<comments>http://meanjin.com.au/spike-the-meanjin-blog/post/the-two-headed-beast-writers-working-as-editors-working-as/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 03:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=132773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Usually being a writer and being an editor was a complete different kettle of fish. But is it actually advantageous for a young author to work in the publishing industry or does that just cause writing and reading fatigue?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://meanjin.com.au/spike-the-meanjin-blog/post/the-two-headed-beast-writers-working-as-editors-working-as/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOL to replace human editors with robots</title>
		<link>http://www.businessinsider.com/aol-reveals-its-master-plan-robot-editors-2009-11</link>
		<comments>http://www.businessinsider.com/aol-reveals-its-master-plan-robot-editors-2009-11#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=102069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AOL -- owner of big-name websites like <a href="http://www.tmz.com">TMZ</a>, <a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com">Politics Daily</a> and <a href="http://www.popeater.com">Popeater</a> -- is creating an algorithm to automatically assign stories and pay rates to freelancers, based on web searchers and stats.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.businessinsider.com/aol-reveals-its-master-plan-robot-editors-2009-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good editors still matter</title>
		<link>http://www.good.is/post/its-the-editor-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.good.is/post/its-the-editor-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=86520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the advent of self-publishing and blogs, we need good editors more (not less) than ever, writes <b>Anne Trubek</b>. We did the growing of the web, she says, now we need to do the pruning. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.good.is/post/its-the-editor-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The year&#8217;s most powerful fashion mag editors</title>
		<link>http://www.forbes.com/2009/09/04/powerful-fashion-editors-lifestyle-style-anna-wintour.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.forbes.com/2009/09/04/powerful-fashion-editors-lifestyle-style-anna-wintour.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna Wintour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fashion industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fashion magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vogue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crikey.com.au/?p=85184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<em>Forbes</em> look at this year's power players in the fashion press for 2009, a year where <em>The September Issue</em>, <em>Project Runway</em> and <em>America's Next Top Model</em> all shook up the movers and shakers.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.forbes.com/2009/09/04/powerful-fashion-editors-lifestyle-style-anna-wintour.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Daily Verdict: Day 25</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/09/the-daily-verdict-day-25/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/09/the-daily-verdict-day-25/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harold hotelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prime minister john howard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slip ups]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday Labor did marginally better at this salesman's game as measured by Crikey's The Daily Verdict., writes Richard Farmer.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/09/the-daily-verdict-day-25/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reality check: Australian polls poles apart</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/17/reality-check-australian-polls-poles-apart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/17/reality-check-australian-polls-poles-apart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crikey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sid marris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editors of newspapers like to kid themselves that they are in touch with their readers - that they know who they are and what they are interested in reading. Some editors and proprietors even have delusions about influencing the readers and there are politicians aplenty who live in fear that it actually happens. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/10/17/reality-check-australian-polls-poles-apart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 822/931 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-11 23:34:34 -->
